OOOh let's all run out and sign up to process with TMMSegpay!
 

Hi BA!!!!!
I am here.

You're pathetic. I should have realized your track record spoke for you and not tried to look at you outside of that as I did.

You're on ignore now where you belong.

Hey maybe you can jump in the middle of an already critical issue and try and involve yourself with a bunch of new threads acting like a self appointed industry advocated, again.

Oh, you're already there. Never mind.

If I have to see the word "teh" by BA and everyone else who jumped on that bandwagon one more F'N time I'm gonna go skydiving without a parachute :321GFY

Been wanting to say that for awhile now but kept forgetting :upsidedow

Now as for this thread, suggesting not to use a processor over potential security flaws, that's stupid. The risk exists with ANY processor I can name, ESPECIALLY if it happens to be an inside job by an employee (would be the easiest situation). There are employees of processors that steal and sell data for their own personal benefit pretty often I can assure you (if you think mailers who have access to great CC lists get them from hacking processors/sites, many times you are wrong. They simply split the cash with an employee of said processors) :2 cents:

Stop trying to be such an attention whore BA - isn't already acting flamboyantly gay enough for that ??

Hold Up> Im really missing something. Do you actually own a program running nats? Or do you just promote them? Either way wtf?

Just as safe as any other processor...

Except EPOCH...

That's pretty pathetic. BA on ignore now. :2 cents:

So what are you saying about Epoch/Paycom?... They are not safe?