GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   And The Biggest Fucking Tool On GFY Award Goes To........ (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=796606)

BoyAlley 01-02-2008 09:02 PM

And The Biggest Fucking Tool On GFY Award Goes To........
 
I swear I've seen some fucking tools on GFY but this guy takes the fucking cake.

We all know TheDoc's been firmly attached to TMM John's cock since all this drama started, but talk about taking it up a notch:

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 13595202)
anyone that thinks they will exit nats and find the golden path of perfection isn't getting on cloud9, they rolled up and smoked cloud9.

Any program that drops nats to open a new program/backend will be exploited/hacked within 6 months. Anyone that doesn't agree with that shouldn't open a program.

The only way for a program not to get hacked is to use NATS? Are you fucking kidding me? You do realize how this statement comes across don't you?

If anyone listens to anything that comes out of your mouth at this point they need their fucking heads examined.

You should work for the fucking Bush Administration.

seeric 01-02-2008 09:04 PM

woaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah.

i am teh sexy.


oh


and i like pie.

iSMOKE 01-02-2008 09:04 PM

I still say the award does to Donny Long...

Socks 01-02-2008 09:04 PM

This should get interesting.

BoyAlley 01-02-2008 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Socks (Post 13595278)
This should get interesting.


It's not going to get interesting. A bunch of fucking tools and fake nicks will descend on this thread and it'll be a bunch of retards engaged in a cluster fuck in about 5 minutes.

Talk about a campaign of fear mongering and mis information cripe mighty.

JD 01-02-2008 09:06 PM

i'm a lesbian

Holly 01-02-2008 09:15 PM

I only clicked on this thread to see if it was me.

pip 01-02-2008 09:31 PM

BoyAlley what do you do in the industry ?

TheDoc has done way more than you will ever do.

uno 01-02-2008 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoyAlley (Post 13595273)
The only way for a program not to get hacked is to use NATS? Are you fucking kidding me? You do realize how this statement comes across don't you?

I didn't read that from his statement at all. What it sounds like he's saying is that there is no magic cure and no software is safe or flawless.

aico 01-02-2008 09:49 PM

run him over with your Segway

webgurl 01-02-2008 09:53 PM

first part of the sentence seems accurate but
second part of the sentence could be tweaked slightly :)

design.guru.guy 01-02-2008 09:53 PM

No fair!
 
I want to be GFY's biggest tool! I need to start doing stuff in adult...somebody buy one of my toons yo...just trying to get up to 30 posts so I can actually show you people teh skillz...

-J

mikeyddddd 01-02-2008 09:57 PM


will76 01-02-2008 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pip (Post 13595370)
BoyAlley what do you do in the industry ?

TheDoc has done way more than you will ever do.

so ones "edick" has to be a certain length to be able to ask questions ?

will76 01-02-2008 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aico (Post 13595434)
run him over with your Segway

hey no making fun. :Oh crap

Phil 01-02-2008 10:01 PM

I vote for JaneB or what ever her name

Nismo 01-02-2008 10:01 PM

thank god its not me.

2257 01-02-2008 10:03 PM

http://www.motleycrow.com/ImageHost/crybaby.jpg

sortie 01-02-2008 10:08 PM

All I can say is that, if I were running NATS, I wouldn't get rid of it based on this episode.

minddust 01-02-2008 10:09 PM

Phew!! :1orglaugh

TheDoc 01-02-2008 10:11 PM

This post looks like it went well for you. You should try starting a poll and asking questions about me.

BTW, I own my own backend software too. Man, think of that, I acually have mad experience with my own software, mpa and nats.. who would have thunk it?

TheDoc 01-02-2008 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoyAlley (Post 13595273)
[COLOR="Yellow"]The only way for a program not to get hacked is to use NATS? Are you fucking kidding me? You do realize how this statement comes across don't you?

Sorry I didn't see the question... No, I don't think it comes off that way at all.

I see no problems with the information I stated. The grass isn't greener on the other side. Maybe that is a more clear.

