GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Anyone know why the real estate market is so bad? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=784187)

clickhappy 11-12-2007 08:35 PM

Anyone know why the real estate market is so bad?
 
It doesnt make sense to me. Unemployment is down, so people are working. Rates are lower than 6% and that is low.

I understand that things would slow down from too much appreciation of the past few years, but I dont get why its this bad. Nothing is selling, no one is buying and prices are dropping like crazy.

baddog 11-12-2007 08:41 PM

I believe there was some talk about mortgages people couldn't afford . . . not sure though.

DateDoc 11-12-2007 08:42 PM

The predictions are another 18 mos of decline in valuation too. A lot of the reason for the decline is because ppl bought more house than they could afford and were given loans to buy those homes when they really should not have qualified. This caused a lot of ppl with ARMs on homes with monthly payments increasing drastically as the rate increased. Since they cannot afford their home anymore they put it up for sale. More ppl did this and there are more homes for sale than there are buyers thus pricing goes down.

Pricing drops and RE investors stop buying too. They will buy when the market reaches bottom and make a killing but we are not there yet. Not many investors want to buy something that will be worth less in a year even if they are investing long term. Why pay 400k for your 10 yr investment when next yr you can pay maybe 350k-360k?

FreeHugeMovies 11-12-2007 08:43 PM

Higher rates, then all those companies were cooking the books on the mortgage applications etc etc.

Megafoo 11-12-2007 08:46 PM

the realestate market and its bubble finally popped! It NEVER should have gone that high in the first place. Just like everything in this economy it was basically fixed, first it started to rise because the people that could afford it and had the legitimate credit could afford to pay thier bills. Combine that will low interest rates after the turn of the century everyone was buying up. Then mortgage companies started to get into riskier loans to keep it going, sub prime loads people that either really couldnt afford it..or looked like they could on paper but didnt have the credit for it were given loans normally they shouldnt have been qualified for. Now the market is tapped out, and everyone that shouldn't have gotten loans are starting to default on their payments because of the economy and interest..BOOM instant flood of house back on the market.and everyone that was building houses late in the game only added to the problem.

Just because everyone has jobs doesnt mean everyone has GOOD jobs. most jobs that are being created are low end jobs. Combine that with oil prices and inflation because of that. You have the makings of a bad situation.

GregE 11-12-2007 08:58 PM

The problem started when there were more houses for sale than there were people who wanted to buy them. The old supply and demand thing.

Then, the credit crunch came and even the people who still wanted to buy (or most of them anyway) couldn't.

That's when the free fall began.

GreyWolf 11-12-2007 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by clickhappy (Post 13365571)
It doesnt make sense to me. Unemployment is down, so people are working. Rates are lower than 6% and that is low.

I understand that things would slow down from too much appreciation of the past few years, but I dont get why its this bad. Nothing is selling, no one is buying and prices are dropping like crazy.

Credit crunch clickhappy - triggered by predatory lending by financial institutions to people who had little hope of paying a mortgage. The home market accouts for almost a quarter of the economy - so everything from construction to retail etc will be hit.

Banks have now tightened up lending critera after having lost billions (and many billions to go yet). The next problem is going to be from people who did pay their mortgages, but want refinancing out of adjustable rate mortgages - it's going to be generally harder for them to refinance.

Sure.. unemployment looks OK, but there is just not enough liquidity around and less retail spending - a vicious cycle.

Meanwhile, the home constuction industry is in for a longish time of bad news. There is almost a years worth of 'home stock' on the market now and little chance of it being sold soon - and this is increasing weekly as further foreclosures are processed.

There have been around 750billion worth of foreclosures so far and roughly another trillion expected.

Bottom line - it's the worst real estate scenario since the depression and ripples everywhere and creates a lack of confidence - hence the dollar and oil problems etc.

LiveDose 11-12-2007 09:05 PM

Great time to be a buyer. We are looking at 2 houses right now...

GreyWolf 11-12-2007 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LiveDose (Post 13365674)
Great time to be a buyer. We are looking at 2 houses right now...

Patience can be more profitable :)

No point in buying now then watching your asset decrease further :thumbsup

Dave Foster 11-12-2007 09:24 PM

Is it because of the tube/torrent sites?? It seems that because of them the whole world is collapsing (according to some) :upsidedow

slapass 11-12-2007 09:26 PM

buying now too. They have a positive cash flow so even if it falls further I can hold on.

