My 7 year case study. Findings inside. (GRAPH)
 

that's a classic :thumbsup

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh!

the graph approximately intersects at (3.7,3) so once a woman can get 3.7 dicks in her and 3 fingers in her, her unreliability goes through the roof.

The chart has a 3% margin of error.

http://www.abc.net.au/science/featur...img/julius.jpg

Check your geometry, nothing intersects at (3.7,3).

If the graph wasn't the wrong way around (reliability should increase numerically, not decrease right?) it could be stated that girls are least reliable when approaching the clusterfuck asymptote.

is that a graph out of my intro to microeconomics book?

That's why I webmaster and not work for NASA. All I know is that the more shit a girl can shove up her gash, the less reliable she is!
You do the math (and the charts):1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Lol Hahahahaaaa

fuck in my 12 years in the biz thats probably one of the more reliable stats i have seen .. and I have to agree 100% with these findings ..

Hey... check my study...

http://www.nnteenmodels.net/gfy/porn-ratio.jpg

It isn't geometry...it's a graph of a polynomial function, which is based in Algebra.

no I think it's right.... redshoes showed me the calculations he's used. see the pic below.
http://www.bmbhome.com/code.jpg

http://www.sliders.tcz.pl/gfx/genealogia/profesor.jpg

Cartesian coordinates (geometry) - what you referenced
Cartesian plane (geometry) - inherent in using Cartesian coordinates
Curve (geometry) the squiggle on the graph
Point (geometry) the red dot

I kept it simple and silly for the sake of GFY.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

:1orglaugh


(everyone else was doing it :))

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

HAHAHA, thats fucking great too. :thumbsup

Redshoe For President!!!

Now I have a few questions
1) Does that number count pussy and asses?
2) How does toys affect the graft?

NosMo

Neither the x nor y axis has to increase in any particular direction in statistics (contrary to traditional geometry)...it's really up to the person making the graph to dictate what the scale is.

lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

hahahaah

:1orglaugh

That's seriously funnY!

I smiled.

OK... I laughed... a little.

The more shit* a girl shoves up her snatch** the more unreliable she is.



* ANYTHING
** ANY HOLE

That's a good one :thumbsup

http://www.nnteenmodels.net/gfy/porn-ratio.jpg

I agreed to this one specially to the "number of people you allow to use your computer" it's really really true :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh