whats wrong ?
 

hi.
can you people tell whats wrong with my galleries ? I have a list of about forty tgp-s I submit my galleries to, but they dont seem to post them, can you tell why ?

here are some sample urls:
http://chicks-love-dicks.com/ah/index1.links1.1.shtml
http://chicks-love-dicks.com/ld/index1.links1.1.shtml
http://chicks-love-dicks.com/io/index1.links1.1.shtml

thanks-a-lot.

nice gallery I think

needed to horiz scroll , too much bullshit text , blue on that BG looks blurred to some people. Cut down on the shit center it in 800 and lose the blue text.

The gallery takes a week to load (using dial up), way to much text. And you didn't build the gallery it was pre-made.

I built a template first. I wrote script that automatically pastes links and pics and generates gallery from templates, but it doesnt really make a difference, does it ?

unlicensed/stolen content

its hosted at Autson.com, I thought its fast enough, can you recommend some better hosting ?

Also many TGPs look down on that whole click for more stuff.

It does to some Tgp owners, you could tell the gallers were generated by the URL.

thumbs are 'huge'. surfers don't care when the gallery was generated. lesbians on a chicks-love-dick domain. 'go back to main page' - misleading text according to some TGPs - the surfer thinks the main page is what they clicked on to get to your gallery, not your main page.

this image is broken (as is its thumbnail):

http://chicks-love-dicks.com/ld/arch...s/1659b002.jpg

(i didn't check the other galleries, just the middle one)

- "Generated on"... no one cares. Shows that you didn't make the gallery and smells of an auto-maker/submitter

- Thumbs are way too big. I'm all for big thumbs but 222+ is ridiculous.

- Can't see the thumbs on the first fold of the screen at 800x600

- Horizontal scrolling on 800x600

- Some thumbs and pics are screwed up from the batch process (see last thumb on second gallery)

- All three of them look exactly the same. Same layout, same colors.

- "main page" and "more" links. Big no-no.

- Names of the pictures (0017.jpg) - ugh.

- Free content which is obviously free thanks to the big watermark on the pics.

- Between the huge-ass sponsor graphic at the top and the too-large 10k thumbs, that page is 190k to load... and they haven't even seen their first big pic yet.

- Just saw a big pic of 889x795. You must be kidding, right?

- On a selling point, the surfer can center his browser on the pics (besides the fact that he has to scroll back and forth) and not even have to *see* your advertising.

- Do you think you could possibly give away any more big, clear, hardcore insertion pics? Your surfer has no reason whatsoever to go to your sponsor - he can start and finish whacking off by the time he gets through your gallery. You've even got the money shot at the end to help finish him off.

hahah, thank you, thank you ! anything else ? :) so what are the best thumbs/pics sizes (kb/pixels) ?

Those images are probably stolen, unless you can buy from Suze Randall, Private and Color Climax.

The TGP site owners might have spotted it and seen you for what you are, "Proberly"

I would not worry about why those pages are not accepted, I just stuck APIC onto you.:321GFY

We shooters spend a lot of time and money creating content to SELL and not for free loading guys like you to steal.:ak47:

Let's see what this does for my standing in the GFY community??? But if he steals from one he will steal from you.:thumbsup