$5 submissions 11-12-2007 09:29 PM

Besides the subprime fiasco, many banks are smarting from that experience are now tightening up even on people with GOOD CREDIT.

After Shock Media 11-12-2007 09:32 PM

Who says unemployment is down? The Government?
They cook those numbers more than many sub prime lenders.

brand0n 11-12-2007 09:41 PM

zango...

ianlester 11-12-2007 09:48 PM

in typical south park fashion... "Blame Canada"

Ron Bennett 11-12-2007 09:49 PM

As long as illegals (and semi-Americans from U.S. territories, such as Puerto Rico) keep streaming into the U.S. in large numbers, the long-term future for U.S. real estate is fantastic!

Short-term, this is a correction - it will be painful ... commercial real estate is still doing decent, but that will likely get hit hard too come next year - but will correct within a year or so afterwards, but I digress.

Consider this ... it's widely projected that 100 Million more people in the U.S. by 2030 at current growth rates...

Heck, even if one is super-pessimistic and it's only 25 million more, that's still a heck of lot of people who are going to need housing, need stores, etc.

Rambling on ... anyways, as many have already pointed out, main reasons are prices went up too fast compounded by a severe credit crunch.

The time to truly worry, as in sell and move out of the country, is when the "illegals", etc stop coming in / many people leave for other countries - as of now, there's no indication of that happening ... if anything, more people than ever are coming into the U.S. - they all need somewhere to live!

And as that 'ol saying goes, they ain't making any more land ... well, ok that's mostly true - there are a few exceptions like Dubai, which are building and developing man made islands.

Ron

JohnnyJames 11-12-2007 09:54 PM

All of the above and one factor that has been, thus far, overlooked.

Investors. Behind those mortgage companies (predators and nonpredatory ones) and banks, are the moneymen. When mortgage and RE portfolios and bundled products containing them began to drop in value, they took a hard look at banking and lending practices of the last few years.

The rate of foreclosures began to skyrocket, and probably will continue for some time, leading the investors behind the scenes to tighten the screws on how much exposure they wanted to a dwindling asset. That means less money on the market for new mortgages and less money for existing companies to fund even their day to day operations, things like rent on office space, employees, phones. It was a perfect disaster waiting to happen, created in fact, by the very people who ended up going broke-the mortgage lenders and bankers.

Of course it is a LOT more complicated than that, with hidden players in every corner either counting their losses or licking their wounds.

GreyWolf 11-12-2007 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnnyJames (Post 13365802)
All of the above and one factor that has been, thus far, overlooked.

Investors. Behind those mortgage companies (predators and nonpredatory ones) and banks, are the moneymen. When mortgage and RE portfolios and bundled products containing them began to drop in value, they took a hard look at banking and lending practices of the last few years.

The rate of foreclosures began to skyrocket, and probably will continue for some time, leading the investors behind the scenes to tighten the screws on how much exposure they wanted to a dwindling asset. That means less money on the market for new mortgages and less money for existing companies to fund even their day to day operations, things like rent on office space, employees, phones. It was a perfect disaster waiting to happen, created in fact, by the very people who ended up going broke-the mortgage lenders and bankers.

Of course it is a LOT more complicated than that, with hidden players in every corner either counting their losses or licking their wounds.

You noticed what the banks and brokerage corps are doing now? Decorating what they describe as "prime investments" and repackaging these CDO's and trying to offload them on to unsuspecting investors. When you look at the composition of these bonds - they contain a high percentage of sub-prime mortgage problems and fat chance of an investor actually gaining by purchasing them.

Typical example are CDO-based hedge funds from Bear Stearns which have been reported to be worthless. There is also a rising conflict of interest with rating agencies who value these CDO's - they same rating agencies are supported financially by the industry selling them. Due dilligence is missing.

Bottom line - financial institutions are trying to offload the problem they created on to unsuspecting investors - yet another time-bomb waiting to blow.

Megafoo 11-12-2007 11:11 PM

probably the biggest most complicated 'get rich quick' schemes to hit the u.S. in a long time :) Go republicans!

Iron Fist 11-12-2007 11:11 PM

I'm sure the government will bail them out like they bail out every crybaby industry losing money.

Shagbunny 11-13-2007 01:05 AM

oh don't get me started :upsidedow

Violetta 11-13-2007 01:25 AM

ups and downs... always ups and downs! :)

SomeCreep 11-13-2007 01:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by clickhappy (Post 13365571)
It doesnt make sense to me. Unemployment is down, so people are working. Rates are lower than 6% and that is low.

