![]() |
Australia ISPs will have to filter porn ....
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asi...ic/7165987.stm
Quote:
Curious wont be able to look at his own sites!! (JK He can opt out) |
Omg We Need To Protect Teh Children!!!!
|
"The minister stressed that if people equated freedom of speech with watching child pornography then he would always disagree with them."
Are they talking about filtering porn or just child porn. Is he is equating child porn with regular porn? |
He is, and he did.
|
This is TOTALLY fucked.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2...31/2129471.htm Happy new year fellow aussies - we now join the ranks of china and the middle eastern block. Here we were bitching about 2257!!! :S |
OH SHITT!!!
what a way to hit 2008! |
Damian does the UK have something similar to this already in place?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
It's all in the name of "children"
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
There's already legislation for opt-in filtering that came in around the end of the 1990s, but it was so technically nonviable that it didn't seem to go anywhere.
Filtering is a fine balance between outraged parents and excessive collateral damage. A computer program is not a replacement for proper parental supervision. It is still a difficult technical issue. This will fail just like the other law did, but it will still be yahoo'd about at every opportunity so that Australians think the govt is taking care of them. |
Quote:
This development is wrong on so many levels it is staggering! Where is our constitution embodying free speech when we need it!! |
Quote:
I thought howard was ultra conservative but this is just so over the top its embarrassing. |
ouch...
:Oh crap |
This effects everyone with English speaking traffic, you will roughly lose 2-8% of your traffic (australian surfers - numbers guessed based on our traffic)
Some maybe lots more! |
I'm sure the voters will eat it up.
|
Quote:
|
yay! more responsibility taken away from the parents.
|
sucks to be australian. Im sure huckabee or romney will accomplish alot more in a short time.
|
That's just retarded... but it's how politicians choose to tackle the issue - it's not like they've seen their "moral" voters be against such "solutions".
Seems rather typical of "better-than-thou"/"higher moral valuing" people to be clueless on how the internet works, and who's to blame... like the internet is broadcasted/"push content" as opposed to "pull content", pff! What's gotta happen is; both politicians and people need education around these matters, or all-&-ANY adult goes into a mandatory,web-coexisting, opt-in protocol (like http://XXX.porn.com ). The first method just isn't happening, we've all learnt that the past.. what, 5 years? The second method... I think the industry really needs to both propose, back & push it! Or else we'll be stuck with stupid decisions like this worldwide soon. |
This is only the start, the more tube sites showing full pornos to anyone with the click of a mouse. Plan on more and more countries doing this. Now to me I think instead of doing this they should make it law you got kids you have to have a filter on your system.
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:59 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123