GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Playboy latching onto Adult.com (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=77966)

Bobo 09-18-2002 09:45 PM

Playboy latching onto Adult.com
 
Pretty lame methinks. Everybody knows Playboy is a defunct online enterprise. Pathetic member signup numbers and retention. Now they're using Adult.com as a vehicle to push there unwanted product.

Nice going fucking up daddy's legendary business Mrs Hefner jr.

On that note bigger and better collaberation will be announced in the upcoming weeks: Adult.com & BoboCash

Sly_RJ 09-18-2002 09:48 PM

I'm assuming they'll be changing things to become a better package?

Bobo 09-18-2002 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sly_RJ
I'm assuming they'll be changing things to become a better package?
For the Playboy political commentary section I hope, lol.

BrettJ 09-18-2002 09:50 PM

me thinks it rocks.

playboy needs somebody that understands the web to revamp them.

congrats Lens and Team - I'd love to hear the story sometime of how the deal came about - but til then - congrats and thanks for forging ahead - and cutting a path for those of us that still consider the web a legitimate place to earn a living =)

~brett

Bobo 09-18-2002 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BrettJ
me thinks it rocks.

playboy needs somebody that understands the web to revamp them.

congrats Lens and Team - I'd love to hear the story sometime of how the deal came about - but til then - congrats and thanks for forging ahead - and cutting a path for those of us that still consider the web a legitimate place to earn a living =)

~brett

Should I provide the pooper scooper or do you already have one? I've heard Lens suffers from anal incontinence so watch your nose and face.

chodadog 09-18-2002 09:53 PM

I agree with BrettJ. Playboy could have had a huge hold of things on the web if they knew what they were doing. Adult.com obviously know what they're doing. Combine the branding of Playboy and the expertise of adult.com and you've got a winning combination in my opinion.

*cough*Lensman, where's my bonus?*cough*

Sly_RJ 09-18-2002 09:54 PM

I don't understand your problem. To me, it looks like they're making steps towards creating a better online presence. What's your deal?

FATPad 09-18-2002 09:56 PM

Playboy would be much smarter to just ignore the web. All the big, smart companies are doing that.

Smegma 09-18-2002 09:56 PM

You are underestimating the playboy brand.

payrollpete 09-18-2002 09:57 PM

"Playboy would be much smarter to just ignore the web. All the big, smart companies are doing that"

he is quite right.

although, i think lensman is in the deal just for the chix / parties :)

quiet 09-18-2002 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by FATPad
Playboy would be much smarter to just ignore the web. All the big, smart companies are doing that.
hustler is doing okay online.

BrettJ 09-18-2002 09:58 PM

at least i know who's ass to kiss.

and it doesn't change that it's brilliant fuck'n move for both parties... as chodadog points out - Playboy has an amazing brand name - if people want porn online and don't know where to go - that's going to be one of the first things they type in.

playboy hasn't taken advantage of that.

a nother thing - with all those newbies typing in playboy just to find porn - playboy.com was in a unique position to pop these fumbling surfers out to a ton of other niches - serving as a porn gateway - (mostly in the adult.com empire) but that's a helluva thing to get to leverage =)

FATPad 09-18-2002 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by quiet


hustler is doing okay online.

IGNORE THE WEB!

Bobo 09-18-2002 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by payrollpete
[Balthough, i think lensman is in the deal just for the chix / parties :) [/B]
Agreed......agreed:1orglaugh

hottshot 09-18-2002 10:00 PM

With Playboys trade name and Lensmens marketing genius's it's a win win situation for all parties :2 cents:

Bobo 09-18-2002 10:01 PM

Hustler, Playboy, whatever...all of them amount to scrap compared to what's online. Their time is over. Kick out the old bring in the new. G-bye

Bobo 09-18-2002 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by hottshot
With Playboys trade name and Lensmens marketing genius's it's a win win situation for all parties :2 cents:
WTF? What's next, Playgirl? :1orglaugh

FATPad 09-18-2002 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bobo
Hustler, Playboy, whatever...all of them amount to scrap compared to what's online. Their time is over. Kick out the old bring in the new. G-bye
U R VERRY SMRT.

Bobo 09-18-2002 10:05 PM

Any mainstream articles written about those sites will support what I say.

FATPad 09-18-2002 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bobo
Any mainstream articles written about those sites will support what I say.
All you've said is that the current Playboy site sucks. It probably does. I'm assuming that Adult.com will be making changes to the Playboy site and that there was more to this partnering than just two bored companies who felt like announcing a partnership between them with no plans to change anything anywhere.

If you can't see the potential in the Playboy namebrand alone, you really should find something else to do.

FATPad 09-18-2002 10:09 PM

Oops. I mean: IGNORE THE WEB!

