Britney sex tape?
 

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/showbi...%27/article.do


Find this guy, and edit this vid to make him look better.. hehe.

Wheres the video

i think Kb has the tape...

KB is full of shit.

I heard about this on the radio this morning.... I hope it's true!

Heard the rumors too. The guy apparently filmed it secretly. He's from Hawaii. I say who cares. I like porn just as much as the next guy. But after all of the "celebrity" sex tapes that I've seen I could care less. They are all boring (with the possible exception of 30-60 seconds of the Pam and Tom tape), not to mention Britney is not hot anymore and probably boring as fuck in the sack. All this adds up to "who gives a flying fuck"?

Once again, unless Britney signs off a model release and provides 2257 documentation, it can't be easily used commercially. That she was apparently drunk and passed on somewhere on the tape would also suggest that she wasn't in condition to consent to filming (to fill the model release) and understand what it meant.

Major ass lawsuit, and not very much upside on this one. Load it up on your chinese tube sites and call it even.

I'd hit her :)

It's all about the Benjamins...

Britney still sells so I bet it would be a huge success...assuming there's a model release and 2257...

I'd love to see it!

Matt

I knew she was a whore.

Bullshit!

Do you really need a model release to use the content? Do you need to give consent? I don't think so. The contenet is always owned by the photographer because the photographer created the photo - not the people in it.

You don't really need 2257 - Everyone knows she's legal. Might foul you up in 2257 laws but that's gonna be the least of his problems....

Oh what ever and who cares? i'm tired of her.

I don't think i'd want to see a video of her unless it was age 18. Shes has been cute for the last 4 years without photoshop or make up.

???? i dnt c anything????

There has got to be better fat amateur people fucking on video somewhere.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

good point!

yes, because Paris signed a model release and provided 2257 docs

moron.

Rochard,

You are wrong on that one...It's called 'Right to Publicity' or something like that. A photog just can't take a stars pic for and use it for anything you want.

Unless it is for news that is:winkwink::thumbsup

This tape doesn't exist

Not true Richard-
You should know this better than anyone.
2257 along with two forms of Identification is NEEDED.
Also a release stating she gives her consent to sell her likeness commercially.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=xcLSjgH0b74

This video may educate some

I'm pretty sure I remember she did...eventually... at least on the first one...not sure on the storage stuff

:thumbsup

Bingo

signup below and get your links up.

(hit me up for "customs" :))

~Ray
icq 94994627

:thumbsup:winkwink:

There was no release on the storage stuff-
That's why the videos haven't seen the light of day....yet.

Although I know people who know some people who represent people that are involved with the lockers contents. I believe someday you WILL see some of that footage, I just don't think you'll see any nudity or sex

I'll believe it when I see it