a thought regarding the 2257 news

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • rapmaster
    Confirmed User
    • Jan 2007
    • 1576

    #1

    a thought regarding the 2257 news

    Are people going to start scrapping their 2257 statements?
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SIG_Sauer_P226
  • Sebastian Sands
    Confirmed User
    • Mar 2005
    • 5223

    #2
    I highly doubt that

    Comment

    • baddog
      So Fucking Banned
      • Apr 2001
      • 107089

      #3
      Originally posted by rapmaster
      Are people going to start scrapping their 2257 statements?
      only the fools

      Comment

      • rapmaster
        Confirmed User
        • Jan 2007
        • 1576

        #4
        I agree, it would be foolish to take it down.

        I'm not exactly clear though on all the implications of the recent ruling. Does this mean the FBI 2257 inspection team is now out of work? I haven't read it in full yet but just scanned it and got an idea of what's up.

        I'd like to know how things are actually going to change.
        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SIG_Sauer_P226

        Comment

        • Fatdog
          Confirmed User
          • Feb 2006
          • 350

          #5
          i wouldnt. who knows they may try to overturn it or something. But what a Victory!

          Exclusive Niched Gay / Shemale Network!
          ICQ # 326-054-903

          Comment

          • Big_Red
            Confirmed User
            • Jun 2006
            • 4147

            #6
            read this very carefully. http://www.avn.com/index.cfm?objecti...4C18A90EAF3674

            only tennesee, ohio and some other state are out of the loop for now. well, from the article thats what i can decipher.
            60% Revshare.
            http://www.boobycash.com We got the boobs and the cash!
            ICQ 198-580-197 24/7 support

            Comment

            • After Shock Media
              It's coming look busy
              • Mar 2001
              • 35299

              #7
              Originally posted by Big_Red
              read this very carefully. http://www.avn.com/index.cfm?objecti...4C18A90EAF3674

              only tennesee, ohio and some other state are out of the loop for now. well, from the article thats what i can decipher.
              Well Miller and Reno/sun dance were also district rulings that were primarily held throughout the land, not a certainty though.

              As for the main question though, not only will I not ditch my 2257 documents, I will continue to cross reference, digitally track, as well as only purchase content that is what was known as 2257 compliant. Still fairly certain ignorance is not a defense and I really do not wish to be the first in a court room saying well they told me she was 18 when I ordered that content.

              My question is this, can those who were inspected in California as well as Florida go back to the courts and claim that the searches were illegal due to the fact that 2257 is unconstitutional and thus force rulings in other districts?

              [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

              Comment

              • AmateurPornDollars
                Registered User
                • Mar 2006
                • 17

                #8
                Would not be smart to throw 2257 to the wind.
                Amateur Porn Dollars

                Comment

                Working...