![]() |
So who thinks minusonebit/Keith Kimmel is a religious nutjob tool with an agenda?
So who thinks minusonebit/Keith Kimmel is a religious nutjob tool with an agenda?
Anyone here want to vouch that the guy has sent them any noticeable amount of traffic? Anyone here want to vouch that they have hired him to do anything? Here are his two most noted adult industry activities to date: (1) Made available hundreds of webmasters' epass login info. (2) Put out an incredibly misleading press release suggesting that 95% of adult websites use NATS and that the recent alleged NATS data leak included all customers' credit card information. Something about the whole NATS witchhunt and the way minusonebit was chortling on Slashdot about how neither TMM or the adult industry would ever recover from his smear job raised my hackles. So I read Keith Kimmel's resume on his web site. As near as I can tell, he currently has a lot of paper routes. His previous work experience is customer support. There is nothing to imply that he has ever been a webmaster of any kind, mainstream or adult. His one claim to fame appears to be having persecuted a local, I kid you not, pizza parlor in Ohio. (I mean persecuted and not prosecuted.) I'm not sure if minusonebit/Kimmel's motivation is religious in nature or some other message transmitted via microwave to tinfoil hat, but he appears to be deliberately trying to sabotage our industry. He applauds the Unabomber on one of his sites and his threads on GFY seem not just intended to annoy, but to damage. The guy brags about his lawsuit Kimmel v Ulrey Foods d/b/a Flyers Pizza like it makes him a paladin white knight. He seems to have some kind of savior complex and it strikes me that he is freaked out about pictures, text, and video of people, you know, doing it and is doing his darnedest to make publication of such materials less profitable. |
Quote:
PS: Merry Christmas! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
My personal opinion is that I don't think he's the one that did the damage. :2 cents: |
I think he's a crusader of some kind, and John pressed his buttons by declaring war against him (threatening to sue him) for his comments. Why would you want to antagonize someone like that Amelia? You know it just brings a lot of unnecessary headache and negativity your way. I think everyone should just ignore it and not fuel that fire.
Happy Holidays. |
I guess I can look forward to amusing myself for many days to come with all of GFY's crazy theories about why I do things. This one is pretty fun. I don't think I have ever been called a religious nut before even by a retard.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You are also right that I should just ignore it because it is likely to only get more annoying. When it was just posts on GFY, I did ignore it. But I just couldn't let it pass when he started posting such misleading nonsense about the whole industry on non-industry sites. People could actually believe the nonsense he is spreading and that could be really damaging to all of us. |
Quote:
|
it's getting better all the time
|
somebody should pay him so he would just keep his mouth shut and consider it "The Glass Insurance"
;) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
john pushed the buttons of a wrong guy. lot of time on his hands, doesnt care about his reputation, and seems to like all of the attention
sort of reminds me about will and zango/aff |
Quote:
|
Well obviously you don't work in the industry as you're trying to make the most damage possible. You also have way too much time on your hands and probably live in your mom's basement.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
;) http://blogs.reuters.com/wp-content/...cissors360.jpg |
never heard him mention religion but he has one helluva big mouth
|
Quote:
|
i like elephants. i think they are thexy :)
|
He is truly delusional. He lives in a fucked up fantasyworld.
The guy seriously thinks i stopped posting for 3 weeks on gfy after he threatened to beat me up. Thats sick. He just made that up in his mind and from that day on believes it. And i noticed more stuff like that coming from him. I am pretty damn sure he has some kind of illness. |
he's a true Internet kook and I feel sorry for John and anybody else who has to deal with him - actually he's worse than your average Internet kook because looking at his background he's a kook in the real world too. He obviously has nothing but time on his hands and what he's doing here - causing shit and getting attention is what he lives for.
