![]() |
a thought regarding the 2257 news
Are people going to start scrapping their 2257 statements?
|
I highly doubt that
|
Quote:
|
I agree, it would be foolish to take it down.
I'm not exactly clear though on all the implications of the recent ruling. Does this mean the FBI 2257 inspection team is now out of work? I haven't read it in full yet but just scanned it and got an idea of what's up. I'd like to know how things are actually going to change. |
i wouldnt. who knows they may try to overturn it or something. But what a Victory!
|
read this very carefully. http://www.avn.com/index.cfm?objecti...4C18A90EAF3674
only tennesee, ohio and some other state are out of the loop for now. well, from the article thats what i can decipher. |
Quote:
As for the main question though, not only will I not ditch my 2257 documents, I will continue to cross reference, digitally track, as well as only purchase content that is what was known as 2257 compliant. Still fairly certain ignorance is not a defense and I really do not wish to be the first in a court room saying well they told me she was 18 when I ordered that content. My question is this, can those who were inspected in California as well as Florida go back to the courts and claim that the searches were illegal due to the fact that 2257 is unconstitutional and thus force rulings in other districts? |
Would not be smart to throw 2257 to the wind.
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:41 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123