Pay Per Signup or Revshare
 

Which is the best way to go in general.

I understand there are many variables involved in this question.

Would it be a wise choice to take your money and run in a failing economy?

Or do you think revshare and hoping for a member to recur is the best bet?

Please do not spam this thread.

I prefer PPS for a few reasons.

1. I don't have to worry about a sponsor going under and not paying rebills
2. You can judge ROI on your exposure easier.

Having said that I work on rev share with a select group of sponsors and I love the rebills on slow days.

My advice would be use a good mix of the 2 with more going to PPS.

I agree with Brad regarding a good mix of both. Speaking as TGP/MGP owners here, we do both. When sponsors/sales slowed down a bit in May, those rebills helped when overall ratios were down. Looking at May stats in Stats Remote, if we were only using $35pps, we would have made apx. $2000 less compared to April based on the # of sales and ratios. But because we had alot of rebill increases, we actually made a little more than we did in April, even though our May ratios were apx. 1:400 worse.

:2 cents:

Too many variables chief. But I'll put it simply..

For programs that I know first hand, I prefer revenue share on the good one's I know retain.

For unknowns, or untested, I pick the other (PPS).

:2 cents:

I prefer PPS