GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   USA = Financial Titanic? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=782567)

xmas13 11-06-2007 03:06 PM

USA = Financial Titanic?
 
In the early 20th Century, every Briton thought the Titanic was so large and invincible.

But bad management and an iceberg destroyed it.

*** Bush Administration+ Financial Iceberg= Catastrophe. ***

http://www.solarnavigator.net/images...g_atlantic.jpg

Vick! 11-06-2007 03:34 PM

I am worried.

papill0n 11-06-2007 03:35 PM

ok its getting boring now

madfuck 11-06-2007 03:38 PM

that was the worst day for lots of ppl
how sad "(

BOSS1 11-06-2007 03:45 PM

hmmm increasing exports to supersize the economy, does not equal titanic... its more like a submarine

After Shock Media 11-06-2007 03:47 PM

Umm titanic had defective parts and they scrapped lifeboats. Ah just nitpicking.

So who today is the dude who jumped off early on drunk as hell and survived?

axelez 11-06-2007 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media (Post 13340206)
So who today is the dude who jumped off early on drunk as hell and survived?

BUSH .......

KingK7 11-06-2007 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by madfuck (Post 13340156)
that was the worst day for lots of ppl
how sad "(

Yes, very insightful

woj 11-06-2007 04:07 PM

if it does goes down it will drag the whole world with it... doesn't matter if you are from canada or europe or china or if you invest in gold or real estate or art or whatever else people invest in, if the titanic goes down, the whole world economy will sink with it...

Snake Doctor 11-06-2007 04:08 PM

Yes of course.
Because European porn webmasters aren't getting as many euros for their dollars anymore, it means the entire US economy is on the verge of collapse.

</sarcasm>

EZRhino 11-06-2007 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snake Doctor (Post 13340313)
Yes of course.
Because European porn webmasters aren't getting as many euros for their dollars anymore, it means the entire US economy is on the verge of collapse.

</sarcasm>

Well said

Brad Mitchell 11-06-2007 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snake Doctor (Post 13340313)
Yes of course.
Because European porn webmasters aren't getting as many euros for their dollars anymore, it means the entire US economy is on the verge of collapse.

</sarcasm>

When you put it like that, it does make me feel a little bit better.

Brad

Validus 11-06-2007 06:02 PM

On the weekend I watched a documentary about central banks and the Federal Reserve. I didn’t know it was a private corporation. Shows you how much I know though. I am sure its no new to must here.

yahoo-xxx-girls.com 11-06-2007 06:05 PM

Bump ...

GreyWolf 11-06-2007 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brad Mitchell (Post 13340887)
When you put it like that, it does make me feel a little bit better.

Brad

Agree - there is nothing like hiding the foreclosure notice under the carpet :winkwink:

Sure foreign webmasters may be moaning now (along with many investors who pulled from US dollar markets), but, it's nothing in comparison to the effects of a weak dollar on the US economy. By the year end the cost of higher imports, oil etc will have increased from a trickle to a flow - not good news for anyone.

V_RocKs 11-06-2007 06:44 PM

Not too worried...

In reality it would really fuck up the rest of the world if we went down. The rest of the world would be fucked without the exports we do have and would be doubly fucked if we suddenly stopped buying what they were selling.

Barefootsies 11-06-2007 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj (Post 13340306)
if it does goes down it will drag the whole world with it... doesn't matter if you are from canada or europe or china or if you invest in gold or real estate or art or whatever else people invest in, if the titanic goes down, the whole world economy will sink with it...

Correct...

xmas13 11-06-2007 07:01 PM

WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON? :mad:

PetroChina's Value Tops $1 Trillion, Surpassing Exxon
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...CuA&refer=asia

50% of the world's largest companies are Chinese.

Quote:

The other Chinese companies that rank among the world's 10 largest by market value are China Petroleum, known as Sinopec, China Mobile Ltd., Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd. and China Construction Bank Corp.
Quote:

The oil producer's Shanghai listing pushes China's stock market beyond the U.K. as the world's third-largest.
http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/11/...llionaires.php

China's economy generates billionaires by the dozen

Quote:

The United States has more billionaires than any other country: 415 by Forbes's last count.

No. 2, and closing fast? China.

A year ago, there were 15 billionaires in China. Now, there are more than 100, according to the widely watched Hurun survey, and 66, according to Forbes.

Unlike America's rich, China's are hardly famous, even in China. Gates, Buffett and Brin are known around the world. But Yang, Guo and Zhang?
http://liverpoolchamber.files.wordpr...china-flag.jpg

xmas13 11-06-2007 07:02 PM

Yang, Guo and Zhang???????????