Pipecrew 01-02-2008 10:16 PM

I agree with the Doc, Nats is not perfect, but they have been through so much shit, constantly upgrading/tweaking/learning. All things some guy writing his new software will have to go through, because nothing is perfect, especially in software.

jakethedog 01-02-2008 10:19 PM

Alley .. your alright in my books .. but i had to laugh when i read
And the Biggest Fucking Tool on GFY Award goes to ...... and then i saw your name ..cause you posted it ..

dial 01-02-2008 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uno (Post 13595411)
I didn't read that from his statement at all. What it sounds like he's saying is that there is no magic cure and no software is safe or flawless.

exactly

jesus boyalley, you get worse as the days go on, did you forget your meds again...or maybe you actually did sell your nick to european lee

BoyAlley 01-02-2008 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pip (Post 13595370)
BoyAlley what do you do in the industry ?

I own an AVS site. :thumbsup

BoyAlley 01-02-2008 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoyAlley (Post 13595279)

It's not going to get interesting. A bunch of fucking tools and fake nicks will descend on this thread and it'll be a bunch of retards engaged in a cluster fuck in about 5 minutes.

Talk about a campaign of fear mongering and mis information cripe mighty.

Look look! I are psychic!

dial 01-02-2008 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoyAlley (Post 13595715)
Look look! I are psychic!

except that you are the one that is initially spreading the mis-information by not properly translating what was written

you took it as "everything but nats has security problems", when EVERYONE else saw it as "EVERYTHING has security problems"

idiot

BoyAlley 01-02-2008 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dial (Post 13595719)
you took it as "everything but nats has security problems"

Quote:

Any program that drops nats to open a new program/backend will be exploited/hacked within 6 months. Anyone that doesn't agree with that shouldn't open a program.
:error:error:error:error

TheDoc 01-03-2008 12:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoyAlley (Post 13595724)
:error:error:error:error

Errors suck, security errors really suck, lets get rid of these errors. You should setup an SSL Cert on your Program. So Webmasters can signup with ssn's and edit them, and be safe. And so Admins can log in and not get punked.

Security starts with securing yourself, even the small stuff counts.

dial 01-03-2008 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoyAlley (Post 13595724)
:error:error:error:error

you quoted exactly what I said

anyone that moves from nats to another piece of software will be exploited, that is just the name of the game

he should have put in there, anyone that moves from nats will STILL be exploited

but then again, some people prefer not to dumb their speech down for the idiots

if you want to have everything dumbed down watch NBC

Kevsh 01-03-2008 12:33 AM

I love when someone feels their opinion is so important that simply replying in the original thread won't do ...

:thumbsup

SmokeyTheBear 01-03-2008 12:40 AM

well i have to admit that post was a bit strange but it was kinda taken out of context.

i think thedoc has been the most polite/straightforward of the nats cheering section. obviously he has some bias , but in general i think he has laid everything out fairly straightforward , perhaps with a bit of spin here and there but i think he has been fair

his point was no software is invulernable , this is true , i think how vulnerabilities are reported is also very important..

on one hand i tend to agree that this sort of thing can happen to anyone , on the other hand this wasnt a "hack" , this should never have happened.

the nats software did not get hacked .. nats got hacked , the software performed exactly how it was supposed to perform with a nats admin logged in. ( i should add only pertaining to the email data that was stolen )

dial 01-03-2008 12:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear (Post 13596015)
well i have to admit that post was a bit strange but it was kinda taken out of context.

i think thedoc has been the most polite/straightforward of the nats cheering section. obviously he has some bias , but in general i think he has laid everything out fairly straightforward , perhaps with a bit of spin here and there but i think he has been fair

his point was no software is invulernable , this is true , i think how vulnerabilities are reported is also very important..

on one hand i tend to agree that this sort of thing can happen to anyone , on the other hand this wasnt a "hack" , this should never have happened.

the nats software did not get hacked .. nats got hacked , the software performed exactly how it was supposed to perform with a nats admin logged in. ( i should add only pertaining to the email data that was stolen )

finally, someone with a fucking brain in this thread

DaddyHalbucks 01-03-2008 12:41 AM

I enjoy pie also.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123