GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Is there any way to enlarge an image without loosing quality ?? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=81081)

Goonx 10-07-2002 07:22 PM

Is there any way to enlarge an image without loosing quality ??
 
I dont care how big (KB) it gets, its not for web use...

its a jpeg, and right now it is in exclent quality, but I need to enlarge it just a bit without loosing any quality what so ever, is that possible ??

or do we not have that technology yet? :Graucho

foe 10-07-2002 07:22 PM

no

Goonx 10-07-2002 07:25 PM

foe, I contact you for a php job ... you never replied...

too late now anyways... :glugglug

Amputate Your Head 10-07-2002 07:27 PM

no.... it's not really a question of technology.... the technology is there. But you can't squeeze blood from a rock.

GFED 10-07-2002 07:28 PM

I think if it's in vector format instead of pixels you can... if I remember correctly, Corel can convert it to vectors and allow you to enlarge graphics without any loss of quality...

gothweb 10-07-2002 07:28 PM

Amp is right. The thing is, you can't *add* data that has been lost. Some algorithms aren't bad, and there are tricks you can pull, but it will never be as nice as you started, unless you started with crap (or a geometric image, maybe).

TheFLY 10-07-2002 07:30 PM

no.

don't do it.

mrthumbs 10-07-2002 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by GFED
I think if it's in vector format instead of pixels you can... if I remember correctly, Corel can convert it to vectors and allow you to enlarge graphics without any loss of quality...
Excellent!

Corel users: please enlarge this pic for me to 1024*800
so i can use it as a background!

http://www.thumbsz.com/shit/small.gif

Thanks!!!!

gothweb 10-07-2002 07:33 PM

For once, MrThumbs is actually funny. ;)

XXXPaysiteDesign 10-07-2002 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by mrthumbs


Excellent!

Corel users: please enlarge this pic for me to 1024*800
so i can use it as a background!

http://www.thumbsz.com/shit/small.gif

Thanks!!!!


:1orglaugh

Goonx 10-07-2002 07:48 PM

nice, my thread converts 1:6 :thumbsup

faytl 10-07-2002 07:59 PM

you don't want to lose any quality whatsoever, but it's a jpeg ? :)

about the best you could try is to use something decent like photoshop to resize, and keep the aspect ratio the best you can... :thumbsup

vik 10-07-2002 08:08 PM

Go get a haircut, and after the barber cuts too much off, tell him to put it back. Same thing with a pic, no matter jpeg or tif, you can't add back something that wasn't there. You only start with so many pixels, that's all you get to work with.

You can however, with Photoshop, enlarge it, then spend HOURS blending, smoothing, cloning, and blurring to get something that "looks" like the original. Best advice, convert it first to a tif, do your work, then convert back to a jpeg for the web.

:stoned

vik

Choder 10-07-2002 08:48 PM

I've always wondered what would happen if you took a photo of a photo, I'll bet you could make it huge again?

UnseenWorld 10-08-2002 12:17 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Choder
I've always wondered what would happen if you took a photo of a photo, I'll bet you could make it huge again?
An analog enlargement of an alalog pic. Yes, of course you can do that, but you'd just be enlarging grain in the photo. And no analog rendition of an analog subject (whether enlarging or reducing) can add detail. In fact, it always costs you detail and is always worse (in the sense of being less accurate) than the original.

As for a digital photo, suppose I shoot a photo of a car, and the license plate is rendered by 500 pixels, allowing me to see the numbers on the plate. Now I drastically reduce the photo so that only 20 pixels are used. I think you can see that you can't render the 6 or 8 numbers in a plate with only 20 pixels (block out 20 squares on a piece of paper and try it). What has been lost is called "information." I think you can also see that if you blow that 20 pixel area back up to 500 pixels again, there will be no numbers there. It will just be a larger illegible blotch. The information is gone.

EscortBiz 10-08-2002 12:21 AM

very interesting now im curious if it can be done

bawdy 10-08-2002 01:01 AM

lol havent heard this term in years but there are fractal compression schemes that will do what u want... obviously the quality is not as good, but it is better than nearest neighbour or straight interpolation techniques used in enlarging images

Theo 10-08-2002 03:26 AM

it happens in movies though :Graucho

pipp 10-08-2002 03:50 AM

You can make it larger. But the pixel resolution stays the same. The larger your picture the more you can largen it some without loosing to much quality.

Toonlogos 10-08-2002 04:28 AM

Genuine Fractals does a pretty good job of enlarging images -

http://www.altamira-group.com/solutions/photo/

Oldy 10-08-2002 04:51 AM

Quote:

Genuine Fractals does a pretty good job of enlarging images -

http://www.altamira-group.com/solutions/photo/
They have plugins for photoshop. I wonder how to enlarge the image without distorting it.

HQ 10-08-2002 06:06 AM

You guys are lying. They did it in Enemy of the State all the time. :)

Toonlogos 10-08-2002 06:06 AM

Well this one works just fine for most images as a photoshop plugin. No noticeable distortion and image enlarges just fine without losing quality. Perfect for taking digital camera pictures and turning them into a resolution fit for printing.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123