WTF!

xmas13 11-06-2007 07:03 PM

http://img.iht.com/images/2007/11/06...onaires550.jpg

thonglife 11-06-2007 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xmas13 (Post 13341143)
WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON? :mad:

PetroChina's Value Tops $1 Trillion, Surpassing Exxon
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...CuA&refer=asia

50% of the world's largest companies are Chinese.





http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/11/...llionaires.php

China's economy generates billionaires by the dozen



http://liverpoolchamber.files.wordpr...china-flag.jpg

Move to China.

xmas13 11-06-2007 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thonglife (Post 13341161)
Move to China.

NO WAY. :Oh crap

EonBlue 11-06-2007 09:11 PM

Or what if none of the economic fear-mongering is true?

http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArti...78895915214665

Quote:

Friday's employment report, showing a much-higher-than-expected increase of 166,000 in nonfarm payroll jobs, was only the latest in a spate of remarkable reports showing the economy's stunning resilience.

Earlier this week, we discovered that, contrary to fears and forecasts of much slower growth in the third quarter, the U.S. economy in fact expanded at a 3.9% rate ? even in the midst of a vicious housing downturn, soaring mortgage delinquencies and a credit crunch.

Inflation showed its lowest annual rise since the 1960s, despite oil touching $96 a barrel. Employment costs, rising in the third quarter at 3.8% annual rate, are well under control. The broad stock market, despite an up and down year, has mostly been up ? punching repeatedly through its previous highs.

Just three weeks ago, the Office of Management and Budget reported that the budget deficit fell to $163 billion, or 1.2% of GDP, its lowest level in five years. Meanwhile, even the big, bad trade deficit has begun shrinking, as the weak dollar sets off a U.S. export boom.

$5 submissions 11-06-2007 10:32 PM

How much is the IRAQ WAR costing the US?

coolegg2 11-06-2007 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by $5 submissions (Post 13341809)
How much is the IRAQ WAR costing the US?

http://www.nationalpriorities.org/Co...-of-War-3.html

GreyWolf 11-06-2007 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EonBlue (Post 13341576)
Or what if none of the economic fear-mongering is true?

It is correct that productivity was up for the last quarter - oldish news now and over-ridden by other problems in that quarter. 3.9&#37; was actually very good and better than the forecast of 3.8%. It's a pity this can't be sustained thru the year - else there would be a chance of seeing something more positive over time.

Unfortuately this current quarter is expected to be fairly bad, mainly due to the economic situation gathering momentum, but, you never know - it is possible a decent percentage could be there, despite the background problems.

Other good news appears on a Fed survey of banks - they are generally tightening up on the issue of loans and remortgaging, obviously to cover their own asses, but it does keep the "quality" of loans higher and less chance of defaulting.

Any figures on employment are meaningless unless they can support them and give foundation for the calculation. This is the same mob who claimed something like an employment again of around 426,000 at the end of last year - and this was then revised to 19,000'ish. They are prone to hype and fantasy and trying to convince people it's the truth.

Bad news is the home problem is not showing any signs of bettering. Just read forecasts earlier of financial institutions being loaded with $1 trillion of sub-prime mortgage problems in next year or so. That's one hell of a lot of homes banks will have on their hands which they don't want. There may be a clue in banks being more flexible with customers on mortgage terms where a customer has a chance of repaying - it sure is better than homes standing empty and people without decent shelter.

So far about 1.7 million people have had foreclosure proceedings and an expected further 2 million over the next few years. According to the Joint Economic Committee, one in five mortages are now in jeopardy, tho these are usually related to sub-prime.

Believe me - it's not fear mongering - it's real life for many unfortunately and that can be painful. Needless to say the dollar dropped again and oil is on a fresh high of $97ish. Got little doubts oil will reach $100 now and the dollar will keep sliding each month until there is light at the end of the tunnel - tho, you'd need a magnifying glass to spot that speck of light - bad news.

Snake Doctor 11-06-2007 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EonBlue (Post 13341576)
Or what if none of the economic fear-mongering is true?

http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArti...78895915214665

Friday's employment report, showing a much-higher-than-expected increase of 166,000 in nonfarm payroll jobs, was only the latest in a spate of remarkable reports showing the economy's stunning resilience.

Earlier this week, we discovered that, contrary to fears and forecasts of much slower growth in the third quarter, the U.S. economy in fact expanded at a 3.9% rate ? even in the midst of a vicious housing downturn, soaring mortgage delinquencies and a credit crunch.

Inflation showed its lowest annual rise since the 1960s, despite oil touching $96 a barrel. Employment costs, rising in the third quarter at 3.8% annual rate, are well under control. The broad stock market, despite an up and down year, has mostly been up ? punching repeatedly through its previous highs.

