GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   CC Bill & 13 Year Old "Little Stars" (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=80322)

Fletch XXX 10-03-2002 12:59 PM

CC Bill & 13 Year Old "Little Stars"
 
Someone posted a link to a site being processed by CC Bill on another board - I of course will NOT post the link here, but amidst all the shit flinging It burns my fucking soul to find something like this, today.

Most know I do quite well in the *teen* niche, (18 + LEGAL TEENS) and its fucking sites like this, that cause problems for our genre, and quite possibly this industry as a whole.

13 year old child model sites, still?

Sure this doesnt fall under fantasy.

"We are little stars"

"Tiny Gina"

Unbelievable.

ControlThy 10-03-2002 01:07 PM

Ron C is around, ask him directly.

Curious what his response will be. Anyone processing for these types of questionable sites should have their processing license cancelled. Children and sex are not to be associated with eachother, ever.

Fletch XXX 10-03-2002 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ControlThy
Ron C is around, ask him directly.

Curious what his response will be. Anyone processing for these types of questionable sites should have their processing license cancelled. Children and sex are not to be associated with eachother, ever.

Its some guy on a msg board complaining about paypal shutting down his acct in a thread.

Through investigation some of the board regulars dig up the guys site, and say "well its obvious why they shut you down."

then flame.

Nonetheless his sites are processed by CCbill, and are quite disgusting and blatant.

playa 10-03-2002 01:14 PM

This has been an issue for a very long time with ccbill

sweetcuties 10-03-2002 01:14 PM

Interesting, I found the site... Aren't the owners worried about prosecution?? Fuck that... I had a girl that was 17 and I was considering a nnsite, I'm happy I didn't :2 cents:

cherrylula 10-03-2002 01:16 PM

I guess little gina will have to pay the $750 too eh?

hahaha

Fletch XXX 10-03-2002 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by playa
This has been an issue for a very long time with ccbill
I know.

I thought this shit is illegal now.

I brought it up a long time ago before the non nude busts, and the *fantasy law*

People shot it down then, now its illegal without a doubt.

And I just didnt expect to see it, not this fucking blatant anyhow.

pimpdog3 10-03-2002 01:19 PM

ccbill is very selective in the quality sites they process for.

ControlThy 10-03-2002 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by playa
This has been an issue for a very long time with ccbill
I am wondering why CCBILL would associate itself with sites like these besides the obvious reason. I beleive PSWBilling has the same type of problem, there was an article about this issue - cannot seem to find it at the moment though.

Theo 10-03-2002 01:20 PM

promoting or running such sites, except it is sick, is like playing with fire. The first who needs to be executed,are the parents that try to cash their kids through this process.

Fletch XXX 10-03-2002 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ControlThy


I am wondering why CCBILL would associate itself with sites like these besides the obvious reason. I beleive PSWBilling has the same type of problem, there was an article about this issue - cannot seem to find it at the moment though.

http://news.corporate.findlaw.com/pr...002105643.html

Sunshine McGillicutty 10-03-2002 01:32 PM

holy shit! i've not delved into this site of the adult internet before and I'm not glad I went poking around.

You think "tiny gina" is bad, try "all cute kids." those children are 5-6 fucking years old! And the processor is... drumroll please.. CCBill.

Even though i don't think the gina site is good, i can see normal heterosexual guy finding a pubescent teenage girl cute. but a fucking 5 year old!? what the HELL are you people thinking?

Sunshine McGillicutty 10-03-2002 01:33 PM

holy shit! i've not delved into this site of the adult internet before and I'm not glad I went poking around.

You think "tiny gina" is bad, try "all cute kids." those children are 5-6 fucking years old! And the processor is... drumroll please.. CCBill.

Even though i don't think the gina site is ethical, i can see a normal heterosexual guy finding a pubescent teenage girl with a matureish body cute. But a fucking 5 year old!? what the HELL are you people thinking?

pimpdog3 10-03-2002 01:58 PM

WOOOHOOO!!!!!!

GO CCBILL!!


CCBILL 4 LIFE!

DrGuile 10-03-2002 02:01 PM

Dont expect any reply from CCBill.

They have to very distinct side. The one that yells high and loud that they are a very respectable company.

...and another side that collects the dirty money...


That other side never shows up on msgboards.

pimpdog3 10-03-2002 02:01 PM

personally i think it is very funny how the scumbags from ccbill have avoided this thread, when its right smack in the middle of all this visa BS.

kimmykim? where art thou?

RON(fag)C? where art thou?

corvette? where art thou?

you greedy fucks are to busy trying to secure your business deals with webmasters blatanly lying to them with your smoke screens, and you have the nerve to avoid this issue with kiddie porn/fantasy/crap

haha

ccbill is a great place.

Fletch XXX 10-03-2002 02:14 PM

I dont want this to come off as a CCBill attack during this Visa shit.

I started a thread on this a long time ago as mentioned above, but before the *fantasy ruling and *non nude busts*

I totally thought this whole non nude preteen shit was done with.

But when I find it, I do bring it to the table.

I have nothing against pushing the boundaries in any field, but when it comes to the age of our *models* how can one make exceptions.

I am not looking for anyone to respond or address this matter publicly, just know that we know. And thats half the battle.

Pimpdog, c'mon man Kimmy has nothing to do with.

pimpdog3 10-03-2002 02:21 PM

you are right, kimmy is no longer officially affiliated with them, but she is ALWAYS the first person to stick up for them, but where is she now? not here.

It is well known what ccbill to my account for no reason at all, and I will take every chance i get to speak my mind about ccbill and their ethics in business. They are fucking theives.

[H] 10-03-2002 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by pimpdog3
you are right, kimmy is no longer officially affiliated with them, but she is ALWAYS the first person to stick up for them, but where is she now? not here.
pimpdog is right, she's always the first one waving the CCBill banner in their defense, calling everyone an idiot.

greentea 10-03-2002 03:31 PM

Kimmy will spout her mouth for any company that pays her, a true classless whore.


CCBILL makes enough $$$ off billing for these sites, simple fletch there greedy fucks who will do anything for $$$.


You think they would care about there image, they dont its $$$ first. What happened to the big " were working with the fbi on these sites " ron?


CCBILL is the choice biller for almost all of these sites, i wonder why that is? There a haven for CP , always have been and prob always will be. Dam shame..


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123