![]() |
Low on Cash? AT&T might owe you $100 per day for the last five years
Quote:
|
problem: they lack legal 'standing' to sue over it because they can't prove that they were suspected terrorists, but neither can they find out who was actually suspected, because this is a matter of national security.
|
Unless, of course, an amendment to FISA gets through.
If that's not something you agree with, be sure to write/call your Representatives. It seems the House has finally grown some balls and is standing up to the Executive... for if it wasn't for them, this would already be a non-issue... the Senate had passed an amendment. I think this is a cause worth chiming in on. Nany Pelosi and my Rep have both already heard from me (right after the Republican protest walk-out last week). It just takes a couple simple phonecalls - not even a minute each, and lets the powers-that-be know that we won't stand for the telcom companies getting a free pass after violating citizen liberties. |
Quote:
|
you must have standing to bring a lawsuit
if you cant prove your were wiretapped, how can you sue ?? FBI, NSA and whoever else will not release such info.. dont hold your breath for it. |
So who do I call?
|
AlienQ invented wiretapping.
|
And how do you know if you were wiretapped? I doubt its posted online somewhere :)
WG |
I guess there must be records they will have to show all numbers tapped
|
Quote:
|
This is why a bunch of politicians are primarily concerned with the provision in the wiretapping bill extension (that was NOT passed) that exempts private companies from lawsuits.
Remember a week ago before Bush went to Africa and was saying how much danger we'd be in because democrats refused to deal with the bill? And instead wanted to debate about the fired federal prosecutors? And the republicans all walked out? It was all over this issue. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:46 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123