![]()  | 
	
		
 XBIZ breaking news - five 2257 inspections in Florida last week 
		
		
		Very few details are available at this time, but the FBI has confirmed that their 2257 inspection team conducted five inspections of Florida-based producers last week. 
	Read the rest of the story here. - Q.  | 
		
 Wow!!!!!!!!!!!!! 
	There are so many churches in Florida. Bibles everywhere. I was scared living down there.  | 
		
 Quote: 
	
 ouch, if this is a content producer, how in the hell can you not keep photo docs of your content, can't wait to hear which company this.... unbelievable.  | 
		
 inspections are starting up in force.. lots of peeps are gonna be muffed. get ready for bubba in cell block 5. 
	 | 
		
 Reminds me of Berlin 1939 and we are all wearing a yellow star. 
	 | 
		
 Quote: 
	
 In adult we think of producers as anyone whom shoots content, so it's crazy to think anyone like that wouldn't have IDs. However the FBI thinks anyone whom builds a webpage, is producing content. So it's pretty common for some guy (maybe just an affiliate) to not have any IDs. I do think these inspections make one thing perfectly clear. They aren't out there looking for CP sites and going after the real criminals. So far seems everyone they have inspected has been on the legit side of adult and IMO this is looking more and more as a way to go after people for record violations rather than actually fighting CP and protecting children. go figure who would have thought....  | 
		
 I have found out a little bit more information on the inspections conducted in Florida last week. 
	One of the companies that was inspected was CandidCam; earlier today AVN quoted Bill Fisher of Filthy Films as saying that VoyeurDorm was among those inspected, but according to their attorney, it was the records for CandidCam and not VoyeurDorm that the FBI was interested in. More information in the updated article here.  | 
		
 At this point, it still appears that they are going after "primary" style producers, although cam sites may be somewhat different. 
	 | 
		
 Where are the GFY Republicans like DaddyHalbucks? 
	 | 
		
 Candid Cam is in Tampa, not Miami. Lots of producers in Tampa area. 
	 | 
		
 Quote: 
	
  | 
		
 Yeah, seriously, I didn't know too much info could be a violation :mad: 
	Quote: 
	
  | 
		
 More detail about the muck-a-muck: 
	Quote: 
	
 But the jackasses at the DOJ that are brining forth these mandates are just well beyond asinine.  | 
		
 FSC either dropped the ball on this big time and we are paying for it or they fucking sold us out, example - offers fees for protection yet protection doesn't exist with new law, now offering discount 2257 software which we wouldn't need if they killed this in the first place. :boid 
	 | 
		
 "Another violation involved having too much data with the records for a given title, Dolan said. In that instance, records for performers who had nonsex roles in the video were included in the records for the performers who did engage in sexually explicit conduct. Curing that violation involved merely removing the records for the nonsex performers, Dolan said." 
	I thought we had to have records for everyone if there was someone being naked/sexual in the frame pretty much? Now we only need the people being sexual?  | 
		
 Anyone see the Deep Throat documentary?  I was watching some of it yesterday.  Just seeing the history of the porn biz struggle was very interesting. 
	On another note, I couldn't believe they showed Linda Lovelace actually deep throating. How did they get away with showing that on HBO?  | 
		
 Quote: 
	
  | 
		
 Quote: 
	
  | 
		
 bump for important news. 
	 | 
		
 Ok shit now I have to seperate whom is sexually active and who is not by scene. Ok looks like it is back to my database and time to add in a new group. Oh well, my lawyer interpreted the first 2257 as needing everyone filmed. 
	Shit what if the person is nude only or... ok fuck it I will just have to break it down and put in groups of each act in each scene. Gawd damnit ok that is gunna be another few months of work.  | 
		
 wow, this is scary shit. 
	 | 
		
 Quote: 
	
 I don't even think they have any clue exactly what the fuck being "in compliance" means. Talk about a clusterfuck of vaguely written governmental muck-a-muck. Everytime I see the FBI quoted about 2257 I see them saying "good point we'll have to get the DOJ to nail that issue down" etc. etc. blah blah. If even the fucking FBI inspectors aren't clear as to what the fuck the 2257 regs say, how in the hell are all of us suppose to follow them? The whole damn thing is so far beyond being ridiculous, that if the attorneys involved with the FSC can't get it all thrown out, they should find themselves another profession. Perhaps manufacturing playdough or something similar.  | 
		
 Quote: 
	
 :disgust  | 
		
 Quote: 
	
  | 
		
 Quote: 
	
 :2 cents:  | 
		
  | 
		
 Quote: 
	
 Dateline gets more of these freaks in a month than the Feds will get in a decade.  | 
		
 Details continue to emerge in this story - I've posted a new article after confirming additional facts with Chuck Joyner, who serves as the head of the FBI's inspection team. 
	Among other things, Joyner said that all five of the producers inspected last week were primary producers, and that the FBI currently has no additional inspections scheduled in the Florida area. More info in the article linked above. I'll continue to update as more details come to light.  | 
		
 If it happened last week its not very breaking news bro. 
	2CENTS.  | 
		
 Quote: 
	
 Then I figure wouldnt the FSC send out a newsletter to its members about it? Then wouldnt those members come to gfy and quote it everywhere in lots of threads? Neither happened and well story was given (broke) in this thread.  | 
		
 Looks like its time to move. 
	 | 
		
 Quote: 
	
 Another way, perhaps, is to take the position that news is only news once it becomes known. When a story first comes to light, as this one did yesterday, that is when the news first 'broke,' under that line of reasoning. Does that seem an unreasonable or indefensible position to you?  | 
		
 I read in avn they plan on doing a total of 17 inspections in fl. 
	 | 
		
 Quote: 
	
  | 
		
 Quote: 
	
 As I recall, the AVN story quoted a producer who was not among those inspected as saying that there were 17 inspections scheduled in FL I'm not sure what his source for that claim was, but Joyner flatly denied it.  | 
		
 I have ACCIDENTLY stumbled across CP when on various link lists and shady TGPs. If they really wanted to find CP they can find it. It's all so transparent what they're trying to do. 
	 | 
		
 Quote: 
	
 1) After gathering more info, my understanding is that the inspection team did not write up a violation for having records for people who participated in nonsex roles mixed in with those who engaged in sex acts; they were only interested in the IDs for those that engaged in sex acts, but it was not considered a "violation" that the other IDs/docs were in there. 2) Regardless of what the FBI considers to be a violation or not a violation, theirs is not the final say in all this. As far as how the law is interpreted for the purposes of prosecuting alleged offenders, that's entirely up to the DOJ. (That said, if the FBI does not cite you for a given "violation," even if the DOJ wouldn't agree that you were compliant on that point, it is highly unlikely that you would be prosecuted for the violation in question.) 3) Regardless of what the FBI, producers who have been inspected, or any of the adult media outlets and representatives say (myself definitely included) you should speak at length to an attorney with relevant knowledge and expertise about your individual situation, and get specific and detailed advice about what you need to do to be and stay 2257 compliant.  | 
		
 Quote: 
	
  | 
		
 Quote: 
	
  | 
		
 Quote: 
	
  | 
		
 Quote: 
	
  | 
		
 Quote: 
	
  | 
		
 Quote: 
	
 I wonder if it's a jailable "violation" if there's a spelling or typing error in the cross-referencings? I would hope a judge would quickly toss that out! I can just imagine the looks on judge's faces when some of this gets to court!! dave  | 
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:19 AM. | 
	Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
	
	©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123