![]() |
Realistic chances of a WW3 & repercussions?
I give it a 100% chance of happening, at some point.
But lets give our thoughts on lets say the next "2" years. I'm leaning toward a 50% shot. Lets talk precursors....& indicators Russia has been promoting "teen sex camps" & an overall population increase agenda for the past year. In other words...have babies. Why? Why would a country promote such a thing? Well the obvious notion is that Russia could actually be our ally in a WW3 situation. We'll get into why thats important under "repercussions" The Chinese govt has been hacking into & testing the security of (so far that we know of) both the U.S. & Germany. North Korea & Iran are both becoming Nuclear threats. The chinese are becoming economic threats, & by becoming an economic threat, are also becoming a "communist revival" threat. Now lets talk repercussions, or "chain of events". Israel attacks Syria (which may have already happened). Syria attacks Israel, Iran supports Syria, to which we respond by launching air strikes on Iran & Syria. Israeli ground troops/tanks move into Syria. Russia & China now have an issue. They have Iran, a major supplier of oil for china, & a country russian arms have been going to for years. This is where it gets interesting. If we send one foot soldier into Iran, Russia will have to send troops in to "protect their interest" as well. Once this happens, WW3 has been mobilized. Without a shot fired between russia & the U.S. China is then free to take back Taiwan because all of our forces are now tied up with Iraq, Syria, Iran (countering each Russian installment with one of our own), & protecting Israel. China now seeing weakness/opportunity attacks Taiwan (if Taiwan does not give up immediately or we honor our protection treaty) & the world spins into ww3. Is this the beginning of a east v.s. west war for the oil? What are your thoughts? And which if any strategy/possible moves do you think i have right/wrong in the actual event of war? And my biggest question is, which side will the Russians take? Even as a broken nation...they still have the only population base large enough to take on the Chinese in the world. Their "baby making" campaign, has me in the hopes they take our side to take on the Chinese billion. |
i see no one here has any background in battle strategy, or interest in it?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953_Iranian_coup_d'%C3%A9tat "In the 1953 Iranian coup d'état, the administration of U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower orchestrated the overthrow of the democratically-elected administration of Prime Minister Mohammed Mosaddeq and his cabinet from power." |
its all wrong it will come down to non muslim nations vs muslim nations
|
As with the Cuban Missile Crisis and the Bay of Pigs, our only hope is that cooler heads prevail. People must remember the utterly devastating effects of nuclear war and look back in history to Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Unfortunately, none of the superpowers currently have very clear-thinking leaders in terms of diplomacy and averting war at all cost. It goes without saying there are no winners in a global nuclear war. We all lose. Time to stock up the bomb shelter with more Molsons. |
What scares me is when some towel-head dictator finds out he has advanced cancer and wants to take the infidels with him on his way out.
|
Quote:
|
We are not the only nation telling China to stay our of Taiwan.
|
Quote:
I'll pass on the nuclear winter. Cheers |
I doubt it,there would be too much money to be lost.
|
maybe, its hard to tell
|
WWIII would not neccessarly mean going nuclear.
Russia is also wanting people to have kids because they were having a negative population growth. Sort of like china has a very big issue of almost an entire generation of no females and still trying to get over a social stigma of having or keeping female children. I also see Iran as the great boogyman, specially since N Korea did not pan out to well. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Nobody really wants mutually assured destruction. Sure the low level unable to read jihadist might, the real powers that be are just as greedy and egotistical as the rest of mankind. They want to rule it all and convert the rest of us. |
Quote:
Not to mention they already took our Iran's nuclear program once with their raid on the reactor. Pick up some history books gents. |
Quote:
:pimp |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/d...00/3014623.stm |
Quote:
Not to mention the state of Israel was almost on the verge of defeat during the beginning of the 7 day war v.s. a much smaller force. |
Quote:
at one point israel was on the verge of defeat fighting countries that did not have russian technology israel has one deterrent for iran.......a nuke in a gift basket there for Israel will never fight Iran, (well maybe air support for us) if we should need it against syria, while we take on iran and WW3 doesn't necessarily have to be nuclear.....we can goto war without nukes, even with the other major powers...its when one side starts losing badly that the nukes come out of the closet :pimp:pimp |
Quote:
By the way, it's the 6 Day War, and please explain at what point Israel was ever at the verge of defeat? The Egyptians had to put out false propaganda stating that to get Syria involved...did you fall for that, too, 40 years after the fact? |
Quote:
I never said it was easy sport. But the fact remains they took on all their neighbors at once, and won in 6 days. Period. :pimp |
Quote:
anyways this is not a thread about the 6 & 1/2 day war :1orglaugh |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:40 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123