beautiful-indian-girls.com stolen design
 

:mad:

beautiful-indian-girls.com - stolen site design.

original is here:

http:/www.teenport.com/

Looks like its maybe done by the same designer

Yep, looks like the same designer, it's completely different, but looks similar due to the font and style.

Someone stealing would certainly not invest the time to completely redo a header.

similar indeed.

Its completely different code, thats all i'd care about.

So how was it stolen, if you don't mind me asking? Did he take your graphics, your code, what? 'Cause to me it looks like a DIFFERENT design, where the designer was asked to emulate another design as closely as possible.

its different designers.

but BIG-owner asked second designer about similar style. very similar

So that is theft how, exactly?

i dont interesting in your opinion, i've already read it in one place and dont want to discuss it with your EGO here ;)
leave me alone please ;)

Actually, I'd say it's your ego that's playing tricks on you. You're accusing somebody of THEFT, which you cannot prove because what you THINK is a stolen design is in fact only a copy. Are there similarities between the two designs? Sure. Is the one you're claiming to be stolen an EXACT copy of your design? Nope. Accusing people of wrongdoing without proof is a bannable offense on this board. You have provided zero proof. Just an opinion.

fuck off ;) and go to your own board where is you playing in god ;)

give me chance to read other opinions without your presence ;)

You're WRONGFULLY accusing someone of theft. If someone did this to you you'd be pissing your pants with anger. Just like you're doing now, only for the wrong reasons.

i hope this is your last words ?: )) may i listen other people now ? :)))

Don't want to read what I post, put me on ignore. If you're too fucking arrogant to think I'm posting this for you, you're wrong. I'm posting for OTHERS, so they don't fall for your wrongful accusations.

hahaha, we already read your opinion, and not once ;)

i'm think this person (BIG) is your good friend or something like that becourse you everywhere with your opinion ;)))

They obviously liked your design and tried to emulate it.

But one is a blog and one is a TGP. There are no actual stolen graphics or code. Everything was completely redone.

I don't think there is much you can do about that.

You're definitely treating this like a grown-up. :)

don't suppose this 'beautiful-indian-girls' website has anything to do w/ that fuckstick Mohit Behl perhaps? if so a stolen site design would be the least of the crimes probably involved..

Not stolen, just emulated

How about take a style, the way how design look in whole? Emulated or whatever else ... It LOOKS similar! That does matter!!!

First designer spent a week to figure out unique good-looking view of site, and second ass-head owner/designer just copy/emulate that pretty look. Why someone trying to make something different than other does, and other ones keep copy/emulating the good ideas and etc in design?

Is it normal today?:mad: I suppose it's not. So I prefer to call it's theft ... theft of ideas, styles, the way of look, color sheme and etc.

I agree.

Actually, from what I understand the client wanted the same look. Sure, there are bonehead designers out there who do nothing but copy others' work, but they don't last very long. Lets be realistic, any level-headed designer will not come up with such a blatant copy for a client and run the risk of having his ass dragged out on boards for it.

Just take a look at the plethora of paysites out there and see how normal it is. Not saying it's defendable, but that's the reality.

If it was theft then Alex here could've easily handled it by DMCA-ing the host. But he knows that's not the case, so he's bringing it to the boards in hope of rattling some chains. Again, I'm not defending the site owner or the designer, I just don't think it's theft and as it turns out neither do most of the people who replied in this thread.

be careful - similar but not the same

Okey, I got ur point. Fuck reality, I belive u won't be happy if someone 'emulates' ur site. If u've got something to emulate of coz :winkwink:

Creative designers/clents :thumbsup

Piss-head emulators :321GFY

Happy? Probably not. But I definitely wouldn't run to the boards and get all pissy about it, accusing people of theft.

Well I think it's definitely up to TS.

I suppose u read my point about theft in this case... so I assume that u didn't even try to create something unique, otherwise u would know how hard to make it...

today was special day ;)

i got 2 urls with similar sites and one designer-task for emulate 3 my other sites )

so my patience finished ;)))))

Assuming doesn't mean knowing. :) However, if it's hard to make something unique or not doesn't give anyone the right to wrongfully call people thieves, nor to insult those who don't agree with them. This is a DISCUSSION board, where grown-ups discuss problems. The rest just resort to insults.

From a legal standpoint you are taking about "Trade dress" and without looking closely at the code, it doesn't appear to even be that close.

Other than the header, I just don't see any evidence of wholesale copyright infringement or trademark/trade dress infringement. The header is close but not even an exact match. The page layout isn't the same. And as a consumer, I would not necessarily believe that these two sites are even related, no less be confused by them.

For trade dress in regards to websites, it really has to be an almost exact duplicate that would cause confusion.

You can call it 'wrongfully' while u don't incur emulate.
I wonder what u say when ur sites start cloning around with 'emulation' sign. Good luck with silence :error

The fact that these two designs are so similar makes the copycat designer look extremely lame. If anything, someone should out the designer that thought it was O.K. to duplicate so many design elements without changing anything. Same colors, same logo style, same positioning, same messaging. Lame! You can be inspired by another design and still do something original. This is many degrees off from being original. IMHO.

I appreciate your "unbiased" opinion. :)

Close but I would not get my panties in a wad.

Just hook up with them for a traffic trade.

I would say it is like someone taking the McDonalds look and putting their own name but keeping font, arches, etc...

That is a copy of the design.