I understand that things would slow down from too much appreciation of the past few years, but I dont get why its this bad. Nothing is selling, no one is buying and prices are dropping like crazy.

Lets see.. Basically, it's a long story. Stay away and you'll be fine.

GatorB 11-13-2007 01:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by clickhappy (Post 13365571)
It doesnt make sense to me. Unemployment is down, so people are working. Rates are lower than 6% and that is low.

I understand that things would slow down from too much appreciation of the past few years, but I dont get why its this bad. Nothing is selling, no one is buying and prices are dropping like crazy.

Sub prime moratages, places willing to lend money to people without any sort of credit check or even checking to see if someone actually had a job, idiots speculating in real estate buying vast amounts then having trouble unloading properties before the mortages are due.

teomaxxx 11-14-2007 04:50 AM

from http://seekingalpha.com/article/5381...-subprime-risk
"If you know anything about the subprime mortgage crisis, know this: the hundreds of billions of dollars in losses incurred by banks, investors, home owners and others largely are due to government intervention in the private market for home loans going back decades. You can blame the mortgage bankers or ratings analysts or Sell Side traders for the subprime mess, but deregulation, active encouragement by regulators of bank dealing in derivatives, and policy efforts like the push for "affordable housing," are the root causes of the crisis.

An unholy alliance between the real estate, mortgage lending and securities industries, the "men" in Orwell's wonderful quotation, and the Washington political and regulatory elite, obviously the "pigs," has brought the US economy, the dollar and millions of Americans to the verge of a serious financial calamity. The mounting financial crisis emanating from the collapse of the market for complex structured assets also illustrates the huge damage done to the US economy by a financial culture which lacks accountability. The banksters and their political patrons on Capitol Hill profit enormously during boom times, but when the wheels fall off the wagon, the Masters of the Universe scurry back to Washington looking for a public bailout.
..................................
Today bankers privatize the profits and socialize the losses, to paraphrase Jim Grant. Imagine how different the behavior of the largest, universal banks would be today were the officers, directors and senior managers required to keep most of their net worth invested in their employers equity



.....................

Diligent 11-14-2007 04:54 AM

That's a really good question... this will be interesting

teomaxxx 11-14-2007 06:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media (Post 13365746)
Who says unemployment is down? The Government?
They cook those numbers more than many sub prime lenders.

exactly, repost from finacialsense.com


And of course, on the statistics, people don?t understand the way government statistics work . And most people will concede that politicians lie. They lie to get elected ? everybody knows that ? they say what they have to say, so I don?t know why people assume that once they get elected they stop lying. I mean that?s all they do. Once you get elected your job is to stay in office. And the way politicians stay in office, is to present a rosy scenario. And so what these guys do is they constantly change the way that economic statistics are calculated so that they can give a better result; so the politicians can point up to these dumbed up statistics as evidence that things have gotten better while they have been in office.

eg.

So they constantly change and redefine how things are measured. So the unemployment rate, for example, today, is calculated far differently than it was in the past; if they calculated unemployment during the Great Depression the way we do it now, they would probably have had very little unemployment then either They calculate GDP differently. There are a lot of things calculated as part of GNP that 5 years ago, 10 years ago, 20 years ago would not have been counted. Everything has changed, so when they compare a number today to one 20 years ago, it?s completely irrelevant comparisons because they?re not doing it the same way.

from shadowstats.com

" Today, the unemployment number does not include those unemployed who have been discouraged and out of work for more than a year. So they are taken out of the work force completely automatically. This results in knocking about 5 million unemployed out of the broader measures of unemployment.

Thus, unemployment is about 50% higher than is commonly alleged. And thus, "Today unemployment is really up around 12%."

The Judge 11-14-2007 06:48 AM

The Chinese

Retributi0n 11-14-2007 07:41 AM

Does anyone know what a convertible bond loan is??

Snake Doctor 11-14-2007 07:48 AM

I don't know, I'm still trying to figure out why the stock market was so bad in 2000.

tony286 11-14-2007 07:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Megafoo (Post 13365617)
the realestate market and its bubble finally popped! It NEVER should have gone that high in the first place. Just like everything in this economy it was basically fixed, first it started to rise because the people that could afford it and had the legitimate credit could afford to pay thier bills. Combine that will low interest rates after the turn of the century everyone was buying up. Then mortgage companies started to get into riskier loans to keep it going, sub prime loads people that either really couldnt afford it..or looked like they could on paper but didnt have the credit for it were given loans normally they shouldnt have been qualified for. Now the market is tapped out, and everyone that shouldn't have gotten loans are starting to default on their payments because of the economy and interest..BOOM instant flood of house back on the market.and everyone that was building houses late in the game only added to the problem.

