Greg's Fake Lawsuit part #2
 

"Fris," this will be my final request for you to remove your libelous posts regarding ***************. I sincerely hope you will follow this request to remove any and all of your libelous statements from the GFY board regarding me and my domain name: ***************. Thank you.

Warning!


A civil complaint is about to be filed in the United States District Court for Defamation/Libel against any GFY members who have crossed the line from crazy GFY flaming to outright libel.

Please request to have your libelous posts removed today or risk being included in the law suit.

(It does not cost any extra to add extra defendants to the complaint.)

Remember, this isn't personal. It is a matter of protection from libel.

--

crazy gfy flaming! that legal term is that?

Judge: "Plaintiff's counsel may read the complaint"

Greg's Lawyer: "Ahem.... This civil complaint has been filed in the United States District Court for Defamation/Libel against any GFY members who have crossed the line from crazy GFY flaming to outright libel."

Judge: "Excuse me? What is 'GFY' exactly?"

Greg's lawyer: "Go fuck yourself your honor"



I smell a contempt of court charge a coming.

I believe "Crazy GFY Flaming" is defined under the Internet Crybaby Act of 2003. Fortunately, the U.S. Supreme Court has blocked this act from taking effect, citing, "these little bitches should just grow up" in their ruling.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

freaking lol!

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

So Greg, when is the court date? Please keep us posted, and make sure you spend every fucking minute working on your case. There's no time to sleep or draw comics here, you have a good insane rampage going on so don't lose any steam. Keep on posting! It's becoming very entertaining!

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

cant wait ;)

This is going to get out of hand funny!

I'm waiting?? so far it's only a small tee hee:winkwink:

I asked him to have his lawer contact mine, his response was.

lulz

So *************** doesnt make $10k a year just parked?

OMG please add me to teh cases.

http://mathewingram.com/media/wp-con...12/bribery.jpg

I am available as an expert fake witness for either the defense or prosecution...basically the highest bidder.

Contact me through the Law Offices of Dewey, Cheatum, and Howe...

ADG

no, someone that works at sedo confirmed its not making what he was claiming, so he switched to moniker, and i am sure chris from moniker could verify this also.

hes been trying to sell this domain since 2004.

under 10+ fake nicks.

What an asshole. I was considdering putting in an offer if the stats were true.

1 org laugh

It's unfortunate Franck forced this ruling into effect.

That is Awesome....!!!!!!!!!!!

Talk about a waste of time and energy

oh gee i hate when people dig themselves an 0wnage hole with the lawsuit threat that everybody knows will never happen.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

So everyone can follow along.
Last warnings:

Sounds like you are actually ready for this. Sorry to hear that.

You won't be hearing from my lawyer. I've given you all the warning you'll receive.

Next item you will be receiving will be a copy of the Complaint with your Answer deadline.

Good luck and sorry we were unable to resolve this without legal action.

One final note, removal of libelous posts AFTER the Complaint has been filed will not hault the civil laction. Although the Complaint will be asking for the removal of the posts, there will be other claims that will need to be determined by the court. Your only chance at avoiding the legal proceeding will be to remove libelous posts as requested. Thank you.


-----Original Message-----

Subject: Re: ***SPAM*** Final request to resolve libel issue


I look forward to hearing from your lawyer.

staff members from sedo and moniker will be present to proove its earnings and stats.

please let me know when you have filed, so i can send all the details to my legal staff.

thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: chris <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 2:03 pm
Subject: Re: ***SPAM*** Last e-mail warning re: libel issue


I need to hear from your legal team, no complaint will be valid without legal counsel.

thanks.

-----------------------------------------

I am not trying to tell you your business, but you are mistaken. Not only do I not need to have my attorney contact you in any way before filing a complaint with the Court, but I don?t technically even need an attorney to file a complaint (in any court). I suggest you check with your attorney because I believe you might unknowingly find yourself in a very difficult situation that could have very easily been avoided.

