GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   How many programs will start dropping NATS !!! (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=794165)

Gordon G 12-22-2007 10:40 AM

How many programs will start dropping NATS !!!
 
Do you think any ?

BVF 12-22-2007 10:41 AM

And risk the wrath of webmasters having to change their links yet again?

Dirty F 12-22-2007 10:42 AM

As always, very little.

Every 6 months or so something big like this happens. Everybody goes nuts. Everybody is pissed and in 2 months from now everybody is happily using Nats as if nothing happened.

master_design 12-22-2007 10:43 AM

Why? what's the problem with NATS?:question

Dirty F 12-22-2007 10:44 AM

Look at GTS and the shit they pulled a while back. So many people said how they were digusted by Mark and GTS. It was 15 pages of people telling them to fuck off and what an idiots they are. And look now. Nobody cares anymore. Everyone is hitting them up to buy spots etc.

Karupted Charles 12-22-2007 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F (Post 13551220)
As always, very little.

Every 6 months or so something big like this happens. Everybody goes nuts. Everybody is pissed and in 2 months from now everybody is happily using Nats as if nothing happened.

Wow for once we agree. People are more afraid of changing links then any security issue. Ofcource there are easy ways to redirect the nats codes to a new system like we did when we dropped them. I believe Greeguy and Jim worked out a redirect also when they dropped them around the same time.

Dirty F 12-22-2007 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by master_design (Post 13551224)
Why? what's the problem with NATS?:question

:1orglaugh

ShotGun 12-22-2007 10:47 AM

None. Most webmasters can't be bothered by things like this. Most program owners are too lazy to be bothered with switching programs.

Dirty F 12-22-2007 10:48 AM

oops, wrong thread.

Walrus 12-22-2007 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by master_design (Post 13551224)
Why? what's the problem with NATS?:question

Tracking problems. PanchoDog even made a statement about it on here. They now offer webmasters both the option for CCBill and Nats. Before they just had Nats.

Dirty F 12-22-2007 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Karupted Charles (Post 13551231)
Wow for once we agree. People are more afraid of changing links then any security issue. Ofcource there are easy ways to redirect the nats codes to a new system like we did when we dropped them. I believe Greeguy and Jim worked out a redirect also when they dropped them around the same time.

And when exactly you dont agree with me?

Gordon G 12-23-2007 01:12 AM

bump for NATS.

SiMpLe 12-23-2007 01:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Karupted Charles (Post 13551231)
Wow for once we agree. People are more afraid of changing links then any security issue. Ofcource there are easy ways to redirect the nats codes to a new system like we did when we dropped them. I believe Greeguy and Jim worked out a redirect also when they dropped them around the same time.

Redirecting works, we've done it for ccbill, epoch and nats. Never once asked any of our affiliates to change links when we've added other programs. :thumbsup

HouseHead 12-23-2007 01:35 AM

fook nats


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123