GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Where is the 2257 link on this page for the titties in the corner? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=758135)

Secksy 08-07-2007 12:35 AM

Where is the 2257 link on this page for the titties in the corner?
 
I'm just curious where the 2257 link is for the ImLive picture advert in the corner? Or the explicit banners that are posted here? Are forums exempt? I am somewhat confused :helpme:helpme

bobby666 08-07-2007 02:56 AM

maybe somewhere .......

donborno 08-07-2007 03:12 AM

Whoever produces any book, magazine, periodical, film, videotape, or other matter which contains one or more visual depictions made after November 1, 1990 of actual sexually explicit conduct

RayBonga 08-07-2007 03:14 AM

OMFG! Wait until FIBI finds out :helpme

c-lo 08-07-2007 03:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by donborno (Post 12889706)
Whoever produces any book, magazine, periodical, film, videotape, or other matter which contains one or more visual depictions made after November 1, 1990 of actual sexually explicit conduct

That's part of the ancient regs...they've been updated. Now pretty much anything beyond a tight-fit tee needs documentation. :Oh crap

Secksy: I guess they think they're exempt.

LaoTzu 08-07-2007 05:33 AM

Best thing for the entire industry would be if the FBI went after GFY. See what happens when the government puts all those high post counts in jeopardy :1orglaugh
I can't think of anything that would solidify the WM community better than that actually. Somebody dime in GFY!

Secksy 08-07-2007 07:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by c-lo (Post 12889739)
That's part of the ancient regs...they've been updated. Now pretty much anything beyond a tight-fit tee needs documentation. :Oh crap

Secksy: I guess they think they're exempt.


And that was what I gathered as well. Hmmm. Oh well :1orglaugh

Kevsh 08-07-2007 07:36 AM

Going by that theory they would need 2257 for just about every 2nd thread posted on this site ...

TheDoc 08-07-2007 07:45 AM

With the current 2257 law, they don't need it for the girl... And since they know who the advertisers are they can point them to the people that have the records.

Not that hard to figure out.

LAJ 08-07-2007 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RayBonga (Post 12889710)
OMFG! Wait until FIBI finds out :helpme

Do you not think that someone from the FBI is on this site every day?

tranza 08-07-2007 09:55 AM

GFY never had any 2257 link...

c-lo 08-07-2007 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 12890438)
With the current 2257 law, they don't need it for the girl... And since they know who the advertisers are they can point them to the people that have the records.

Not that hard to figure out.

Her nipples are exposed, so they do. The fact that they know the advertisers means nothing. I know of all the sponsors that I get my promo material from, but that doesn't make me exempt from record-keeping.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevsh (Post 12890404)
Going by that theory they would need 2257 for just about every 2nd thread posted on this site ...

I haven't found a clause in the current regs that says they don't have to. Assuming that they don't keep records, I would say it's for the same reason that many others don't; they doubt that they'll be inspected.

Quote:

Originally Posted by tranza (Post 12890956)
GFY never had any 2257 link...

That doesn't mean they aren't supposed to, though. Right?

I'm not meaning to argue here. I often wonder why they don't have a link as well. I'm sure there are feds on this site every day, so you'd think these guys would know that & prepare for it. But then again maybe they are prepared & just haven't posted a link.

TheDoc 08-07-2007 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by c-lo (Post 12894306)
Her nipples are exposed, so they do. The fact that they know the advertisers means nothing. I know of all the sponsors that I get my promo material from, but that doesn't make me exempt from record-keeping.

Nipples are fine under the current law. The banners, might, make them secondary producers, but they never reproduced anything and forums fall under some other laws too.

They probably should have a statement, at least listing the sponsor/banners with a 2257 link to the sponsors 2257 page, it's something which is better than nothing.

gandalfuy 08-07-2007 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LAJ (Post 12890906)
Do you not think that someone from the FBI is on this site every day?

:thumbsup

c-lo 08-08-2007 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 12894366)
Nipples are fine under the current law. The banners, might, make them secondary producers, but they never reproduced anything and forums fall under some other laws too.

They probably should have a statement, at least listing the sponsor/banners with a 2257 link to the sponsors 2257 page, it's something which is better than nothing.

Oh, I had no idea there were seperate laws regarding forums. You don't know which laws exactly, do you? And yeah, they should definitely have something...to at least show they tried to comply (if they have to.)

just a punk 08-08-2007 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tranza (Post 12890956)
GFY never had any 2257 link...

Especially in all those "would you hit it" threads. Perhaps the img links should be disabled? :Oh crap

StarkReality 08-08-2007 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by c-lo (Post 12894306)
Her nipples are exposed, so they do. The fact that they know the advertisers means nothing. I know of all the sponsors that I get my promo material from, but that doesn't make me exempt from record-keeping.

That's in the new, proposed version, but not in the current one.

davecummings 08-08-2007 04:37 PM

I heard that genitals needed to be 2257 declared. But, boobs, too?

Dave

jeffrey 08-08-2007 04:39 PM

Oh am I glad to be Canadian.

davecummings 08-08-2007 04:41 PM

Also, see the important 2257 stuff here: http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=756075

Dave

Hammer 08-08-2007 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 12890438)
With the current 2257 law, they don't need it for the girl... And since they know who the advertisers are they can point them to the people that have the records.

Not that hard to figure out.

You need to get a clue, or talk to an attorney instead of talking out of your ass. They don't need to worry about the girl in the corner showing her boobs, but there are plenty of explicit photos posted on this site.

Then again, the ex owner has his affiliates convinced that they don't need to docs if they hotlink his content either.

TheDoc 08-08-2007 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammer (Post 12898976)
You need to get a clue, or talk to an attorney instead of talking out of your ass. They don't need to worry about the girl in the corner showing her boobs, but there are plenty of explicit photos posted on this site.

Then again, the ex owner has his affiliates convinced that they don't need to docs if they hotlink his content either.

I always talk out of my ass, it's amazing to see in person.

The posted photos are what falls under the forum laws, they aren't making the post, they don't need the records. The closest thing on this board that would need records is the banners.

I don't know what ex owner or program you are referring too.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123