People like DaddyHalbucks should not be allowed to have kids
 

Seriously, face facts his kids will come out as dumb as him.

I am actually surprised the fucking monkey knows how to turn a PC on let alone contect to the internet.

The guy would suck George Bushs cock if need be.

The people that read this thread should read my sig. :thumbsup

I like pie.

$10 banner special anyone?

Me to:thumbsup

Back in the 1980s, Ronald Reagan had his ardent critics. Now, he is universally viewed as a visionary and great President.

I predict the same will happen for GWB.

After the first US city is nuked or dirty-bombed by Islamic terrorists, GWB will be viewed as positively prescient. It is sad that it will take this to walk up an apathetic, slumbering, disconnected public.

If a US city is nuked or dirty-bombed by Islamic terrorists, it's likely that they're products of the war in Iraq - a country that had no weapons of mass destruction whatsoever and wasn't a threat to the USA.

Might as well save your energy, there's no convincing the guy. He still thinks that the war was won and everyone is home asleep in their beds peacefully.

isn't he a bot? it looks like...

See Sig :1orglaugh

Useless thread........

I think it's all been a joke, no one is this foolish.

Don't worry! He was born without testicles, so he is physically unable to "have kids."

But . . . if he did have kids, you could wish that they would die in Iraq fighting in that "war" that should have never occurred in the first place and that is doing nothing but building stronger resentment and new enemies against the US.

i am here ... but can someone tell me why?

No he's not. He conducted a treasonous secret war in Nicaragua, and he took out a huge number of short-term, high interest loans to prop up the US economy for the remainder of his term, thereby tanking the presidency of his successor Bush the elder.

Reagan was a piece of shit who actually claimed senility to avoid legal responsibility for his worst mistakes, and his presidency will be judged accordingly regardless of the frantic effort by conservatives to deify him and name everything but your grandmother's outdoor shithouse after him.

And if the 'first us city is nuked' it will have happened for the same reason 9-11 happened. Bush and his incompetent staff are more concerned with controlling the american populace than anything else, and they have NO skills whatsoever for actually governing in a responsible manner.

It is important to note that many of my President's critics on this board are foreigners. Frankly, I could not care less what foreigners think about GWB.

Many of the US liberals who oppose Bush dislike him for domestic matters, such as his adult entertainment, abortion, tax, and social policies --but they recognize his vulnerability due to the war, and so they go after him for that. In doing so, they endanger their fellow citizens who are troops and they generally weaken their own country. Is it really a stretch to call that treason?

The one thing you don't hear anybody say about Bush is that he doesn't genuinely care about his country and want it to be secure.

Anyone who can remotely define that as "treason" is suffering from a mental deficiency.

The rest of you post is the rambling of an idiot with the usual perceived "enemies". Do you feel threatened in some way? :)

Forget answering the last post/question - you just answered it.

If you think the current Administration have "secured" anything - you are having a delusion again :thumbsup

It all depends on your time frame. Halfway through WWII, it looked dire too. In fact, the US came darn close to losing WWII. And we had to fight in two theaters, half a world apart. If it had not been for Hitler's megalomania and his mad foray into Russia, things might have turned out very differently.

The Dems have been very successful about exploiting the US public's inpatience.

Nation building is a long term exercise.

I hope it wont happen. But in case it does, it will be the outcome of Afghan and Iraq war :2 cents:

I like Ben&Jerry's Ice Cream

Time frame?? Why are you rambling back to WW2 to try and create a point?? Never noticed any other lessons being learned from history by the US govt before - why now?

Why keep talking about "Dems" and "liberals"?? Around 70% of the US people do not appeciate the current admin and even less appreciate the other houses. Are 70% of the population "dems" and "liberals"? Nope.

Nation building is certainly not what is happening now - more like nation destruction. Tho there is a 'gift' in managing to create as many "enemies" as possible while driving the country into an economic swamp. Sure don't sound like "nation building" :1orglaugh

DaddyHalbucks, do you believe this war in Iraq was 100% necessary for our safety?

They got chocolate flavor? :winkwink:

Don't you know PK that Iraq was a menace and all the WMD's were hidden in rivers and others transported to Iran and still more flown to Sudan? :winkwink:

There is irrefutable gossip to prove this and it came from impeccable intell sources - the same sources who provided the same concrete evidence to the UN :)

What, to you, are we getting out of nation building in Iraq?

Secondly, what do you think would have happened (by now, or in the future) had Saddam remained in power? Be specific for this one. What harm would he have caused us?

Saddam had already: invaded Kuwait which destabilized oil, murdered hundreds of thousands of his own people, use WMD in Halabja in 1988 against civilians, attempted to assasinate a US President (George HW Bush), etc..

Right there, you have plenty of reasons to take out Saddam.

But yes, Saddam did have WMD and a massive program to hide them. The UN found ample evidence of this.

I love the short term memory about what Saddam did do, and what Saddam was capable of. Fucking ridiculous how much lefty liberal nujobs like Webby aka Greywolf will twist shit around.

The US supplied arms to, among others, a vicious dictator in Chile and also became involved in killing many thousands of innocent people under that leader's rule. It was well-known this leader was a killer and thug, not only to the US, but the rest of the world. That never stopped the US being this man's ally.

Linked to that the US setup a torture training center in Panama and trained a majority of the most vicious dictators in Latin and South America - as well as in other countries. The US trained these people in how to oppress their populations - and how to torture them if there was resistance. It is also rumored, but unconfirmed, that Saddam was a "pupil" at the "US torture school" when he was a US bedfellow.

