Does she have model / solo site potential?
 

She's 19, open to photos. Help me convince her she should do a solo site.

She has a very petite frame, weighs about 95lbs and is around 5'4.
What do you think? Apologies for the artsy bullshit myspace photo.

http://www.combust.org/model/3.jpg

I'll get more at the test shoot.

Pic doesn't do much justice.

How about asking her if you could take pics of her and show us something worthwhile

What I can see looks great, although this tattoo ruins it a bit.

Yep, I wanted to post this quick - we will be doing a testshoot this week.

I would hit it ....she is sexy

http://www.combust.org/model/2.jpg

Bit better

myspace girls love high contrast... her skin is probably jacked :(

i could be wrong of course

I know her personally, she's a mutual acquaintance. She is very tanned, almost south american looking though she is white.

If her titties, pussy and ass look worth while, she might do well. Hard to tell from these pics though...

Girls next door is a way to go

Best of luck :D

hotttttttttttttttttttttttttt

OMG how would you know homooooooooo

I wasnt talking about her... I meant you are hottttttt sweetie :wetkiss

She looks good as far as I can see the those photos, I would shoot her for our site http://www.dungeoncorp.com/

prollly do well if she does some freaky shit :) i'd shoot her.

Since when are you scouting models and playing photographer?

Hopefully your "friend" is reading this.

Anybody who has to ask if a girl is solo quality has no business trying to put together a solo site. If you don't already know what sells then how in the hell can you expect to produce anything sell-able? Especially when you personally don't know shit about content production.

She's willing to do photos? Oh goodie...That's a start. But what about the fact that personality is the main selling point of a solo site? Personality shines through on video and if she's only willing to do photo then why are you even considering this?

Who's paying for it? Or did you make the old "We can be partners" line?

High contrast or not...The girl looks closer to 29 than 19, particularly in the 2nd pic you posted. I'm not saying she's unattractive, she not....BUT...She is FAR from solo girl material and that tat doesn't help.

id hit it

she might :)

Second pic looks like chasethehottie.

Does she get wet thinking about guys getting their keyboards sticky looking at her? Does she get wet at all? Because frankly, in that one pic, she seems like a snob. But then again I can't really tell...

Amazing since I see the same kinds of posts from others who have a proven track record with solo girls sites!!!!

Try taking a decent picture and come back later when you got it.

She's good looking. be good for a shoot, but not a solo site

Mutt asks all the time and he's forgotten more about successful solo girl sites then you will ever know.

Go back to pretending the world should come to a halt because your dog got bit by another dog, douchebag.

Based on what is already out there....

Scale 1 to 20...

I'd put her on a 19.2 if she stayed active in the sites promotion. As in she'd be the next Raven Riley. From zero to hero in under 4 seconds...

But at 17 or so if she did a site like Teen Topanga... Which still means she would have a very successful and sellable website.

Yo is everything allright bro?

The next Raven Riley? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

The day guys stop trying to convince them to do it is the day we'll start seeing a lot less solo girl sites closing.

Don't convince.

She looks a lot older than 19, my :2 cents:.

Agreed. Would need better pix head to TOES...

:winkwink:

too hard to tell with those photos

First off...Who the fuck are you?

Ah yes....Now I remember.

Moving on.....Mutt does it as advertisement, not because he needs your input. It's called creative spam.

WTF does my dog have to do with anything? Where did I mention anything about that in this thread?

Here's an idea...Crawl back under your dock and STFU, troll. :321GFY

I think biggest difference really is the fact that when Mutt ask's about solo girl material the photo is at least decent LOL!

I am still wondering how the fuck people take bad photos these days.

9 out of 10 Posts asking about solo girl material threads have total shit photos.

You know you're just begging for a good fucking over, later on. :1orglaugh

She looks like someone i know.

shut the fuck up

post better pictures of her.

There's a good chance, but better photos would tell alot more.

I'd certainly mount it.

well since my name's mentioned in here a few times - I do post those threads as subtle advertising/spamming but I do honestly like to hear what people think and there are a few people i look for to see what they say.

but Aaron's right, if you really have to ask if a girl has 'it' or not then she really doesn't have 'it'. i mean a star - not every girl is going to be a star, even some that you think should be - you can still make money with a girl who is a rung below a star.

She looks OK to me...

Egomancer

need better pics of this girl - she's attractive but she's not going to be easy to sell as a 'teen' - i also see a tat on her pelvis - i don't dislike tats but some people seem to be really anal about them.

Take her out to some fast food places, looks like she can use a burger or 6

yah, why not! she's sure hot, man!

I find her very attractive...

who cares about the girl.....BradM I wanna pump your asshole full of cum.

I don't think I'll be taking advice from you any time soon, you laughing stock failure. Go snap some more pics, idiot.

looks very cute!

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

:helpme

You may want to rethink your decision considering that the very person you mentioned above has posted that they agree with me.



But...WTF do I know? I'm a "laughing stock failure." :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh