GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Who wants pre 1995 content, 2257 exempt, semi exclusive? (pics) (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=812780)

Paul Markham 03-05-2008 06:42 AM

Who wants pre 1995 content, 2257 exempt, semi exclusive? (pics)
 
Got a lot of it and here are a few samples from flat bed scans, we will scan the negs in the future.


http://www.paulmarkham.com/temp/davina.jpg

http://www.paulmarkham.com/temp/diana_wynn.jpg

http://www.paulmarkham.com/temp/georgette_neale.jpg

http://www.paulmarkham.com/temp/louise_hodges.jpg

http://www.paulmarkham.com/temp/lucy_gresty.jpg

http://www.paulmarkham.com/temp/vida_garmen.jpg

http://www.paulmarkham.com/temp/alex.jpg

The quality of the negatives scans is much better.

There are UK porn stars, hairy pussy, amateurs, teens, stocking, big tits and more in the files.

Iron Fist 03-05-2008 06:49 AM

They shaved back then too? Although it wasn't a popular option! Wow... has photography come a long way since then :)

Paul Markham 03-05-2008 07:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sharphead (Post 13872934)
They shaved back then too? Although it wasn't a popular option! Wow... has photography come a long way since then :)

When a girl turned up shaven in the early 90s we knew she was working in the business somewhere, model, stripper or hooker. The mobile confirmed the last one. :1orglaugh

There was a magazine called Shaven Ravers, $1000 a set and it took 30 minutes to shoot. They would take nearly anything under 25 that was shaving, lots of foam and razor shots. Easy money. And if you did the shaving good she might let you lick it dry.

This one went around the world and made a lot of money.

http://www.paulmarkham.com/details.php?id=705

Before I took the razor to the pussy.

http://www.bargainbasementcontent.co...ils.php?id=675

The only thing to change is technology and a bit on styles. Still the same old business.

Paul Markham 03-05-2008 07:09 AM

This was the norm.

http://www.paulmarkham.com/temp/caroline.jpg

Tasted different, so I suppose the taste has changed. LOL

Ron2k1 03-05-2008 07:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 13872981)
This was the norm.

http://www.paulmarkham.com/temp/caroline.jpg

Tasted different, so I suppose the taste has changed. LOL

Good lord, that's some nasty bush

Iron Fist 03-05-2008 07:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ron2k1 (Post 13872989)
Good lord, that's some nasty bush

No kidding.... :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :helpme

crockett 03-05-2008 07:28 AM

Isn't that like a Oxymoron? How could you prove it's pre 1995 unless you had the ID's and model contracts?

tranza 03-05-2008 07:57 AM

The quality looks terrible.

Just Alex 03-05-2008 08:06 AM

Ill trade it for my Pokemon cards.

pornguy 03-05-2008 08:11 AM

Pual. I know someone that might be able to use if.

ICQ or mail???

Paul Markham 03-05-2008 08:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 13873081)
Isn't that like a Oxymoron? How could you prove it's pre 1995 unless you had the ID's and model contracts?

Who says I don't have the IDs and model releases?

I just said it was exempt, did not say I don't have the ID's and MR's

Give me 2 minutes.

Paul Markham 03-05-2008 08:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 13873081)
Isn't that like a Oxymoron? How could you prove it's pre 1995 unless you had the ID's and model contracts?

http://www.paulmarkham.com/temp/1991_mr.jpg

I will accept your apology written on a $100 bill. :1orglaugh

Some of us knew what we were doing back then. LOL

crockett 03-05-2008 08:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 13873220)
Who says I don't have the IDs and model releases?

I just said it was exempt, did not say I don't have the ID's and MR's

Give me 2 minutes.

Ahh I got yea.. I thought you were meaning as in no id ect ect.. by the no 2257

Paul Markham 03-05-2008 08:30 AM

This is a sample of a negative scan. It's been downsized for here.

http://www.paulmarkham.com/temp/asian-009.jpg

A lot better than a flat bed.

Paul Markham 03-05-2008 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 13873286)
Ahh I got yea.. I thought you were meaning as in no id ect ect.. by the no 2257

I got yea.

I had magazine editors, accountants and tax men looking over my shoulder. The police were also a small problem. :1orglaugh

Paul Markham 03-05-2008 08:39 AM

I have around 150 pages of negative strips, they will or should all scan up nice. 150 x30 =4.500. Approx.

