Major Legal Breakthrough!
 

http://www.abcnews.go.com/wire/US/ap20020919_2463.html

These politicians are PIGGGGGGGGS, but thats good for porn

What shocks me is that this ruling was unanimous! How could everyone decide that videotaping/photographing upskirt shots does not violate privacy? I'm sorry, but this seems a little wrong.

I'm all for upskirts (really, I like it!), but when you do it without consent, that's just wrong.

WG

i agree with wiredguy

i agree with Beemk

dont they have any type of shoe cameras or something? no wonder the guy got caught.

all BS aside its good news that things are getting better legally

While I kinda disagree with this particular law, this is true, it does seem that from a legal perspective that prosecutors are starting to lay off pornographers. But I still think consent is needed in this voyeurism case.

Especially since this article references little girls? Upskirts of girls without consent is bad, but upskirts of little girls (18 or under) and without consent, I kinda draw the line there.

WG

anything under 18 is bad and nasty, but over age i think all should be legal

Even without consent? Think about it from a girl's point of view, how would you feel if there was basically camera's everywhere you go specifically trying to get upskirt shots of girls? If you go to say amusement parks, dance club, even the washroom.

I still think consent is definitely needed.

WG

WG your right but for porn its good for women maybe not

so, you have these amazing super powers to distinguish a girl/womn's age just by glancing at her knickers in a fuzzy, poorly lit picture??? you sir are a god!

what if you were browsing a tgp site and went to an upskirt gallery and saw upskirt shots of your wife/girlfriend/daughter, etc in the gallery and there was nothing you could do even though they didnt want their pictures up there and didnt give permission. would you think thats fair?

That pude wacker judge keeps running his mouth and he'll kill that niche quick!!!!!!!!!!!! J.O. only the forbidden sells. Tell people its ok and it won't sell. Believe me i do know that for sure.



Oh for a man like Bill Clinton ........... all he did was sit in his office and get BJ's from some fat chick. Now that was a public servant !


Minded his own damn business and let the country run itself.

What was done was not specifically prohibited by the law, so the correct judgment is acquittal. This seems to mean the system is working.

It's still a non-issue as relates directly to upskirt content, because he doesn't end up with 2257 documentation for the footage/pics, and therefore will have trouble selling it. So existing law does sort of protect the victims even in this case.

Even the pervs who are just shooting the content for themselves? What about pedophiles who go around shooting young girl upskirts and just beating off to it. So he's not selling it, so he won't need 2257 docs, but it's still illegal.

So it prevents mass-distribution which is a good thing, but it doesn't prevent the problem in my opinion. Pedophiles know where to go to share their pics/videos in the underground to avoid police, and so this stuff may get distributed on not such a large scale but still does go around.

WG

peds should be hung by their balls

Not really a shot in the arm for porn.. they're gonna ammend the law to "close the loophole"

Ohio uses a bunch of smaller charges on upskirt camera guys and that rule of watch your step sir, Oops... Watch your head sir, THUNK, Oops.

If it gets to trial they usually get 6 - 18 mos. Guess thats better than if a boyfriend or hubby gets them first. :1orglaugh

Apparently it's not illegal yet, although I agree it should be. The lady lobbying for a new law to make it illegal will probably accomplish what we want.

untill then voyer away, im buying a bunch of x10's lol what a joke

Wow, unanimous! I agree with you, WiredGuy... doing it without consent is wrong...

heh, that's what consent is about, buddy. if you have consent, you have a signature, on a model contract (which they can only sign themselves if they're 18+). so it's all legit.

psst, re-read the post I was repsonding too....he was claiming that he felt it was ok to videotape an upskirt of someone over 18, just that it was "wrong" if they were udnerage....how does one judge the age of the person when looking up their skirt? these women were being videotaped without their consent....