Why aren't tube sites banned from the SE's?
 

There should have been major complaints to the SE's about them already so how come i see alot of them still indexed in SE's?

I think torrents would go first if that was to happen, but it wont.

it's pretty fucked up how se's like Google ban sites so easily for selling links but when it comes to copyright infringement (which is even worse) they don't give a shit

why should the search engines remove the rankings they are not violating the copyright of anyone by pointing you to the content.

In the case of torrents they are not even pointing you to the content they are pointing you to someone who is also pointing to the content.

why do you bitch so much . build a hybrid ?

tube sites point you to the content? LOL

no search engines do, they don't actually host the content

there is no direct copyright infringement there.

In the case of torrents it is even more removed because the .torrent files don't have any copyrighted material in them either

they just point to the location of the content.

You're asking why the company that owns YouTube isn't banning sites that infringe on copyright?

Well the biggest SE owns the biggest tube site :upsidedow

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

There ya go :winkwink::thumbsup

:thumbsup

Plus, if one search engine bans them it will get out of business fast like fuck. They are here to make money, not to protect others' interests.

hope it helps :winkwink:

The SE's job is not to play copyright police, it is to index and rank sites.