Many law suits have no way to be avoided. Our situation has a very easy way to avoid this law suit, however, that is solely up to you. I really hope you will remove the libelous posts from GFY. Feel free to leave the insults and flames. Those are a normal part of online chat boards, but I simply cannot allow blatant, intentional libelous statements to hang out there on the Internet to harm me and my ability to do business in any way (now or in the future). I don?t particularly want to be involved in a Federal Court Case (believe it or not, I have better things to do), but you have left me no alternative. If you decide not to remove your libelous statements from GFY, my hope is that by filing this law suit, it will serve to correct your defamatory actions, punish you for your defamatory actions and to dissuade others from defaming me or anybody else. I do not WANT to do this, I am forced to do this.

No notice or warning to the Defendant(s) is required before filing a law suit. It is just a prudent for Plaintiffs to take reasonable action to avoid legal action (if possible). It also helps to demonstrate and define Defendant?s actions which may be important to some or all of the claims made in the Complaint. So, my warnings to you served two purposes. First, to help us try to resolve this issue without the need for a legal proceeding and second, to help demonstrate to the court that you were fully knowledgeable about the issues of which are listed in the Complaint.

Finally, the service of the Complaint will be coming to you from the Federal Court Clerk, not me or my attorney.

Defamation is nothing new in the law; the concept has been around in various forms for centuries. Defamation includes both libel, which involves the publishing of false words, and slander, which applies to speech.

Although the exact components of defamation vary according to the laws of different states, a plaintiff must generally show a false statement was published to a third party, causing damage to the plaintiff's reputation or tending to dissuade others from dealing with that person. It doesn't matter exactly which forum the speaker chooses, so any nook of the Internet where a third party can read the statements is good enough.

Moreover, some states consider certain statements to be "defamation per se," which means plaintiffs don't have to prove they actually suffered damage. For example, saying someone is guilty of a crime or incompetent in his or her profession may be assumed by the court to damage that person's reputation.


* Question: What is Malice or "Actual Malice"?

Answer: Malice is often defined as, "the intent, without justification or excuse, to commit a wrongful act." It is the conscious, intentional wrongdoing with the intent of doing harm to do the victim. In many civil cases, a finding that a defendant acted with malice will often open the door to liability or increased damages, such as punitive damages. "Actual malice" is a legal term of art that is mainly relevant to defamation claims. "Actual Malice" is found to be present when a false statement is published with either a) actual knowledge of its falsity or b) reckless disregard for its falsity-- a "should have known" standard.





* The objects of online flames may not take these comments lying down if/when you cross the line to defamation. Today's Internet is a widely read medium, and insinuations found there have a real effect on business and reputations.


* People accused of anonymously posting libelous statements online may find it harder to keep their real-world identities secret following a judge's ruling in a
libel case in Florida.

The judge ruled that an anonymous critic is not entitled to any special privileges that would prevent or delay his unmasking in a lawsuit just because his comments were posted on the Internet.

The United States District Court Clerk requires all filings (other than the original action) to be filed electronically. This will allow both Fris and I (and anyone else who wants in) to easily share all pleadings and rulings in the case as it progresses.

Court actions should be used only as a last resort. Judge's always appreciate the effort to avoid litigation.

The Complaint has, John Doe Defendant aka "Fris" on GFY. To obtain John Doe information I will be subpoenaing (through the Federal Court Clerk) board members, board moderators, server records and other sources (hosting, isp, etc.)to help obtain all true and correct information regarding any/all defendants. All subpoenas should be able to be handled by e-mail or snail mail.

Once confirmed, the John Doe defendants will be replaced with actual names and the case will continue on toward final judgment.

youre a fucking moron... serve him with papers and all he has to do is serve you right back with a vague and ambiguous response, file it with the court and force you to take it to it to court or shut up.

then... your fucked. if he really wanted to be an asshole there are no limit to the moves that can be taken to make it cost you even more time and money to press an issue that is a losing case... and is just going to put you on public record of being an absolute idiot.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh
:1orglaugh
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh


I can't believe this is true.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Greg is befuddled and must have run out of all his junior high insults now that he has to resort to the stupid fake legal threats to prevent people from exposing him.

