GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Early Iowa #s Show Ron Paul at 11% (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=796858)

notoldschool 01-03-2008 06:10 PM

Early Iowa #s Show Ron Paul at 11%
 
3rd is just like first for Ron Paul.

tblake 01-03-2008 06:13 PM

Yea and beating out Guiliani is certainly going to cause a controversy and get his message out even further. Everyone is going to ask who the hell this guy is once he gets 3rd.

BV 01-03-2008 06:15 PM

Go Ron Go!

BV 01-03-2008 06:17 PM

There will be a lot of people eating crow around here!

VOTE RON PAUL!

Malicious Biz 01-03-2008 06:19 PM


baddog 01-03-2008 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notoldschool (Post 13602835)
3rd is just like first for Ron Paul.

So, he isn't the first place loser, he is the second place loser? How is 3rd like 1st? Just because your Little League coach told you it was, he was only trying to make you feel better.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BV (Post 13602859)
There will be a lot of people eating crow around here!

Really, how many electoral votes do they give third place in Iowa?

collegeboobies 01-03-2008 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 13602874)
So, he isn't the first place loser, he is the second place loser? How is 3rd like 1st? Just because your Little League coach told you it was, he was only trying to make you feel better.



Really, how many electoral votes do they give third place in Iowa?



Iowa has not predicted the winner since Jimmy Carter. And in the primary there are no electoral votes......




GO RON PAUL

BV 01-03-2008 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 13602874)
Quote:
Really, how many electoral votes do they give third place in Iowa?




Just wait pops! Get your George Foreman plugged in and the counter cleaned off. :thumbsup

baddog 01-03-2008 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by collegeboobies (Post 13602883)
Iowa has not predicted the winner since Jimmy Carter. And in the primary there are no electoral votes......




GO RON PAUL

Perhaps electoral votes was the wrong phrase, but I am drawing a blank.

The primaries are so they know how many of their votes will go to which candidate at the RNC/DNC. Some states divide them according to the % you got in the primaries, others are an all or nothing situation.

How does IA do it?

collegeboobies 01-03-2008 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 13602900)
Perhaps electoral votes was the wrong phrase, but I am drawing a blank.

The primaries are so they know how many of their votes will go to which candidate at the RNC/DNC. Some states divide them according to the % you got in the primaries, others are an all or nothing situation.

How does IA do it?



Never looked into how IA does it, since they havent predicted the winner since Jimmy Carter, the first few states for Ron Paul are just to prove he's not a 4% guy like most people claim. It proves people wrong when they attack him as no chance and he ends up doing better than the "people with a chance"

BV 01-03-2008 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by collegeboobies (Post 13602920)
Never looked into how IA does it, since they havent predicted the winner since Jimmy Carter, the first few states for Ron Paul are just to prove he's not a 4% guy like most people claim. It proves people wrong when they attack him as no chance and he ends up doing better than the "people with a chance"

AMEN to that. You took the words right out of my mouth. :thumbsup

Pleasurepays 01-03-2008 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by collegeboobies (Post 13602920)
Never looked into how IA does it, since they havent predicted the winner since Jimmy Carter, the first few states for Ron Paul are just to prove he's not a 4% guy like most people claim. It proves people wrong when they attack him as no chance and he ends up doing better than the "people with a chance"

how does 11% of republican votes in the Iowa caucus equate to "he's not the 4% guy like most people claim" which is a referrence to general popularity nationwide?

baddog 01-03-2008 06:42 PM

I guess my sources are different than notbeentoschool

Mike Huckabee 487 33.4%
W. Mitt Romney 351 24.1%
Fred Thompson 260 17.8%
John McCain 171 11.7%
Ron Paul 154 10.6%
Rudy Giuliani 33 2.3%
Duncan Hunter 3 0.2%
Tom Tancredo 0 0.0%

Source

Is fifth as good as third which is as good as first for Ron Paul?

notoldschool 01-03-2008 06:44 PM

way to wait till the new numbers came out to say shit. What I mean by third as good is first means the media wont be able to ignore him like they do now if he gets third, then everyone will hear his messege.

