GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Embeded image copyright tracking in JPEG 2000 standard (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=774118)

pussyserver - BANNED FOR LIFE 10-04-2007 09:12 AM

Embeded image copyright tracking in JPEG 2000 standard
 
Embeded image copyright tracking in JPEG 2000 standards

wouldnt that be nice :)

sweetpurple04 10-04-2007 09:13 AM

it will catch the terrrosists

pornguy 10-04-2007 09:13 AM

Digimark. Photo shop has it.

pussyserver - BANNED FOR LIFE 10-04-2007 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornguy (Post 13186213)
Digimark. Photo shop has it.

digimark is not incorporated into the standard .. in other works in order to decode JPEG code the viewer would have to support the active tracking embed

even cooler, what if the image or any copies of could check in once a month and report its location if viewable via port 80 i.e the web

JMM 10-04-2007 09:19 AM

We used to use digimarc a loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong time ago.

Digimarc even has a spider that will search the internet for your content and email you a report.

Here is the problem with digimarc, at least this was the problem when we used it.

When you digimarc the photos, you have to select a setting between 1 and 5.

1, 2, and sometimes 3, the spider never found the images.

4 and 5 always caught the images. However, using 4 or 5 degraded the image noticeably.

Although, that was 10 years ago. With the 12, 13, 16 megapixel cameras being used now, it might not matter.

pornguy 10-04-2007 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JMM (Post 13186245)
We used to use digimarc a loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong time ago.

Digimarc even has a spider that will search the internet for your content and email you a report.

Here is the problem with digimarc, at least this was the problem when we used it.

When you digimarc the photos, you have to select a setting between 1 and 5.

1, 2, and sometimes 3, the spider never found the images.

4 and 5 always caught the images. However, using 4 or 5 degraded the image noticeably.

Although, that was 10 years ago. With the 12, 13, 16 megapixel cameras being used now, it might not matter.

I have not tested them lately either, but the report back about where your images were, was awesome.

pornguy 10-04-2007 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pussyserver (Post 13186232)
digimark is not incorporated into the standard .. in other works in order to decode JPEG code the viewer would have to support the active tracking embed

even cooler, what if the image or any copies of could check in once a month and report its location if viewable via port 80 i.e the web

They do report where the images are, but via an e-mail. Now I have not used that in YEARS.


So things could have changed.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123