![]() |
Women with Tats vs. No Tats
What do you prefer? Personally I like a woman without em'
|
Either none or a bunch... Not a fan of one or two... :pimp
|
Without is definitely my preference. Especially those cheap light blue ink ones that look like they were done by a friend of theirs..
|
As long as its done with taste and class i dont mind it on any girl.. although im somtimes in the mood for the dark gothic type then even if the are covered with them i dont mind it
|
I love em. It usually means we speak the same language.
|
It's very rare when a chick looks good with tats.
|
I prefer without them :thumbsup
|
Quote:
|
Tats are a huge turn off
|
without, definitely (y)
|
Yeah without. A chick with tats seems dirty to me...dont know why
|
WITHOUT !!!!!!
I fucking hate them..... :disgust |
All depends on the tattoo...Some can be sexy and I've seen some trashy one's.
Also depends on the woman... |
Quote:
|
without them.
|
Without is preference- I mostly don't like the ones that put their name there so you don't forget who they are.
|
I can't wait to see all these chicks that have them nowadays when they are 65 years old, with some dumb ass tatoo on their old wrinkly body...
|
|
None!!!!
|
it definitly all depends... some retarded looking tribal tramp stamp is not my style.. shit i dont like any tribal tats. the older style chick tats i like.. butterfly on the ankel or by the waist line.. gay shit like that i think looks much better than some retarded looking thing like on the back of krystal steal's back.. ew
|
I don't really care if they have tats or not, so long as they're cute. Really good, well-placed art on a gal can be a big turnon... but a stupid tattoo on anybody looks... well, stupid. :-)
|
I like them both,if the girl does it for me it doesnt matter.
|
I like them without myself. They just dont look right to me on a women
|
Without. Some girls look really great with tats, but unfortunately very few tattoo "artists" do a good job. It has to fit the look and personality.
|
i prefer without tats
|
Quote:
not my opinion, societal opinion. regardless of what folks say in the microcosm of GFY, in modern western society you will see a paucity of visible tattoos in academia, corporate boardrooms, or on the trophy wives of men who have made it into the upper social strata. just about the dumbest thing a young female can do is make a trip to the tattoo parlor, especially if she is already beautiful. |
Without. Really takes away from a woman attractiveness. If wanted to fuck someone with tatoos I'd fuck a pirate.
Also I do not get why women still get tramp stamps. Surely by now every chick knows what a tramp stamp and and still woman think to themselves "I want to put something permanent on my body that tells the whole world that I'm a slut that fucks many anonymous guys without comdoms." |
depends on who the tattoo is on
|
<sniffle> well I guess nobody will like me cause I have a few (all that can be covered up by clothing or uncovered at my discretion .
Oh well.. PK |
I'd hit both. Which one you got?
|
A little one is cool but no tats
|
tats suck!
|
Quote:
I think they are OK, but tats alone is not a turn on, more like, something that you can overlook. The only problem with them is, it's supposed to an expression of self determination, and individuality, but there is really nothing original about them at all. Every woman over the age of 18 (Many times younger) has a tramp stamp now...it's just old. Every time I see a chick with a lot of tats, a sleeve, or a full back, the first thing I think is, "Man I don't want to be around when she is 40. She is going to be pissed that she did that" *Yawn* It's kind of like looking at a Zebra in a top hat, you have to look because they have made such an effort to be looked at. Too much vanity, and attention getting involved. |
I dont have any "tats" but I am a tattood woman and very proud of it
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:03 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123