BV 01-03-2008 06:45 PM

I can tell you one thing, Huckabee is the last person any of us here want in office.

You can take that to the bank and put some in your pipe also!

Pleasurepays 01-03-2008 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 13602969)
I guess my sources are different than notbeentoschool

Mike Huckabee 487 33.4%
W. Mitt Romney 351 24.1%
Fred Thompson 260 17.8%
John McCain 171 11.7%
Ron Paul 154 10.6%
Rudy Giuliani 33 2.3%
Duncan Hunter 3 0.2%
Tom Tancredo 0 0.0%

Source

Is fifth as good as third which is as good as first for Ron Paul?

if theologians can create Biblical Math to make the book of Genesis line up with the Fossile Record... then Ron Paul supporters are entitled to create PaulTard Math to prove he will matter.

baddog 01-03-2008 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notoldschool (Post 13602982)
way to wait till the new numbers came out to say shit. What I mean by third as good is first means the media wont be able to ignore him like they do now if he gets third, then everyone will hear his messege.

And fifth?

Malicious Biz 01-03-2008 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 13602969)

Is fifth as good as third which is as good as first for Ron Paul?

HAHA!:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

dav3 01-03-2008 06:48 PM

That whackjob Huckabee is leading there, so let's not have too much faith in Iowa just yet.

:1orglaugh

TSGlider 01-03-2008 06:53 PM

Good for him. All of you guys who are supporting him better get out there and pound the pavement. He needs all the grassroots help he can get (that isn't an insult, it's the truth).

Pleasurepays 01-03-2008 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dav3 (Post 13603010)
That whackjob Huckabee is leading there, so let's not have too much faith in Iowa just yet.

:1orglaugh

i would consider a mormon to be pretty goofy myself.

i just can't get past that.

Malicious Biz 01-03-2008 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EuroDuke (Post 13603026)
Good for him. All of you guys who are supporting him better get out there and pound the pavement. He needs all the grassroots help he can get (that isn't an insult, it's the truth).

Why do that when they can sit at home and create thread after thread and post after post on GFY?:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

baddog 01-03-2008 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Malicious Biz (Post 13603057)
Why do that when they can sit at home and create thread after thread and post after post on GFY?:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Hey, they are having virtual marches while playing WOW. What else do they need to do?

collegeboobies 01-03-2008 07:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays (Post 13602951)
how does 11% of republican votes in the Iowa caucus equate to "he's not the 4% guy like most people claim" which is a referrence to general popularity nationwide?

A certain Fox News anchor I spoke with predicted Ron Paul at 4% in a conversation with me last week. 11% proves them wrong.

Pleasurepays 01-03-2008 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by collegeboobies (Post 13603094)
A certain Fox News anchor I spoke with predicted Ron Paul at 4% in a conversation with me last week. 11% proves them wrong.



you can't watch FOX News or take them seriously and be a good American

strike 1

collegeboobies 01-03-2008 07:09 PM

so far with 25% in the race for 3rd place is within 3% for a few people.

collegeboobies 01-03-2008 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays (Post 13603106)
you can't watch FOX News and be a good American

strike 1

I spoke with him in person, never said I watch it.

uno 01-03-2008 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notoldschool (Post 13602982)
way to wait till the new numbers came out to say shit. What I mean by third as good is first means the media wont be able to ignore him like they do now if he gets third, then everyone will hear his messege.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

You are hilarious.

Pleasurepays 01-03-2008 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by collegeboobies (Post 13603112)
I spoke with him in person, never said I watch it.

you're still guilty by association.

probably already on the Anne Coulter mailing list.

Pleasurepays 01-03-2008 07:17 PM

oooops!

Ron Paul... now slipping behind Giuliani

baddog 01-03-2008 07:19 PM

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/pri...ults/state/#IA

Looks like Paul is dropping to 6th . . . behind two guys that did not even campaign there.

GatorB 01-03-2008 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays (Post 13603156)
oooops!