Looking to do a deal with a one time semi exclusive deal for the lot. With just us and the buyer using them.

$1 an image sounds a nice starting price. Can sell the sets at $4 a set all day long, but looking to hit a one off deal.

PantieZ 03-05-2008 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 13873323)
I have around 150 pages of negative strips, they will or should all scan up nice. 150 x30 =4.500. Approx.

Looking to do a deal with a one time semi exclusive deal for the lot. With just us and the buyer using them.

$1 an image sounds a nice starting price. Can sell the sets at $4 a set all day long, but looking to hit a one off deal.


$1 per pic for 12 years old images ??

this is wwwaaaayyyy to much imo :2 cents:

Violetta 03-05-2008 11:03 AM

damn sexy... I like vintage! :)

teg0 03-05-2008 12:30 PM

hmm..bookmarking. Might be interested in a few weeks.

Paul Markham 03-05-2008 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PantieZ (Post 13873644)
$1 per pic for 12 years old images ??

this is wwwaaaayyyy to much imo :2 cents:

The situation is we could sell it in the stores under the normal license at 10 cents an image and probably sell it a lot more than 10 times. In fact lots of people would love to have 2257 exempt porn pictures.

The industry is always saying exclusive is the best, niche is the key and 2257 is a pain. So who is willing to pay for it?

baddog 03-05-2008 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 13873081)
Isn't that like a Oxymoron? How could you prove it's pre 1995 unless you had the ID's and model contracts?

That is the problem. Proving it is pre-2257.

TheDoc 03-05-2008 03:41 PM

You publish something the second you put it online. It is no longer pre 1995. That rule means, anything that was "already published" before 1995.. Once you touch it, it's not a new production.

KILL_FRENZY 03-05-2008 04:01 PM

lovely vintage

Paul Markham 03-06-2008 01:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 13876079)
That is the problem. Proving it is pre-2257.

Not a problem for me.

JFK 03-06-2008 01:41 AM

some nice shots there Paul:thumbsup

viencarl 03-06-2008 05:01 AM

Hell yeah i saw bushy pussy hear :):):)

Tat2Jr 03-06-2008 05:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 13876154)
You publish something the second you put it online. It is no longer pre 1995. That rule means, anything that was "already published" before 1995.. Once you touch it, it's not a new production.

Good point.

Roald 03-06-2008 05:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 13873302)
This is a sample of a negative scan. It's been downsized for here.

http://www.paulmarkham.com/temp/asian-009.jpg

A lot better than a flat bed.

Can you show a face pic of these 2 girls Paul?

Phil 03-06-2008 07:01 AM

I bet some of those girls look like crap now. ewwwww...

Paul Markham 03-06-2008 07:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by QuaShe (Post 13880390)
Can you show a face pic of these 2 girls Paul?

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=812749

Paul Markham 03-06-2008 07:40 AM

Egyptian girl or Indian?

What do you think?

nastymed 03-06-2008 12:36 PM

it's amazing how porn content gets old pretty fast...
it's almost vintage
not sure this would sell but who knows

Barefootsies 03-06-2008 12:42 PM

I see lots of clam. How about the tootsies?

You have REAL foot fetish content, AND, what are you looking for in prices hoss?

Paul Markham 03-06-2008 11:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nastymed (Post 13885291)
it's amazing how porn content gets old pretty fast...
it's almost vintage
not sure this would sell but who knows

I think it will be a limited market, but one that is under supplied. Many markets sell extremely well, the problem is saturation of the niche. Some of this content can not be shot today. Well you can find a few girls with unshaven pussies, but how many?

This content Ithink will appeal to guys of my age looking to rekindle the memories of times past.

Indian, Asian and the Arab girl, all markets where the niche is under supplied.

Paul Markham 03-07-2008 03:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies (Post 13885345)
I see lots of clam. How about the tootsies?

You have REAL foot fetish content, AND, what are you looking for in prices hoss?

We have some. This content is unique and we are very unlikely to sell it on the stores. So if anyone wants it semi exclusive they need to make an offer. A serious offer.

BergyK 03-07-2008 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CAMOKAT (Post 13881166)
I bet some of those girls look like crap now. ewwwww...

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:02 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123