GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - Linktrade question for you SEO gurus

- Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)

- - Linktrade question for you SEO gurus (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=761423)

Linktrade question for you SEO gurus

does google see the link back http://www.mypornsite.com as a differnent site if linked to via http://www.MyPornSite.com or for that matter HTTP://WWW.MYPORNSITE.COM?

thanks

that was funny though

Thats a no starpimps... Are you wondering if webmasters spelled your domain wrong that you would not get your traffic ?

.

Short answer, No.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Balalsubturfyooj (Post 12949095)

Thats a no starpimps... Are you wondering if webmasters spelled your domain wrong that you would not get your traffic ?

.

your answer is right, but logic is flawed.

Google does see link to http://mypornsite.com and http://www.mypornsite.com as different, since linking with or without www is also in control of other webmasters .. but it still affects the PageRank, TrustRank passed and ranking, and of course in turn traffic.

lol..

no, im saying as far as google PR and ranking is concerned. not click through traffic.
just like "http://www.mypornsite.com" is diff then "http://mypornsite.com"

i recall reading something about this somewhere thats why i brought it up

nope... google will not see it as a different link back... :2 cents:

i wish i could find the source of where i read this
thanks everyone so far =)

Actually Vick!... the www is the subdomain of a domain and yea it does get picked up a bit differently however the example above was as follows:

"does google see the link back http://www.mypornsite.com as a differnent site if linked to via http://www.MyPornSite.com or for that matter HTTP://WWW.MYPORNSITE.COM?"

The above question had only one domain and that was:

http://www.mypornsite.com

not

http://mypornsite.com

.

yea subdomains are way different then capitalization

Caps make zero difference. Focus on natural anchor text and the content that references the link.

:2 cents:

Quote:

Originally Posted by darnit (Post 12949287)

Caps make zero difference. Focus on natural anchor text and the content that references the link.

:2 cents:

:upsidedow

Quote:

Originally Posted by starpimps (Post 12949151)

i wish i could find the source of where i read this
thanks everyone so far =)

I posted this in your other thread, but maybe it's interesting for others, too:

Quote:

1. A "name" (Net, Host, Gateway, or Domain name) is a text string up
to 24 characters drawn from the alphabet (A-Z), digits (0-9), minus
sign (-), and period (.). Note that periods are only allowed when
they serve to delimit components of "domain style names". (See
RFC-921, "Domain Name System Implementation Schedule", for
background). No blank or space characters are permitted as part of a
name. No distinction is made between upper and lower case. The first
character must be an alpha character. The last character must not be
a minus sign or period. A host which serves as a GATEWAY should have
"-GATEWAY" or "-GW" as part of its name. Hosts which do not serve as
Internet gateways should not use "-GATEWAY" and "-GW" as part of
their names. A host which is a TAC should have "-TAC" as the last
part of its host name, if it is a DoD host. Single character names
or nicknames are not allowed.

That's from RFC952, which specifies how a host table is set up.

Well it's better to linktrade with www.For some reason it's better seo result then.

Quote:

Originally Posted by donborno (Post 12949488)

I posted this in your other thread, but maybe it's interesting for others, too:

That's from RFC952, which specifies how a host table is set up.

good answer thx

Quote:

Originally Posted by KlenTelaris (Post 12949657)

Well it's better to linktrade with www.For some reason it's better seo result then.

The better result is going to be due to consistency. If you have all your incoming without www it should be the same as if they were all www.