Just three weeks ago, the Office of Management and Budget reported that the budget deficit fell to $163 billion, or 1.2% of GDP, its lowest level in five years. Meanwhile, even the big, bad trade deficit has begun shrinking, as the weak dollar sets off a U.S. export boom.

These are the kinds of things I've been pointing out for months here, but every time I do the euro brigade comes in and tells me that I'm looking at the wrong numbers, or that the government falsifies the numbers, or that the government hides the true data, or that they have a line graph that corresponds to a pie chart that ties into a Nostradomus prediction that the US economy is going to collapse and by this time next year we'll all be begging the chinese for lead based paint to feed to our kids.

yahoo-xxx-girls.com 11-06-2007 10:57 PM

XE.com is reporting 1 USD = 0.90905 CND !

GreyWolf 11-06-2007 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Balalsubturfyooj (Post 13341882)
XE.com is reporting 1 USD = 0.90905 CND !

And that is the acid test :thumbsup The day the dollar starts gaining value is the day there may be some hope a recovery is on it's way. Until then - there is no confidence and until there is confidence, not only within the US public, but elsewhere - stats are meaningless and something to hide under the carpet.

Kevsh 11-06-2007 11:36 PM

$7000 per household = The cost of the war in Iraq.
But yet does any Americans here feel they've given up that much to the government this year? No? Hmm, wonder where all that money's coming from ...

Hint: If you have kids or are planning on it, you better start an investment fund soon - they are going to be footing quite the bar tab by the time they hit adulthood.

RawAlex 11-07-2007 12:10 AM

The only good news in all of this? American porn is now stunningly cheap for everyone else in the world. 6 or 7 years ago, American porn was fucking expensive, costing upwards to 50 euros for a membership. Now, your $29.95 price converts to about 20 euros and still dropping. It makes selling porn memberships priced in American dollars a little easier (but not as profitable for those of us outside the US).

yahoo-xxx-girls.com 11-07-2007 12:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RawAlex (Post 13342058)
The only good news in all of this? American porn is now stunningly cheap for everyone else in the world. 6 or 7 years ago, American porn was fucking expensive, costing upwards to 50 euros for a membership. Now, your $29.95 price converts to about 20 euros and still dropping. It makes selling porn memberships priced in American dollars a little easier (but not as profitable for those of us outside the US).

:thumbsup

teomaxxx 11-07-2007 02:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snake Doctor (Post 13341875)
These are the kinds of things I've been pointing out for months here, but every time I do the euro brigade comes in and tells me that I'm looking at the wrong numbers, or that the government falsifies the numbers, or that the government hides the true data, or that they have a line graph that corresponds to a pie chart that ties into a Nostradomus prediction that the US economy is going to collapse and by this time next year we'll all be begging the chinese for lead based paint to feed to our kids.

yes, they constantly changed the way how the stats are counted and thats a proof.
eg. latest job report:

"The U.S. October employment report came better than expected. But the details of this report are much weaker than the headline figure of 166K non-farm jobs created in October.

First, the establishment survey says that 166K jobs were created in October. But the household survey says that 250K jobs were lost in October. Which survey is more correct? In years when the economy was growing rapidly (2004 to mid 2006) the household survey was showing faster growth than the establishment survey. Indeed at that time supply-side commentators used to write every other month (in the op-ed page of the WSJ and other media outlets) that the household survey was a much better measure of the employment situation as the establishment survey did not fully reflect self-employment and new smaller businesses. But whether one survey or the other is a better proxy of the true state of the labor market depends on when you are in the business cycle. When the economy is growing fast ? as in 2004-2006 - the household survey may overestimate job creation; when the economy is slowing down ? like now - the establishment survey may overestimate job creation and the household survey may be a better measure. So today the household survey tells us that 250K jobs were lost in October."

from:
http://www.rgemonitor.com/blog/roubini/

sumphatpimp 11-07-2007 02:43 AM

don't worry, the Democrats are coming, they are going to fix it.

GreyWolf 11-07-2007 03:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GreyWolf (Post 13341829)
Needless to say the dollar dropped again and oil is on a fresh high of $97ish. Got little doubts oil will reach $100 now and the dollar will keep sliding each month .....

Mmmm.. spoke too soon! Oil is now up to over $98 at the moment - and 100% certainty it will reach $100 shortly.

GreyWolf 11-07-2007 04:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jesus H Christ (Post 13342497)
Oh no not Webby's version of America is crashing..because of oil prices.

http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/en...asoline-prices

I have news for you ...American gas prices are cheap compared to the rest of the world. Also, a large majority of the lenders for US home mortgages were NOT American.

More flagface bs - and a load of irrelevant crap :1orglaugh

Don't worry about the rest of the world on oil - they have a balanced economy and buying oil from a stronger currency. What has the retail price of gas got to do with oil markets at $98/barrel??? Some countries actually tax gas and get revenues - try it sometime - along with the balanced economy!

