Over/Under on how hard Minusonebrain gets ass raped by TMM?
 

What's your guess? I sure as fuck hope John and his boys sue the living shit out of this kid, and don't stop till his parents ground him from the internets.

what are they gonna sue him for?

*rolleyes*


a more realistic scenario would be hiring some thugs and sending them over for a "chat"

Ya for the ASS Raped

What is TMM gonna sue minusonebrain for? how about libel? hes running around all over the place spreading lies about the company.

How about the class action lawsuit he says hes starting? hes no way affected by the whole NATS ordeal, hes not even in this industry, hes a fucking sig whore.

the burden on a plaintiff in a libel or slander suit is heavy - you need to prove malice and minusonetwit I think has displayed an enormous amount of that - the other burden is to prove he fabricated things - i haven't read all his posts so I don't know to what extent he's done that.

I'm going with over for the ass raping...over and over and over. :1orglaugh

Libel, fake lawsuit, slander, etc. Are you seriously that ignorant?

I mean...if this were a NFL game....i would go with

-175 (in NATS favor) by the bookmakers

& then I would buy 50+ points

What lies? Up untill now all i've read from him regarding TTM was true.


So? You cant sue someone just because he is annoying you.

Yes, you can. Last time I checked that's called harassment.

I have the lawyers winning.

Libel = you have a single proof? Post a link.

Fake Lawsuit = LOL, you cant sue someone because he is threatening to sue you. Besides, how do you know it's fake?

Slander = Look up a definition for it.

etc. = ???

it's all BS now carry on

You truly are that ignorant. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

libel per se - broadcast or written publication of a false statement about another which accuses him/her of a crime, immoral acts, inability to perform his/her profession, having a loathsome disease (like syphilis), or dishonesty in business. Such claims are considered so obviously harmful that malice need not be proved to obtain a judgment for "general damages," and not just specific losses

lol ur a joke

I am a user on several sites that run NATS. My privacy has been breached due to his incompetence. He did not notify me. I have standing to bring suit.