Photochop or not?
 

photoShop

I voted no because they could have had one of those blue things film makers use. It may be photochopped but I think its just one of those blue things which would not be a photochop.

A blue screen?

Ya, but nots a "screen". Just a stip of blue where they are standing.:thumbsup

Invisible bridges for naked people are real.. It's just that the evil Bush administration has suppressed their existence to everyone except the global elitists of the Illuminati.

Chop was my vote. All of their feet are at a perfect horizontal. If there were a strip or some other tech used, the structure would have to have a crapload of steps at awkward levels. Probably be a bitch to walk on.

I would think any arch that small would originally have been a fairly smooth curve.

Not a photochop.

It's a Spencer Tunick picture taken in Amsterdam earlier this year

http://www.thespencertunickexperience.org/

I'll post the answer later on when more people have had a vote. :winkwink:

way to fuck up a thread ben, nice one jack ass.

Chop I think.

Oh my, haven't thought of that, it looked too perfect to be true.

No, its not.

You asked a fucking question so I fucking answered it.

I had no idea you knew the answer so :321GFY

I would say no also

It's pretty obvious I'd know the answer if I were posting it in a poll, otherwise people who really wanted to know the answer at the end would be pissed.

Mental note, ragecash ben isn't too smart.

i do not think that it is pchop. nothing is real or manual anymore - it is all cgi!

What ever you say genius. :thumbsup

lmao. glad that's cleared up.

where are you anyway Ben, not up in Qld is it? I'm stuck in rainy Sydney town. crappy weather all month :disgust

Beautiful one day, perfect the next :winkwink:

only gfy can turn a question such as this into an argument.

nvm I take that back, I see it all the time all over the net.

anyway, yeah there are lots of ways to do it, the best of them are probably written above me.... cool pic though.

Spencer Tunick does some wacky stuff.

I'm somewhere in this picture, circa 1998
http://www.picpulse.com/tunick.jpg

real, that is a bridge made of naked women. testament to the power of the arch. note the tall white chick in the middle as the archstone and the 2 heavy anchors on either side


http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...ion.svg/200px-
Arch: Schematic illustration of an arch.
Note: This is a general representation of the proportions and technical elements.

Keystone
Voussoir
Back
Impost
Intrados
Rise
Clear span, "Bay"
Abutment

Riiiiight. I say trick since I see little dots under each of their feet an a flash of white for no reason here and there.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

lol. that's the first thing I thought of when I saw it - they must have lowered everyone into place. one wrong move they all end up in the drink.

The arch is behind their lower backs, and you can see where the arch connects on either side of the water, They are also standing on platforms connected to the arch that are hidden by their legs.

http://www.thespencertunickexperienc..._7_Frankvn.jpg

You bunch of spoilers you....

Here's more of one: https://youtube.com/v/zUqcOOK73Jw&rel=1

Interesting stuff.

After all the yacking and spoilers, still 57% got it wrong :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

choppie, choppie

not a chop,

nice one couldn´t spot that on the original

They need to shave their pussy's... :2 cents:

obviously photoshopped

Looks like a picture from the movie" Perfume":pimp

I have no idea, but it looks cool!