How many threads per page is right?
 

There are over 200 active threads today. Do you click to page 2 and 3 and so on?

GFY has 50 per page. Should it be more?

I think 50 is fine. It's not all that hard to click on the next page link, and it keeps things nice and fast. Although.. i do sometimes lose track of threads that go to the second page.. hmm...

50 is just fine, more will overload

Does a parole's opinion count? if so, yes, there should be 100 -150 per page in my opinion. I seldom ever go to page 2 or 3.

50 is already a lot. In netscape it takes a while to render the 50 so adding more will slow it down even more. Besides that, people on dialup will be more frustrated with > 50 threads/pg.

Leave the settings as it is, it works great as is.

WG

if it aint brooke dont fix, working great now and important posts will anyways be ontop

by the way thanks

Its rare that i go to page 2 or 3.

shemp

there should be a hack for vbulletin that lets the users chose how many threads they want to view...install it and keep the default at 50...

I think it should be 100 or so. I rarely ever make it to page 2 unless I am bored as hell.

50 is perfect.... if you change it, leave the option to set it individually to 50..... I do check out page 2 & 3 if I'm out for a long time, but generally if something slips to page 2 or 3, then it's pretty much lost it's interest already. I don't think increasing the threads per page would make much difference.... going down below 50 threads is still digging for something cuz you're bored or catching up, whether it's on a different page or not.... :2 cents:

There's a page 2? :winkwink:

Just let the webmasters who have nothing better to do (work) set their own preferences and all will be right with the world.

*insert shiny happy "ahhhhh" music here*

i have problem with 50

49 is cool for me

50 is good.
100 would be better to view, but sometimes even 50 threads timeout when I load GFY via dialup.
so, 50 is good.

I would make it 100, I never hit page 2.

Netscape users don't count.

48

i like more like 100 or 150 like others said

or make it adjustable on our end like it was before

i think........right??

GFY is so hard to keep up with anyway ... each day there's 3 or 4 pages of new threads appearing ... the most interesting threads are always bumped to the top anyway, why not leave the def. thread view at 50 ? 100 would load slowly.

49

i'd like 40 per page....

never read 2nd & 3rd page

but
agree 100% :thumbsup

True. I rarely visit page 2 unless it is to see if anyone responded to my post from yesterday.

My 2 cents is that there should be a traffic trading AND gallery submitting forum (both seperate of each other). Although I realize this does not help the overload of posts in the general forum.

Seeing how I am on dialup, 50 is just fine the way it is. Anything more and it will load much slower.

lensman,
it's perfect the way you have it.

Agreed

the way it is works well I think, might of made a great poll.

I like 10...:Graucho

I don't think people tend to click on the 2nd or 3rd pages. But 50 is probably fine, because it shows enough at one time, and it would slow it down if it were larger.

You mean POPULAR threads..

hehehe

it should be 69



:eyecrazy

Well i personaly would like a bit more 70-100 :thumbsup

i like page 3 personally. ;)

i rarely click past page 1

i'd suggest 100-150

I increased it to 60 per page, it increases the page by 15K.

Maybe 75 per page is better?

Yeah, what he said.

I agree with the consensus. 50 is fine. But would be nice to be able to choose for myself whether 50, 100, or even 150 per page...

My :2 cents: anyways.