Ron Paul... now slipping behind Giuliani

3rd place 13% 6th place 10% not much difference.

GatorB 01-03-2008 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 13603163)
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/pri...ults/state/#IA

Looks like Paul is dropping to 6th . . . behind two guys that did not even campaign there.

Considering that Faux News and other baised idiots according to their "polls" says Paul only had 4% support. Should Thompson be proud of his 3rd place finish with 13%?

uno 01-03-2008 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 13603163)
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/pri...ults/state/#IA

Looks like Paul is dropping to 6th . . . behind two guys that did not even campaign there.

6th is the new 3rd.

Pleasurepays 01-03-2008 07:23 PM

6th place is as good as 5th place, which has already been proven to be as good as 3rd place, which we all know is basically the same as 1st place.

baddog 01-03-2008 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 13603164)
3rd place 13% 6th place 10% not much difference.

So 6th place is as good as 1st for Ron Paul?

Fuzzy math.

baddog 01-03-2008 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 13603175)
Considering that Faux News and other baised idiots according to their "polls" says Paul only had 4% support. Should Thompson be proud of his 3rd place finish with 13%?

At least he is ahead of McCain and Giuliani who did not even campaign there.

ytcracker 01-03-2008 07:26 PM

come on paul

Malicious Biz 01-03-2008 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays (Post 13603186)
6th place is as good as 5th place, which has already been proven to be as good as 3rd place, which we all know is basically the same as 1st place.


Agent 488 01-03-2008 07:49 PM

things would be different if the primary was held in world or warcraft. :2 cents::2 cents::2 cents:

Myst 01-03-2008 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Malicious Biz (Post 13603282)

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Agent 488 01-03-2008 07:51 PM

illuminati voting machines pwned ron paul.

Malicious Biz 01-03-2008 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by budsbabes (Post 13603302)
things would be different if the primary was held in world or warcraft. :2 cents::2 cents::2 cents:

Quote:

Originally Posted by budsbabes (Post 13603311)
illuminati voting machines pwned ron paul.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Pleasurepays 01-03-2008 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ytcracker (Post 13603204)
come on paul

FYI, i had a guy who worked for me a few years ago that started telling me that "there used to be this hacker guy Ytcracker who defaced a lot of high profile websites and he was my hero"

he has never had anything to do with adult... it was just kind of funny.

xxxdesign-net 01-03-2008 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Malicious Biz (Post 13603282)


wow.. you're dedicated.. you create all your material?

ytcracker 01-03-2008 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays (Post 13603358)
FYI, i had a guy who worked for me a few years ago that started telling me that "there used to be this hacker guy Ytcracker who defaced a lot of high profile websites and he was my hero"

he has never had anything to do with adult... it was just kind of funny.

awesome

my legend still reigns

Pleasurepays 01-03-2008 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Malicious Biz (Post 13603282)


Malicious Biz 01-03-2008 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays (Post 13603450)

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

charlie g 01-03-2008 08:48 PM

I am officially changing my support to hucklebee. Not only does he have chuck norris on his side, but also kungfoo jesus, slaying sinners at every turn, and the fox news network. Thumping the good book getting the faithful out to the caucus, he is electable and that's all that matters to me... principles be damned. I am almost tempted to get pleaseurepays off the ignore list so we can high five each other on our great victory. I see malicious chimed in with words of wisdom too.

Vote huckleberry and go to heaven 2008!

Malicious Biz 01-03-2008 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by charlie g (Post 13603528)
I am officially changing my support to hucklebee. Not only does he have chuck norris on his side, but also kungfoo jesus, slaying sinners at every turn, and the fox news network. Thumping the good book getting the faithful out to the caucus, he is electable and that's all that matters to me... principles be damned. I am almost tempted to get pleaseurepays off the ignore list so we can high five each other on our great victory. I see malicious chimed in with words of wisdom too.

Vote huckleberry and go to heaven 2008!

http://swordattheready.files.wordpre...aul-babies.jpg


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123