Eric needs to ban him tomorrow - he is bad news and he has absolutely nothing to do with this industry other than he thinks he's found a home here where he can get a lot of attention - this NATS story to him is his 'big break' in his Internet kook career. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think you all are under estimating this guy. He clearly has a lot of background sueing people from the info that was posted here and what he has on his blog. It seems to me he baited John into this (which wasn't hard to do). I wouldn't be surprised if he has a thought out plan. I bet this is going to get ugly for both parties, and us if minusonebit keeps up the mainstream media assult. |
Quote:
Lot of time on my hands?? yeah thats funny I probably work on average about 80 hours a week but since i post about 3 - 5 hours a week on avg here I must have a lot of time on my hands :upsidedow. AT MY EXPENSE I got less work done those couple weeks I was posting about zango to try to educate you people. Like attention? I could really give a shit. Unfortunetly the only way to inform people about how they are getting fucked is to make posts to lots of people. If anyone wants to make posts for me so they can get all the " attention" please contact me and i will feed shit for you to post. I could give a fuck about attention. that's why you see all those posts from me about all the nice shit i own or how i blew money on this or that or banged this chick :upsidedow And to the smart assholes that will say that is because I am broke, I make more than about 98%. Also, notice all those fake drama threads I start every day. :upsidedow But thanks for thinking of me and what minusonebit is doing as something similar. :Oh crap |
Quote:
No baiting of John. Unless you consider calling John on his stupidity baiting him. I saw the issue on Gay Main Street where one of the admins had tacked up a notice about it and a link to the OC3 Networks thread here. I read the thread, saw some of John's assine comments and how he simply didn't seem to fucking care about the fact that his incompetence had just resulted in a breach of my data and that of others. I got pissed off, John tried to strong arm me and then (wisely) backed off when he saw it wasn't going to work. The rest of the industry proceeded to try and save John from me (and still is trying to do that) by strong arming me and thinking that it can dig up "dirt" on me and publish it here and that by doing so I will get mad and run away, so the industry made itself a target as a whole and I went from a simple search and destroy mission into a full fledged war. We not sit at full war status right now. I can confirm four things at this time:
|
wow
i was gone for a week and come back to this? :/ |
He runs these websites and they produce 95% of his income:
4noc.com Amcstuff.com Aoae.org Aoae.us Boycottgeneralmotors.com Boycottonstar.com Bscourier.com Decaybuffet.com Denofdarkness.com Dontbuygm.com Eternalnap.com Gmprivacy.com Goddamnit.us Godlie.us Houseofsurplus.com Icwt.us Icwtstore.com Icwtstore.us Indianaspam.com Justaddmaggots.com Keithkimmel.com Kkbuys.com Kkpost.com Laportesucks.com Localgayguys.com Nationalhotelreview.com Neustarlawsuit.com Onstardatatheft.com Onstarprivacy.com Onstarsecurity.com Pornstarcatalog.com Suspendedebayseller.com Synergyglobalnetworks.com Thisisarecording.com Unitedpackagesmashers.com Ushotelreview.com |
Quote:
Speaking only for myself, I did not try to "save" John. I tried to educate you on what NATS is and what was and was not at risk. You stooped immediately to calling me names, refusing to explain how you were coming to your wrong conclusions, and chortling about how you hoped the whole industry would suffer for the error of one company. I assume you were referring to others re: the supposed dirt. I hardly think it is dirt to point out that you are a paper boy and not a webmaster and that is why you do not understand what the actual security issue was or is or who it applied to. If you are not an anti-industry nutjob with an agenda, why try to hurt the businesses of people who do not even use NATS? |
Quote:
|
The best thing is to put him on ignore, be indifferent to his antics. By replying to him, you are all justifying his existence (in his mind) and giving his life 'meaning'.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
He sounds like an ignorant moron, but I haven't seen him spout anything religious on this board. Which is odd considering the link between ignorance and religion is pretty strong.
|
Quote:
... check it out. |
Quote:
...YOU are the retard. :2 cents: |
Quote:
Now USA Today kicked off an article saying, "Porn aficionados: Your personal information may be at risk." That means your misleading barrage of disinformation is making people think the issue is far more widespread than NATS installs would actually make it. Shame on you, Keith Kimmel/minusonebit, for hurting totally uninvolved parties. You clearly didn't care about TMM or NATS. You just wanted to damage the industry. If you don't claim the religious nutjob excuse, then you are just a bad person for hurting innocent people to stroke your own ego. |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:29 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123