Just because everyone has jobs doesnt mean everyone has GOOD jobs. most jobs that are being created are low end jobs. Combine that with oil prices and inflation because of that. You have the makings of a bad situation.

Excellent post.

tony286 11-14-2007 07:51 AM

When they talk about easy loans to be had. When I got my condo 3 yrs ago, they gave me a upper rectal and had to jump thru all kinds of hoops to get approved.

BerdoR 11-14-2007 07:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Retributi0n (Post 13370774)
Does anyone know what a convertible bond loan is??

have a read in Wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convertible_bond

ADL Colin 11-14-2007 08:40 AM

The next greater fool couldn't get a loan anymore.

Sosa 11-14-2007 10:54 AM

Today is is a lot harder for someone to get a loan for a house then 2 years ago when anyone seemed to get one. A lot of people agreeing on prices for a house, but financing never coming through.

GregE 11-14-2007 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by teomaxxx (Post 13370593)
from shadowstats.com

" Today, the unemployment number does not include those unemployed who have been discouraged and out of work for more than a year. So they are taken out of the work force completely automatically. This results in knocking about 5 million unemployed out of the broader measures of unemployment.

Thus, unemployment is about 50% higher than is commonly alleged. And thus, "Today unemployment is really up around 12%."

Precisely.

And this in fact would be the most blatant example of government dishonesty of all.

You don't ship good jobs overseas, "replace" them with burger flipping jobs and then expect everything to be okay just because you've cooked the books to say everything is okay.

It's that simple really and everything else is just frosting on the cake.

Rochard 11-14-2007 12:02 PM

One of the things I've never understood about the housing market is why a house goes up in value. If I buy a house and sit on it for twenty years, it's now throughly used, hopelessly out of date, shit like the water heater and AC units are breaking down, and it's just got nicks and marks all over the place.

Forest 11-14-2007 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 13371794)
One of the things I've never understood about the housing market is why a house goes up in value. If I buy a house and sit on it for twenty years, it's now throughly used, hopelessly out of date, shit like the water heater and AC units are breaking down, and it's just got nicks and marks all over the place.

im markets like florida there are several factors to home prices going up.

1. there is no more real land to build houses on.
2. alot of baby boomers and snow birds wanting to buy down here

in places like montana i dont understand it though

DaddyHalbucks 11-14-2007 12:22 PM

Overbuilding could be one cause.

Wages not increasing as real estate prices climbed might be another.

Paul 11-14-2007 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GreyWolf (Post 13365851)
You noticed what the banks and brokerage corps are doing now? Decorating what they describe as "prime investments" and repackaging these CDO's and trying to offload them on to unsuspecting investors. When you look at the composition of these bonds - they contain a high percentage of sub-prime mortgage problems and fat chance of an investor actually gaining by purchasing them.

Typical example are CDO-based hedge funds from Bear Stearns which have been reported to be worthless. There is also a rising conflict of interest with rating agencies who value these CDO's - they same rating agencies are supported financially by the industry selling them. Due dilligence is missing.

Bottom line - financial institutions are trying to offload the problem they created on to unsuspecting investors - yet another time-bomb waiting to blow.

I thought that was the cause of the credit crunch in europe and the UK? Investors and banks purchased a lot of these (bad investments) which resulted in the credit crunch

I think this article explained it well

http://www.thetrumpet.com/index.php?q=4288.2525.0.0

GreyWolf 11-14-2007 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coatsy (Post 13372937)
I thought that was the cause of the credit crunch in europe and the UK? Investors and banks purchased a lot of these (bad investments) which resulted in the credit crunch

The CDO's were created because of the the home problem Coatsy - it's a brokerage house/bank method of unloading their bad debt problem on to the public. The predatory/greed conduct of lenders was the core problem - ie where they gladly dumped mortgages on folks who had little hope of paying mortgages. (Always think that is totally immoral and little better than loansharking. Forgetting the money angle, - it causes severe problems on a personal basis for many people.)

Then, when the foreclosures started - banks were left with (least up till now), around $750 billion of real estate on their balance sheets which is declining in value. So... they pulled in brokers and repackaged that debt in fancy paper and ribbons and the brokers have now been offloading these CDO's to the public.