This guy is a nut case :1orglaugh

Greg,

Make sure you spend all your spare time on this lawsuit. It will not be worth it in the end for you, but it's certainly going to provide great entertainment for the board members:1orglaugh

Fuck off!

:1orglaugh

i think the domain is worthless and I think he is asking way too much.

and thats not libel.

But on Planet Crazy it's worth 6 figures.

finally his domain thread was moved to buy and sell

Perfectly correct that your post is not libel. The fact nobody cares what you think is also perfectly correct.:thumbsup

It appears that you might be the only person understanding the definition of libel and defamation. Others will soon understand.

domain is worthless, fake stats, 100 fake nicks.

This is not a threat. I was offering Fris and others a way out so that the Judge can ask, why they didn't take it.

Exposing me ? What exactly do you mean, "prevent people from exposing me?"

O god, I want in on this. Fris, what do I have to post to get co-defendant status ? I haven't been to Internet Court in so long dammit.

You are a fucking moron . . . if his answer is vague and ambiguous then he will lose on our motion for summary judgment which will be filed as soon as he files his answer.
No matter what he says in his answer we will be requesting Summary Judgment. There is NOTHING he can say in his answer to defend his posts. NOTHING! He has no defense and this will be the shortest case he is ever involved in. Hopefully it will also be an expensive lesson for him. The judgment against the defendants might mean that they will be working for me for a year or two (or more) depending on how much they earn annually.

There will be no cost for me to proceed to court (except filing fees which are minimal). Losing case? YOU ARE DEAD WRONG MORON! YOU ARE ON RECORD AS BEING AN ABSOLUTE IDIOT! Thanks for giving your worthless opinion and guiding the defendants with your brilliant opinion.

This isn't "internet court" this is the United States District Court which can have jurisdiction over internet cases of libel. All you need to do is defame me and you can be a co-defendant.

Remember, it doesn't cost me anything extra to add defendants. So, step right up.


It takes mere seconds for the secretary to add your name to page one of the Complaint and put you at risk for a huge damage award. Just ask any attorney or do a bit of research. I don't know why I even bother trying to warn you about how serious defamation is.

Do whatever you want - and you will get what you deserve.

you really need to goto law school, you have zero clue. pick up a book sometime, and stop trying to sell your shitty worthless domain like you have for the past 3 years, if you are hosting your images on geocities, it really shows something, and can you even afford a lawyer?

Just file the pretend lawsuit already. Why would you spend days sitting on a board talking about it instead of doing it?

so broke he uses geoshities for hosting, lulz

Now that is funny! I'll have to tell my attorney to be careful how he answers that question.


Federal Court Judges and Magistrate Judges deal with dirty words and dirty images and Federal Criminal Defendants all the time. They are all big boys. Believe me, bad words will not offend or bother them.

whats taking so long? file the lawsuit already you stupid fuck

You are funny. You will be quite surprised very soon. Remember, I have said many times that I will not have to pay an attorney to represent me.

Any way, all attorney fees and Court costs will be coming out of the judgment against you. Even if I lose (which I have been assured is impossible) it will not cost me anything (except Court costs).

lols, someone assuring you a win, this is even more funny. so tell me when you have filed.

Because I was trying to avoid having to take legal action against Fris and friends.

I don't want to take them to court, I am forced to do it.


Plus, the Judge will see how I requested time and time again for the defamation posts to be removed and my pleas went ignored and or mocked by the Defendants. This is sure to increase the damages award.



Malice is often defined as, "the intent, without justification or excuse, to commit a wrongful act." It is the conscious, intentional wrongdoing with the intent of doing harm to do the victim. In many civil cases, a finding that a defendant acted with malice will often open the door to liability or increased damages, such as punitive damages."