And - no, "the majority" of the US home mortgage lenders are American, - you think they were Icelandic? But, dream on :thumbsup

GreyWolf 11-07-2007 04:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jesus H Christ (Post 13342537)
Webby.. whatever you have to tell yourself to get through the day.. I bet deep down inside you want to be an American. :2 cents:

More proof you are a total flagface retard with nothing to offer - other than pretend black is white??? It's a common habit with flagfaces - they all ooze hatred and whine about "American haters", but still remain clueless - ironic and sad.

Sure... it's always been a dream to be an "American" and live near retards like you :1orglaugh

GreyWolf 11-07-2007 04:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jesus H Christ (Post 13342554)
Webby. you're the only one oozing hatred for Americans. Just think..what another month and you'll have a new nic because of your brilliance?

Feeling insecure that you need to keep trying to defend something flagface - why is that??? :1orglaugh

I despise total trash who cannot even get their heads around basic facts and try to deny their existance then construct fantasies in an effort to defend something - it's common with the brain dead and the dumbed down species.

All these "facts" you just spewed out as a defence - not one of them is true. The typical charicature of the Dumb American - totally ignorant. Sheesh you are impressive :1orglaugh Ever thought of becoming an economist?? *lol*

Don't get your frilly panties in a flagface twist over nicks or my brillance :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

GreyWolf 11-07-2007 04:53 AM

Fine - so you decided not to ooze your hatred of others now, have you?? :1orglaugh

BTW - Oil is still at $98 - pity that upset you :1orglaugh



PS I'll let you know when it reaches $100 and you can spew more crap

GreyWolf 11-07-2007 04:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jesus H Christ (Post 13342589)
please the reason I posted had nothing to do with oil prices. Tool. got to go.

Of course it didn't - you just needed to play the keyboard warrior and defend - I understand the disease only too well :1orglaugh:thumbsup

DamageX 11-07-2007 05:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thonglife (Post 13341161)
Move to China.

No need to, China will move to you instead. Start taking Chinese lessons.

RegUser 11-07-2007 06:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DamageX (Post 13342608)
No need to, China will move to you instead. Start taking Chinese lessons.

i agree
by the time this forthcoming recession is over, there will major changes in the world

scottybuzz 11-07-2007 06:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj (Post 13340306)
if it does goes down it will drag the whole world with it... doesn't matter if you are from canada or europe or china or if you invest in gold or real estate or art or whatever else people invest in, if the titanic goes down, the whole world economy will sink with it...

simple but crucial point :thumbsup

ffmihai 11-07-2007 06:12 AM

when are the next elections in USA?

Snake Doctor 11-07-2007 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by teomaxxx (Post 13342312)
yes, they constantly changed the way how the stats are counted and thats a proof.
eg. latest job report:

"The U.S. October employment report came better than expected. But the details of this report are much weaker than the headline figure of 166K non-farm jobs created in October.

First, the establishment survey says that 166K jobs were created in October. But the household survey says that 250K jobs were lost in October. Which survey is more correct? In years when the economy was growing rapidly (2004 to mid 2006) the household survey was showing faster growth than the establishment survey. Indeed at that time supply-side commentators used to write every other month (in the op-ed page of the WSJ and other media outlets) that the household survey was a much better measure of the employment situation as the establishment survey did not fully reflect self-employment and new smaller businesses. But whether one survey or the other is a better proxy of the true state of the labor market depends on when you are in the business cycle. When the economy is growing fast ? as in 2004-2006 - the household survey may overestimate job creation; when the economy is slowing down ? like now - the establishment survey may overestimate job creation and the household survey may be a better measure. So today the household survey tells us that 250K jobs were lost in October."

from:
http://www.rgemonitor.com/blog/roubini/

Ok now you're on ignore along with Grey Wolf.

You're like a fucking broken record.

You're right dude, everyone in the US is broke and unemployed. None of us really have jobs the government just makes up reports saying that we do so they can borrow money from foreign countries.

GreyWolf 11-07-2007 04:25 PM

teomaxxx:

Congrats man :winkwink: Would it be nice if the other few trolls put us on ignore as well? At least threads might not be clogged up with stupid nonsense and irrelevant flagface bs :thumbsup

Shakula 11-07-2007 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj (Post 13340306)
if it does goes down it will drag the whole world with it... doesn't matter if you are from canada or europe or china or if you invest in gold or real estate or art or whatever else people invest in, if the titanic goes down, the whole world economy will sink with it...

Not correct. Not to long ago, the UK was the financial economy on this planet.
Then the US took over with time and now it seems to move to China.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123