Bobo 09-18-2002 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by FATPad

All you've said is that the current Playboy site sucks. It probably does. I'm assuming that Adult.com will be making changes to the Playboy site and that there was more to this partnering than just two bored companies who felt like announcing a partnership between them with no plans to change anything anywhere.

If you can't see the potential in the Playboy namebrand alone, you really should find something else to do.

You're right. I can't see it. Maybe I'm a jealous bitter person or maybe the brand isn't what it use to be and can never be, again.

chodadog 09-18-2002 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bobo


You're right. I can't see it. Maybe I'm a jealous bitter person or maybe the brand isn't what it use to be and can never be, again.

Don't be so hard on yourself. You're just stupid, that's all.

Bobo 09-18-2002 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by chodadog


Don't be so hard on yourself. You're just stupid, that's all.

I've been through this with you before....say something comprehensible!

chodadog 09-18-2002 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bobo


I've been through this with you before....say something comprehensible!

.. I did.

Bobo 09-18-2002 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by chodadog


.. I did.

Now go wax your ear-holes.

Amputate Your Head 09-18-2002 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bobo
Pretty lame methinks. Everybody knows Playboy is a defunct online enterprise. Pathetic member signup numbers and retention. Now they're using Adult.com as a vehicle to push there unwanted product.
Playboy as a whole is not defunct.... in fact, they kick ass. And who better to get into bed with than one of the best in online adult?

I think it's a pretty sweet deal personally.

Sounds like you're bitter.

chodadog 09-18-2002 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bobo


Now go wax your ear-holes.

You're a strange man.

Bobo 09-18-2002 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Amputate Your Head

Playboy as a whole is not defunct.... in fact, they kick ass. And who better to get into bed with than one of the best in online adult?

I think it's a pretty sweet deal personally.

Sounds like you're bitter.

Truthfully, I would love to attend a Hefner party, who wouldn't?

But if you're looking to the future, it's not a good idea. You don't need vision to see that.

You think the young porn subscriber of today gives a second look at something that reads Playboy? No, he thinks it's a gay mag.

The only people remotely interested in Playboy are the currently pathetic middle-aged loners....in other words a dying breed.

Bobo 09-18-2002 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by chodadog


You're a strange man.

Is that supposed to be an insult?

Bobo 09-18-2002 10:27 PM

....whomever said Playboy is not defunct is dead wrong. Do your research...

quiet 09-18-2002 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bobo
Hustler, Playboy, whatever
uh, hustler is doing better than ever. simple fact.

theking 09-18-2002 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by quiet


uh, hustler is doing better than ever. simple fact.

Wasn't Penthouse on its last legs recently. Has it survived?

TheFLY 09-18-2002 10:33 PM

The Playboy brand has been wasted...

Think of the possibilities -- cams all over the Playboy Masion...

PlayboyMansionCam.com
PlayboyMansionPoolCam.com
PlayboyTryouts.com
PlayboyRejects.com
PlayboyMansionDungeon.com
PlayboyBunnyFacials.com
PlayboyParty.com
PlayboyBunnyTailAnalVirgins.com

Ok well Playboy will probably never agree to use their name for hardcore... or will they?

Bobo 09-18-2002 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking


Wasn't Penthouse on its last legs recently. Has it survived?

Gone...

Bobo 09-18-2002 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by TheFLY
The Playboy brand has been wasted...

Think of the possibilities -- cams all over the Playboy Masion...

PlayboyMansionCam.com
PlayboyMansionPoolCam.com
PlayboyTryouts.com
PlayboyRejects.com
PlayboyMansionDungeon.com
PlayboyBunnyFacials.com
PlayboyParty.com
PlayboyBunnyTailAnalVirgins.com

Ok well Playboy will probably never agree to use their name for hardcore... or will they?

When you're not making dollars you gotta try just about everything.

quiet 09-18-2002 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking


Wasn't Penthouse on its last legs recently. Has it survived?

toast. what does that have to do with hustler?

Quote:

According to Flynt, Hustler's enterprise -a conglomerate of movies, strip clubs, sex shops, and the Internet - is worth over $400 million
from frontline (pbs).

Bobo 09-18-2002 10:37 PM

Flynt is doing a lot more than mags and satellite porn now isn't he, perhaps that's why he's been successful....Playboy hasn't.

Pornwolf 09-18-2002 10:44 PM

Hopefully Lens is successful with this affilliate task. I'm sure if he does as well as I think he will they will give him the reigns to do everything mentioned above.

I think Playboy's online arm has the ability to generate more revenue than the publishing unit.