Right there, you have plenty reasons to take out the then US government? No??

Can you please advise the UN of your authoritative findings - thanks :winkwink:

Monday Morning Quarterbacking is always easier than playing in the game itself.

However, removing Saddam was justified by his single bad act of trying to assasinate a US President (GWB's father). That single act alone justified removing Saddam. Add on his other mis-deeds in his extremely long bill of particulars, and it is a no brainer.

Saddam was a brutal Hitler like figure.

Did Saddam pose a direct threat to our country, to the vital interests of our country, to his neighbors, to his own people, and to world peace?

No question: yes.

There are a lot of ruthless dictators in the world. Just look at some of the genocide that is taking place in Africa that we pretend doesn't happen because they don't have oil. North Korea's dictator enslaves his people, and some of the Central/South American countries are run by vicious men as well.

Saddam was capable of bad stuff many years ago, not these days. His army was destroyed in the first gulf war and we made it impossible for him to re-grow. He was just a loon who got the Sunnis and Shi'ites to get along by barbaric dictatorship. Nothing we don't see in hundreds of countries throughout the world.

19 of the hijackers on 9/11 came from Saudi Arabia. Most of the money and terrorists in Iraq right now are coming from Saudi Arabia. Yet we just sold them $20 billion dollars worth of military equipment. Go figure.

If that is the case, why are you not fighting? I can tell you that if I felt my country was in grave danger from another, I would be fighting to defend it.

Perhaps you would like to lend your crystal ball/ fortune telling services to the US State Department. I am sure they would be very interested in your ability to identify future malfeasants.

Oh, and I'd be interested in having you pick some stocks for me.

:upsidedow

Has the US stopped assassinations of leaders of other countries at the moment, or is this still in place??

He posed a "direct threat" to the US??? Really - never knew that - GFY is so good for crucial information. What were the "vital interests" of your country?? Na.. forget it. Waste of time listening to the ramblings of greed and attempted justifications for that greed.

What's this term "future malfeasants"??? Where did that come from??

There is no crystal ball necessary and no "future malfeasants" since these acts of oppression were with the full knowledge and involvement of the US government at that time. Ask some of the families of over 30,000 people who got a bullet in the head thanks to the expert torturing training and arms supply by the US plus many thousand more who were tortured - all these people have much to thank they US and CIA involvement for fucking their lives.

Your pathetic attempt to "disown" involvement either shows your total ignorance or refusual to accept fact. Either way - it's is totally offensive to victims.

Keep asking DH that question, but he's prob too busy trading his 4000 domains, spamming webmaster boards and being a player in the adult industry he drifted into a couple of years ago.

If a time did come PK - this is a sample of the people who would be last in line. It's all about a dollar and talking the talk without walking the walk - what's new? :winkwink:

Do you think Iraq is better now?

Incidentally nation building was done by your forefathers. Now I admit to being quite clueless about your constitution but I see frequent reports about the current government seemingly tearing up the laws and giving themselves the right to do as they please. Now that may be propaganda, but Im a believer in the adage of theres no smoke without fire.

Too damn funny... the entire world and 75% of Americans all think Bush is a friggin retard.
Yet here we have someone defending him like he's a saint.

You're loyal to the core, gotta give ya that :1orglaugh

daddy troll bucks is a spammer

damn he posted like 5 times without listing a long page of refferal codes...

always like how the gung ho type patriots do their ramblings sitting in front of their computer and then call others who dont agree traitors. I guess when the time came to enlist you were too busy reading "SPAM ME SPONSORS" threads..

I gotta agree with the halbucks back before the war started
I did genuinly believe that iraq had WMD and they would use it on other countries. but when the discovered none I thought there must be another reason for attacking. I mean come on America knows everything, they would have easily known through spies that if iraq had wmd from the beginning.

And people say its a good thing they attacked because of the atrocities occuring in iraq? Why doesnt america help out africa? tonnes of people are dieing through famin and rich warlords yet america sits back and twiddles its thumbs.

Iraq is now a can of worms and worse than before saddam was leading(of course i do not know this for fact as i have not visted) and infact the meddling has worsend all situations.

The middle east has always been a huge mess and in my opinion will always be. let them be, dont intervine. but then oil comes into the question... and i cannot carry on as I am out of my depths when it comes to oil

IMO daddyhalbucks has taken a huge piece of bait and swallowed it and that bait is called propoganda. its no real surprise at all it happens to weak minded people. but then again, I swallowed it before the war. so im no better.

I don't claim the US is perfect.

Scotty,

What truly is "weak minded" is to swallow the John Kerry/ Hillary Clinton/ Barack Obama/ Jack Reed line of crap that Iraq is a lost war, a lost cause, a waste of American lives, etc..

As we discovered after WWII, nation building takes decades. Eastern Europe took 50 years to completely free from Nazis and then the Communists. Why don't the Dems ever use that as a benchmark? Gee, I wonder.

It's brilliant propaganda. But in the end it hurts our country.

Just some history knowledge. Republicans were against rebuilding Europe and fought it very hard. I guess they just didn't enough oil.

But you still ignored my question. If this war was necessary for our safety as a country, why are you not fighting in it?

please work on this, there is no period or capilisation in this statement- that complicates it too much. it is simply:

i like pie