wow.. congrats to MrSkin.com. did not know you guys were pullin this kindda cheese in
 

:pimp
http://news.com.com/Site+billing+its...l?tag=nefd.top

just out of curiosity, how does he do 2257?

congrats

Very nice #'s .. they've built one hell of a brand and I'm not surprised to see they do that well. they have a great team over there also ..:thumbsup

Thats some nice $$$. :thumbsup

Hollywood exception.

the largest celeb "skin" site in the world and you didn't know they were doing those kind of #'s?

personally, I would have actually thought they made WAY more

yeah they're the biggest, but all guesses for membership base are always conservative. but$5.3 mil is definitely outstanding (for a 2257 flawed site) :)

I would have guessed the revenues as higher with as many employees and affiliates as they have.... They run a tight ship over there as everybody already knows and contribute quite a bit to our community with Adult Who's Who and by sending Derrick to all the shows... he's such a riot! :)

Cheers,

Brad

they are not 2257 flawed in the least bit

you need to read up and maybe talk to a lawyer regarding exactly how they operate

also, take into consideration that most movie studios have a legal agreement with mrskin.com

who needs a lawyer? you seem to be boy genius on 2257. please break it down for me how they're not fuckin flawed when it comes to 2257 and legal model releases overall. continue on...

there is plenty of information posted on various boards directly from mrskin.com regarding their legality when it comes to 2257

I am not boy genius about anything, I just read a lot

sorry to have offended you so greatly

so you get your info from messages boards, and draw the great conclusion that they operate within the boudaries of the law? do you shoot content brah?

That's a nice article. Congrats to Jim, Derek, and the gang.

Regards,

Mike

thanks for trying to lure me into this wonderfully intelligent internet fight, but unfortunately I am not going to bite

think first. post. then repeat process...

wow, you are CUTE!

well, considering I already answered your question previously, you might consider doing the same :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

here, let me repeat it

is there a clause in 2257 that film shot before a certain year is exempt? I remember reading that they have a lot of obscure footage that makes me wonder how they would comply with 2257 as well.

Could someone that knows more on the subject expand on this?

Thanks guys. We are really happy about the article.

unless you're a fuckin lawyer yourself, there've been no questions answered.
you admitted yourself in making assumptions on something you read on their own board. then you wanna advise me to talk to a lawyer?!? you're a fuckin idiot. i'm out..

I tend to agree, I thought it would have been higher, especially considering the staffing and ongoing costs.
WG

gotta love gfy! :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:error:error:error

yep... gotta love gfy because of trolls like you :) 3 years, 31,497 posts, wow! hope you're making money, homie :)

Very nice. :thumbsup

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

fuck.. i just did a search on your name. totally forgot that you're the idiot who started this bullshit http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?p=12483616
trying to ruin occash's cred. what a fuckin troll. i hope we never cross path. no seriously!

:upsidedow:upsidedow:upsidedow:upsidedow:upsidedow :upsidedow