It kinda makes you wonder what lenders were thinking when they elected to issue funds to people outside the normal lending criteria - and whether there already was a problem ahead for banks. Tho, it's generally thought to be just a predatory plan accompanied by irrational exhuberance.

Sure.. inter-bank lending has left a fair number of non-US financial institutions with debt problems - along with any foreign banks operating within the US. These banks include HSBC and Barclays - if they have not already made a statement of losses, chances are they will shortly. Tho think HSBC has indicated a figure of one $1billion? (They got off light and can stand that loss). It's inevitable a number of banks then purchased the worthless CDO's which were never properly rated - so, yet another hit (or is it a fraud? :winkwink:)

It appears the UK scenario is basically much the same - banks got this weirdo idea of predatory/enthusiastic lending and tapping into the sub-prime market. It's nowhere as bad as the US home lending - but sure to create plenty problems and bad debt - especially in 2008.

Now we all got credit crunches floating about :winkwink: These may have different backgrounds - the UK side is more related to the Central Bank upping interest rates to counter sub-prime lending and this appears to be working OK - so far (noticed there are mumblings that interest rates may actually drop soon). The US side is not so bright in that there is a lowering of interest rates thru necessity - but at least US banks are getting more stringent on loan/mortgage issuing.

Only my :2 cents: - 2008 is going to be a foul year for any western economy and will vary depending on how much of a grip they have on fiscal policy.

PS Hold off on that purchase till the market bottoms out :winkwink::thumbsup

fuzebox 11-14-2007 05:04 PM

My uneducated guess would be because the value or housing costs have skyrocketed at such a ridiculous rate that no one can actually afford to buy a house anymore... I know in Vancouver 70 year old houses in shitty areas are $500k+.

GreyWolf 11-14-2007 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fuzebox (Post 13373249)
My uneducated guess would be because the value or housing costs have skyrocketed at such a ridiculous rate that no one can actually afford to buy a house anymore... I know in Vancouver 70 year old houses in shitty areas are $500k+.

Got to be about right fuzebox.

Can't remember the exact figures for the US right now, but generally they showed an increase of 85% over five years or so. Underlying that - there was no actual valid reason why homes should increase 85% and appears more related to wishful thinking and where the economic background is unlikely to support that level of increase.

Canada is prob much the same, tho the economic background is different in that Canada has a balanced economy it's prob more sustainable.

It's the same with the UK - there is little chance for first-time buyers stepping on to the home ownership ladder. Real estate prices are stupid high (tho expect them to be hit to a degree soon), but the economy is relatively well-balanced.

Were we both are now (Costa Rica) - the levels of real estate appreciation is absurd, (still running at around 50% on the Pacific coast and no signs of any change), but again, that does not rely on the economy or sub-prime and more related to folks from other continents chosing a different lifestyle and relocating.

jaysmoke 11-14-2007 06:15 PM

hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

TheJimmy 11-14-2007 08:57 PM

ARMS and 'stated' bullshit paper that was done...chickens coming home to roost :/ the UPside is there is a big ass "ON SALE" sign on a lot of nice properties now and for the next several months...

GregE 11-14-2007 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheJimmy (Post 13374065)
...the UPside is there is a big ass "ON SALE" sign on a lot of nice properties now and for the next several months...

Months?

Try years.

ADL Colin 11-15-2007 04:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fuzebox (Post 13373249)
My uneducated guess would be because the value or housing costs have skyrocketed at such a ridiculous rate that no one can actually afford to buy a house anymore... I know in Vancouver 70 year old houses in shitty areas are $500k+.

Yeah, as Webby said that is really it. Bubbles tend to burst though occasionally one just grinds around until prices catch up with their long-term expected values. Over the past 100 years housing values have generally increased at about the rate of inflation. This varies greatly with location. Schiller's book on the subject is a great read as it was written during the bubble.

Real estate became the hot area of investment at roughly the same time the stock market was peaking. Money was moving from the markets to real estate. New money was going into real estate and not the stock market. Condo building projects, REITs, flipping houses and so on. It was a pile of cards with people selling one thing to the next person who wanted to sell it to the next person at a higher price and so on. Profits from one project were piled into two more and so on creating massive inventories.

I was in a trendy Fort Lauderdale restaurant in 1999 and around me I heard multiple conversations about the stock market. People who didn't sound like they knew much at all were talking about how much they or their friends were making in the markets. "This guy on CNBC said to buy this stock". There were all kinds of schemes. I knew brokers who were alloted a certain number of shares of IPOs at the pre-market price and they sold them to friends and big accounts.

