![]() |
Voting "Do-Over" How fucking embarrassing !
If I was reading about the call for "do-over voting" I would expect some Third World shit-hole or a country experiencing the democracy experience for the first time.
Not the United States of America. Fucking pitiful. This is embarrassing ..... as was the last Presidential fiasco in Florida. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080306/...imary_scramble . |
we need a lot of states with a "do-over" there has been so much fraud its mind boggling. This election has been a huge sham. We as Americans can do better than this
|
Florida always seems like it finds a way to fuck things up. I think a do-over is the only fair way to do things there though.
|
Oh well, you can't win them all.
|
Quote:
|
Do-over means mass incompetence, who says it's right the second time if the first was so fucked up?
|
Quote:
|
Meanwhile, the taxpayers of FL will foot the bill. :disgust
|
Bloomberg thinks there was fraud too..
http://www.nypost.com/seven/02192008...aud__98367.htm Countless others, like election officials leaving people off the ballot, telling voters a candidate had dropped out as well. Voting machines in New Hampshire getting the count wrong by 15 to 25%. Washington state throwing out 20 to 25% of the mail in votes. Little things like that. Just google it you will find it on major news outlets. Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
What should have happened is that they shouldn't have been allowed to move the date period then none of this would have happened. |
Its obvious that the powers that be will not let Obama have a chance. They change the rules so they get who they want in power. I live in Florida and dont think they should break the rules just because Hillary is losing.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Obama is the part of the powers to be. This drama is staged to keep the media talking about Obama and Clinton so when they team up the have momentum on their sides.
Quote:
|
Quote:
though shit for FL and MI. next time they should tell the party to leave them alone, and not break the rules. |
Quote:
florida is bigger and more diverse than NH or Iowa so fuck them. Who are they to dictate florida can't move their primary up? Show me in the constitution where it says Iowa and NH come first. Look at how many candidates drop out after those 2 contest even though they are less than 0.2% of the total vote. Quote:
Michigan is different since not all the candidates were on the ballot though that is their own fault for removing themsleves. I support a do over in Michigan though. Once again this helps Obama since Hillary is not likely to get the 65% vote she got last time. Quote:
Only helps Hillary if she wins both states in the fact she can say she won the 8 largest states( if she wins Penn ) except Illinois which is Obama's home state. Doesn't help either get a majority of delegates with just pledged delgates unless Obama wins both states 80-20 or something like that. |
Quote:
it was the Florida REPUBLCIAN legislator that voted to move the primary up and the REPUBLICAN governor that signed the bill. |
Well, Hillary did a fundraiser in Florida that was pre-scheduled and pre-approved, she did not campaign there. This was poured over when it happened, and even though people tried to spin it as "campaigning", it was not denounced as such in any real sense other than anti-clinton spin.
Neither here nor there though, as this whole issue should have pissed off Florida and Michigan democrats when the DNC first declared them invisible in the first place! Problem is, nobody expected there to be a close race. I'm so tired of the press annointing nominees it's not even funny. Obama should quit, Clinton should quit, Ron Paul should quit, Huckabee should quit, Romney should quit. Fuck them! It's a RACE to win votes, leave it the hell alone! Now yesterday, several networks ran banners saying "Superdelegates vs popular vote?" and shit like that. Well let me say this, the superdelegate process is part of the process! So stop whining about it and trying to make it a story now. Some people say that superdelegates should vote the same way that the popular vote went down in their state/county/district. What? Then why were superdelegates invented? For only those rare cases of an exact tie? No. They were invented to exercise *their own* judgment. I even saw some commentor last night on CNN saying that if the superdelegates in a area that Obama won the peoples vote, voted against Obama, that african americans would revolt! What the fuck? That superdelegate was INVENTED and picked for the very fact that their judgment was considered good enough to do the job. Frankly, it has zero to do with who is popular, who the people voted for, what race or gender they are, or if they're fat or dwarf. How dare these assholes try to tell people how to vote, who to vote for, who should quit, what is an "attack", what is "negative".. For christs sake, some morons think that Clintons stupid 3am phone ad is a NEGATIVE attack ad! How so? It's an ad where Clinton tries to say that she is the best to be answering that phone. OOoooooooooooo what a horrible negative attack ad.. how nasty is she, what a bitch. God these pundits make me crazy. The democratic nomination process is what it is. If Michigan and Florida governments want to go ahead and hold new primaries and/or caucuses, GOOD FOR THEM because the issue is the millions of regular, real people who's votes have been cast aside because their states GOVERNMENTS fucked up! So this is maybe the one time in our lives when a government fucks up, a government does a do-over, and the people get the benefit! Unreal that there would be opposition to it. Ahh that felt pretty good :winkwink: |
Once I read a quote from when russia was the soviet union. The man said the only difference between the soviet union and USA is we know we arent free.
With all the voting shit makes you think. |
Quote:
|
The Democratic Superdelegates deciding a nominee has never been tested. From my understanding it was put into place in 1982 as a result of the 1980's convention - the 3rd time the convention was split. It will be very interesting to see how it plays out and if it is still around during the next presidential election.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I think when all this originally happened there wasn't a huge fuss made because, at that time, Hillary was stomping everyone in the polls and most democrats figured she would win easily so there wouldn't be much drama. Of course the exact opposite has happened. |
they should just split the delegates down the middle and seat them. It solves the problem and no one gets the advantage.
I'd love to see Hillary dance around why that wouldn't work. You know because she just cares about the voters soooooo much. |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:09 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123