Scientists might have cured cancer and no one gives a fuck?
 

http://www.studentprintz.com/home/in...d-b529895da103

I posted about this before and the gfy braintrust is right on the money--there's no interest in a cure for cancer cuz pharma corps won't make money on that stuff. The big money is in chemotherapy drugs etc etc.

Duh, why do you think corporations are suppressing free-energy technologies? You really think they are ready for enormous industries like oil and electricity to become obsolete? Don't think so...

Drug companies are major advetisers on all news stations, right? Im just assuming, I really have never paid any attention so if they fucked with them they would loose out on all that ad money.

Of course, they're interested in life-long medications. There's no interest by the pharmaceuticals to make a cure, its a one-time payment. Long-term income is where the money is.
WG

The companies refuse to go the PPS option as they know the revshare in this case will rebill for years.

I'd hit it

Further proof of how fucking bent and primitive the human race still is :(

there has never been money in the cure

I concur... Same with gasoline etc. we could be living on bio-diesel, or ethanol, hell if we wanted to every car would be electric..... but im sure that would pose more problems with hydro.

We have technology far more advanced than all that bullshit you just mentioned...

How true!:pimp

Are you talking about HEMP? If not, share the links, playa. I'd like to learn new stuff daily.

Google news doesn't have much to say about it :(

Agreed. Which makes this thread: http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=735267 all the more tragic. :(

But most of these technologies would most likely be to much money to impliment on a large scale production.

My sister in Laws mom is going to die of cancer in the next few months. So sad that they dont want to cure it, just treat it.

To add balance to the discussion (since skepticism is always good to have in tempering a discussion) check out: http://www.cancer.org/aspx/blog/Comments.aspx?id=130

Good analysis re side effects of DCA http://www.lewrockwell.com/sardi/sardi68.html

Read People http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dichloroacetic_acid

An alternative chemical that can reprogram cancer cells to DIE:

Anyway, you’ve learned more about DCA than you care to, or need to, know. That’s because there is another small molecule that deserves more attention. Like DCA, it is a small molecule that can enter the cell nucleus and switch genes on or off. It is perceived by the body as a toxin, but actually is non-toxic, and it is very stealth, it can penetrate any resistant cancer cell. It works in a similar manner to DCA by inducing cancer cell death (apoptosis). The molecule is resveratrol, known as a red wine molecule. Resveratrol appears to kill off cancer cells by depolarizing (demagnetizing) mitochondrial bodies within tumor cells.

Resveratrol is 100 anti-cancer drugs in one. Resveratrol works in so many ways to block cancer, researchers can’t find a cancer-promotion pathway it doesn’t inhibit. It is virtually non-toxic since, after oral ingestion, it is quickly metabolized by the liver, attached to a detoxification molecule called glucuronate, which renders it harmless, though biologically inactive, at least for a time.

At the site of tumors cells there is an unzipping enzyme (glucuronidase) that uncouples resveratrol from glucuronate. This is nature’s "drug delivery system," releasing resveratrol at the right time and place. This explains resveratrol’s stealthiness. [Cancer Letters 231: 113–22, 2006; Oncogene 23: 6702–11, 2004; Toxicology Letters 161: 1–9, 2006; World Journal Gastroenterology 12: 5628–34, 2006; Investigative Ophthalmology Visual Science 47: 3708–16, 2006; Cancer Detection Prevention 30: 217-23, 2006; Molecular Cancer Therapy 4: 554–61, 2005; Journal Biological Chemistry 278: 41482–90, 2003]

There are currently two human resveratrol/cancer trials underway, one for cancer prevention at the University of Leicester, and one for colon cancer at the University of California, Irvine. Both trials have passed the safety arm, meaning no overt toxicity. Cancer patients await the completion of these studies.

Source: http://www.lewrockwell.com/sardi/sardi68.html

Caveat: The writer has a vested interest in resveratrol pills but it's definitely a good place for further research, vested interest notwithstanding.

My father-in-law is going down that same road now :(

its all the politician's fault

you guys think they are just tied into oil and wars? just wait and see

There have been a lot of drugs that have had similar effects on animals\cultures. Until it moves further along this is just your bi-annual "ZMG ANOTHER CURE FOR CANCER" drug that doesn't actually work\isn't safe once testing moves further along.

In any event this drug is fairly old news.

Wouldn't that make her your mother in law? Maybe i'm just not thinking straight this time of night...

exactly my thoughts

Just found out my uncle has lymphoma, all this fucking greed is destroying our society :(

Good point. Unless i've got it wrong too...

If the politicians are aware of a cure, wouldn't they cure themselves? Surely some important politicians have died in cancer. Or some extremely wealthy, etc..

it will always be this way