Then about 2004/2005 or so I was in an Orlando restaurant and the same thing happened but with real estate. I kept meeting people telling me they were "getting their real estate license". I told them they were crazy. Oh, and plenty of friends were suddenly making $200k+/year "doing mortgages". Hell, there were even people on GFY looking for links to their websites selling mortgages.

More recently their has been a huge run-up in commodities. It is difficult to tell if this is truly a speculative bubble or how much is fundamentals as China's demand is soaring. You don't and maybe won't hear people in a restaurant talking about their latest commodity gains. Though you might hear some bitching about gas prices. I sold my mining stocks a few months ago though but have kept some energy stocks.

These were all great opportunities for those who recognized the situation early. If you got in the stock market in 1995 you made a killing. If you bought tech stocks (specifically most of NASDAQ) in late 1999 you got killed. If you bought real estate in 1996 you did great. If you bought in 2006 you are hurting. Same with commodities. Timing changing depending on the commodity.

Today's finance community is making it easier than ever to make profits from whatever the hottest area is. You just can't jump in once the warning signs are out. The warning signs being "everyone is getting rich", the cover of Time Magazine showing instand new $10M+ millionaires, claims of a "new economy" and "this time it's different" and statements like "Real estate ALWAYS goes up".

ADL Colin 11-15-2007 04:03 AM

Here is an interesting and possibly enlightening conversation on the subject from 2005 at the peak.

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...al+estate+lars

wyldworx 11-15-2007 06:08 AM

due to the change in economic ethics now common to the marketplace... "i will fetch you this much" became a famous catch phrase, trends luring new homebuyers to purchase now pay later went hand in hand with the excitement first timers experienced which could easily be substituted to fear of a closing window kind of statement by the right asshole, inflating an allready exagerated value to the point of collapse. Thank the leaders of the free world, they just send the bombs at time of payment anyway rendering the opposition to dual or be pussy whipped with a coward status in history. The chinese are trained with screwdrivers, the americans are too busy fucking themselves and the brits happy everyone doesn't mind them wearing mums skirts anymore. If i were a betting man, then my money is on india - have you heard how angry those fuckers get when you insist on them leaving you alone from spam calls.... they are one angry bunch of cowbowers.

Paul 11-19-2007 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GreyWolf (Post 13373236)
Sure.. inter-bank lending has left a fair number of non-US financial institutions with debt problems - along with any foreign banks operating within the US. These banks include HSBC and Barclays - if they have not already made a statement of losses, chances are they will shortly. Tho think HSBC has indicated a figure of one $1billion? (They got off light and can stand that loss). It's inevitable a number of banks then purchased the worthless CDO's which were never properly rated - so, yet another hit (or is it a fraud? :winkwink:)

I don't understand why any foreign investors would want to invest in America after this huge con. You can't fuck the very people you rely on for investment and expect foreign investment to continue.

I think the US could collapse within 5 years, maybe sooner! Things are unravelling at an alarming rate at the moment!

Quote:

Originally Posted by GreyWolf (Post 13373236)
Only my :2 cents: - 2008 is going to be a foul year for any western economy and will vary depending on how much of a grip they have on fiscal policy.

Totally agree, I'm already starting to trade my sterling for euros, canadian dollars and gold (Don't know enought about asian currencies at the moment but have heard they are a good bet long term)

The pound is going to tank in 2008, once the housing market crashes the £ is going down with it!

Quote:

Originally Posted by GreyWolf (Post 13373236)
PS Hold off on that purchase till the market bottoms out :winkwink::thumbsup

Seriously, you could not pay me money to buy a place at the moment :pimp

The Northern Ireland market is going to crash hard and fast, some sites online are reporting 10 - 15% falls in house prices already (Not officially obviously :winkwink:)

Prices need to fall by 40 - 50%

Average NI house price = £250,000
Average NI wage = £20,000

Quote:

Originally Posted by GreyWolf (Post 13373325)
Got to be about right fuzebox. It's the same with the UK - there is little chance for first-time buyers stepping on to the home ownership ladder. Real estate prices are stupid high (tho expect them to be hit to a degree soon), but the economy is relatively well-balanced.

Actually it's very likely that the UK will be hit harder because prices are a lot more unaffordable versus average UK wages

The average UK house price is around £200,000

The average UK wage is around £22,000


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123