What Is Our Fucking World Coming To?
 

I don't personally care how old she may have looked, this is simply fucked up ...

:2 cents:

Girl provoked pedophile - judge
From correspondents in London
June 26, 2007 12:00am

- 10-year-old girl was raped and assaulted
- Judge says victim 'dressed provocatively'
- Pedophile will be free in just four months

A PEDOPHILE who raped a 10-year-old girl will be free in just four months after a British judge said his victim had "dressed provocatively".

Window cleaner Keith Fenn, 24, could have been jailed for life after twice attacking the girl in a riverside park.

Judge Julian Hall was at the centre of a storm over the "pathetic" sentence he imposed after hearing the girl had appeared much older than her age.

The same judge caused uproar earlier this year by setting free another paedophile and telling him to give his victim money "to buy a nice new bicycle".

In the latest case, Oxford Crown Court heard harrowing details of the assault on the 10-year-old. She was attacked in a park in South Oxfordshire by Fenn and his accomplice Darren Wright, 34, on October 14 last year.

Fenn removed all her clothes and raped her, then Wright took her to his home and sexually assaulted her.

Yet Judge Hall said the case was exceptional because the "young woman" had been wearing a frilly bra and thong.

The girl has been in local authority care since the age of four.

She was on her own when she met the pair in the street. They went to the park together. The judge said he faced a moral dilemma.

The court heard that the girl regularly wore make-up, strappy tops and jeans.

"It is quite clear she is a very disturbed child and a very needy child and she is a sexually precocious child. She liked to dress provocatively," the judge said.

"Did she look like she was 10? Certainly not. She looked 16."

He gave Fenn concurrent two-year and 18-month sentences but he will be free in just weeks after spending eight months in jail awaiting sentence.

Wright is a free man because he too had served eight months on remand.

Yesterday Dr Michele Elliott, of Kidscape, said: "This is beyond pathetic, it is utterly derisory. For the judge to say that the way she was dressed in any way excuses a 24-year-old man having sex with her is disgraceful and ridiculous."

Fenn admitted two counts of rape of a child under 13 and Wright admitted one charge of causing or inciting sexual activity with a child aged under 13.

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,21969117-2,00.html

:mad:

I just read that, the judge needs to be investigated for pedo'ism.

strange things going on

I read that this morning, that judge needs to be shot in the face,

Something's not exactly right here.

Disbar the idiot judge, and the girls family needs to get some vigilantly justice and should throw a serious beating on the pedo.

Hey, where do you think porn stars come from?

All I can say is WTF???

Too fucked up man,the judge should serve time

that makes no sense. :(

It's fucked up.. but so is a society where a 10 year old wears a thong and a frilly bra and make up. My sister in law recently banned tv and started buying a lot more children's dvd's to replace it after her 3 year old said "bratz" the other day in recognition of an ad and I don't disagree.

Wtf...............

Wtf!!!!!!!!!!!!

crazy brits..

damn... that's fucked up....

Not that I am a spelling nazi on boards, but I'm guessing this was not a type and you would appreciate knowing the correct spelling. it is vigilante.

Seems like a miscarriage of justice.

It's a sick world were living in.

Where are those Icelandic Feminists when we need em?!

not that I agree with what this guy did, or the judges decision... but that girl should not be dressing like that at 10. I mean really. She was in local authority care since the age of 4.... WTF is wrong with these care givers?

fucking terrible on all counts ctb.

she was asking for it

OK...even if she looked like she was 30, shouldn't they be prosecuted for fucking RAPING her??

I'd say serves her right and wrongly but since she has no parents... That sucks.

what it doesn't say here is that she willingly fucked him.

It was "rape" in the legal definition, but guaranteed she more than willingly sucked and fucked him.

Yeah about how sick this world is?

I don't know, maybe you ask YOUR kid what they're schedule of the day is.

1. Spend to much time behind the internet, with the logical consequence of kids, PIMPING they're myspace, putting their myspace on the WHORETRAIN, while they'r RIPPING a cd.

Way to go!

Don't get me fucking started

Without calling any names, some people made some fucked up remarks on this post also.. Hawkeye

I been in this industry for 7 years (not that long) but there needs to be a mutual respect. Choose yer timing. That shit is wrong

How fucked up is that!???!?!??!

can somebody dress that judge in a miniskirt and hold him down for me

Agreed

Oh yeah, and struck the fuck off.

that was really fucking shit...now we're all confused who needs to have justice the rapist?...or the victim....or the judge?...

Send him on a hunting trip with Dick Cheney.

Really insane judgement..

That is just wrong. A person's dress does not automatically give the ok to be sexually attacked and assaulted. I can walk down any street in Manhattan and see many hot women dressed to kill and I guess what? I never think now I have to rape and assault her.

my thoughts exactly

the judge is obviously off his fucking rocker, but in a skewed odd little way he does have a somewhat valid point. people need to quit dressing their pre-pubescent daughters like a bunch of little whores. no 10 year old girl needs skintight lowrider jeans, tube tops, and a thongs wedged up their asscracks, that is for sure. hell, no 13 year old girl needs to be whoring herself up half as much as the majority do these days. little girls certainly need better idols than the paris hiltons, britney spears, and lindsey lohans they have now. but that beign said, it is NO REASON WHATSOEVER to let some pederass off lightly...

people could allow their 10yo daughters to walk around in only a pair of crotchless panties and I wouldn't drag them into the park and rape them.

People who are going to sexually assualt children aren't doing it because the child is dressed a certain way (that's the excuse if they get caught) ... they are doing it because they like to sexually assualt children.

are you fucking kidding me?

Leaving your house unlocked doesn't make any breaking or entering into your house OK, but you'd be a fool to think you're not increasing the risk of it happening.

I definitely have to agree with that...

Damn Fucking Right. You either have reason and accountibility or you don't.:error

10y.o. ??

I think a shot in de face is mild!:ak47: A few at least!

Wow.. I'm amazed by this... That judge should be investigated now..

i agree, his language was the biggest giveaway to me, it is one thing that should be ringing alarm bells for everyone.:mad:

That's bullshit. The only reason he knew she was wearing a frilly bra and thong is because they fucken undressed her! So blaming it on the underwear is bullshit on top of being irrelevant to rape.

the judge has been jerking off to too much interweb porn, 10 year old sluts gone wild or something.
kid needs her ass smacked.
chester the molester needs to go to prison, the boys in the yard will show him some special love.

That judge obviously has some kind of childhood anger issues himself. Maybe someone touched his peepee when he was young?

What some ignorant people are just not aware of is that when a man rapes a woman or girl for that matter, it's not about sex or anything like that. It's about power.

indeed, very fucked

don't put words into my mouth. i didn't say anything of the sort. i stated that parents shouldn't be allowing their daughters to dress like a bunch of little whored up tramps, not that it's a justifiable excuse for pedophilia or rape, or that it turns otherwise normal individuals into crazed kiddie rapists...

addiotnally i'd like to state that this guy deserves the fullest punishment the law can throw at him, and the judge should absolutely be in question for making such a decision. he did in my opinion make an offbeat, but valid point, but i don't think this was the time nor place to bring it up. i was just pointing out that, YES, there are in fact a lot of whored up little girls running around, and that in itself falls under the "what is our fucking world coming to?" heading. in no way should this opinion have had an influence over the sentencing in the way he let it. something obviously is clouding his methods of reason, which should at least raise some questions within the community. especially being as this isn't the first questionable ruling he's made...

yep it does sounds like the judge is a Pedophile

that judge is insane...