NATS vs. CCBill vs. Dual vs. MPA3
 

This question is for both affiliates and sponsors alike. But honestly through your experiences and expertise which back end do you prefer? I know this question has come up before and there are certain arguments to be made for each individual platform, but what do you think is best? Please state the facts that you know and why you lean towards whichever platform you support.

NATS

CCBILL

NATS & CCBILL

MPA3


Thanks,

I like CCBILL because as an affiliate, I can promote dozens of programs and get one cheque from them all. That's the biggest reason.

One simple answer. PARTNERSOFT!

agreed its cheaper than nats in the long term and you actually own it outright :thumbsup

right on Shap

I would have thought most people would have liked NATS the most ?

:thumbsup

I have worked with NATS and MPA closely over the years and they are also solid products. These days NATS is the default industry standard , which tells you they have done a tremendous job and have a great product.

How about Paycom + custom stats?

Dude don't give up the secret, :)

Thats like saying microsoft is best OS for your computer because linux and mac are not industry standard. To bad both products blow the doors off microsoft in stability and security 2 things you would want if talking about an affiliate program.

Hackers ALWAYS go after the biggest. If either of those had a larger market share they'd have MUCH more security problems.

Back to the topic:
Affiliate ease of navagating (link codes/galleries/tools):
MPA or CCBill (with that script most are using)

Trust:
CCBill & NATS


CCBill preferred if not alot of traffic/sales is being sent. If alot, it doesnt matter.

There's a few programs that I don't know the backend of, but the stats reporting for some (big programs) is shady and inconsistent. Custom scripts with no accountability can be like that. :winkwink:

All things equal, if the site is hot I don't care what the program uses on the backend, as long as it makes me money.

I need more programs to promote man lol :thumbsup

If that's the script that costs 30k you have little worries about most programs 'jumping' to use it

it only costs 7k actually and it is a really sweet script

Anyone got a link for Partnersoft?

Thanks for your comments everyone, got some things to look into

It is a good piece of software. A lot of differences between it and NATS but a good product.

This is an interesting thread what is the backend of ccbill like in term of usability? I'd be interested I hearing from program owners. When I'm looking for a billing processor, I think about how much I hate having to logging into ccbills interface as a affiliate compared to mpa3 or Nats. Links codes to promote sites are also a nightmare. Does the simplicity of mpa3 or Nats in the end just make life better?