Right now they need it too, Maxim, FHM, Stuff & Details have lowered newstand circulation dramatically. Playboy just brought in a new editor which is the same guy who's been running Maxim to breathe a little life into the zine. I don't think they realize that the people who are looking for porn are no longer looking for it in a magazine and bush shots don't do it for anyone under 45. Unless the new editor does some INCREDIBLE covers and gimmicks no one will care about the mag in 5 years, especially if Hef passes (heaven forbid). Online & TV domination is the only real way of passing the torch.

Good luck Lens, this could be really big for you.

theking 09-18-2002 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Pornwolf
Hopefully Lens is successful with this affilliate task. I'm sure if he does as well as I think he will they will give him the reigns to do everything mentioned above.

I think Playboy's online arm has the ability to generate more revenue than the publishing unit.

Right now they need it too, Maxim, FHM, Stuff & Details have lowered newstand circulation dramatically. Playboy just brought in a new editor which is the same guy who's been running Maxim to breathe a little life into the zine. I don't think they realize that the people who are looking for porn are no longer looking for it in a magazine and bush shots don't do it for anyone under 45. Unless the new editor does some INCREDIBLE covers and gimmicks no one will care about the mag in 5 years, especially if Hef passes (heaven forbid). Online & TV domination is the only real way of passing the torch.

Good luck Lens, this could be really big for you.

Do people look for porn in Playboy? The pictures are pleasing to the eye, but the magazine itself, without the pics, I think, is a great mag.

Bobo 09-18-2002 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Pornwolf
Hopefully Lens is successful with this affilliate task. I'm sure if he does as well as I think he will they will give him the reigns to do everything mentioned above.

I think Playboy's online arm has the ability to generate more revenue than the publishing unit.

Right now they need it too, Maxim, FHM, Stuff & Details have lowered newstand circulation dramatically. Playboy just brought in a new editor which is the same guy who's been running Maxim to breathe a little life into the zine. I don't think they realize that the people who are looking for porn are no longer looking for it in a magazine and bush shots don't do it for anyone under 45. Unless the new editor does some INCREDIBLE covers and gimmicks no one will care about the mag in 5 years, especially if Hef passes (heaven forbid). Online & TV domination is the only real way of passing the torch.

Good luck Lens, this could be really big for you.

Now you're being sensible. Good post.

Oh yeah, and for Chodalicker...don't take my opinions or constructive critiscm the wrong way. We can all learn something from a discussion like this.

I'm not downplaying Lens...I wish him the best in the new venture...It's definitely a new horizon.

I'm merely offering some opposing views to the 'Lens your the best let me suck your cock congratulations' all the conventional boot lickers on here post.

Some words of advice for you. Try not to be so typical, it's boring.

Pornwolf 09-18-2002 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking


Do people look for porn in Playboy? The pictures are pleasing to the eye, but the magazine itself, without the pics, I think, is a great mag.

Definitely, but it's subscriber base is dropping steadily. Playboy hasn't effectively bridged the gap. It's having the same problem Esquire is having.

Bobo 09-18-2002 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Pornwolf
Definitely, but it's subscriber base is dropping steadily. Playboy hasn't effectively bridged the gap. It's having the same problem Esquire is having.
...and GQ. Who the fuck is going to read that lame 'Men's Magazine' when you've got FMH and the like.

I believe Maxims the largest right now. circulation something like 2 million.

Amputate Your Head 09-18-2002 10:55 PM

it is... Maxim is on top of the heap right now.

Mr.Fiction 09-18-2002 10:55 PM

I find it interesting that some of the online "brands" are now more branded online than Playboy, Penthouse, and Hustler.

Here are some overture search numbers from last month:

658416 playboy
113985 penthouse
75002 hustler

798418 huns yellow page
650656 the hun
616110 sublime directory
514017 amp land
363609 thumbzilla
363039 world sex
375677 voyeur web
261515 persian kitty

Of course, the web sites above are free sites.

SpeakEasy 09-18-2002 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by FATPad
Playboy would be much smarter to just ignore the web. All the big, smart companies are doing that.
What Like penthouse did??...:1orglaugh

Lensman 09-18-2002 11:09 PM

Note to myself:

Topic: Playboy latching onto Adult.com

change to

Topic: Adult.com latching onto Playboy

Bobo 09-18-2002 11:11 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Lensman
Note to myself:

Topic: Playboy latching onto Adult.com

change to

Topic: Adult.com latching onto Playboy

Lens...not to worry. I don't think Hef is going to be reading this, but you probably know more than I do...

jimmyf 09-18-2002 11:39 PM

I wish you good luck Lensman.... and i hope you do not need any...:thumbsup :thumbsup

TrashTalk 09-19-2002 12:06 AM

Good luck Lensman!
I wish you all the best:thumbsup

Just don't forget to chat with us on the board when you are in the Mansion.:1orglaugh


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123