![]() |
How To break apart a Raid Setup? HELP!
Hello everyone...
We have a hi-end Dell editing station that is 1 gig and set up as a Raid 5. Is there an easy/efficient way to break-apart the Raid and just use the system as 4 individual hard-drives? Each at 250 gig per? The Raid 5 is just slowing the system down really badly. Any help is greatly appreciated... And Kind Regards... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Can I change it over to a Raid 0?
for speed? Would this be easy to do? Is Raid 0 truly reliable? Thanks |
{{{day time bump}}}
Anyone? |
short anwser: no
long answes: you'll lose all data when you change the raid type :) best way: backup the data.. break the raid.. setup as 4 seperate drives.. restore data |
Understood.
With that said... Do you have any tips or ideas on how to make this Raid 5 work faster? It seems like things come up slow and the hard-drives are always working. This is a Dual Xeon 3.4 gig 2 gig rams 1 terrabyte raid 5 (4 250's) Please advise on any suggestions THANKS! |
--anyone---anyone---... ?
|
RAID0 isn't reliable at all because there's no redundancy... a single failure will render the array unusable. If it's just used as capture+scratch space then this isn't such an issue, although the PC will not be able to boot with a failed array.
If it's used for transient data then perhaps consider the OS+perm data on a single drive, then a 3 drive RAID0 array. BTW, 4 x 250GB on RAID5 is actually 750GB useable... you lose 250Gb to redundancy parity. |
Oh yeah, is it software RAID? That could explain why it's slow... the parity calculations for every byte of data written are done by the PC CPU rather than a dedicated chip on the RAID card.
|
Rowan,
thanks for the reply... It is a dedicated Raid card.... on a Dell Precision Workstation 670. |
Have you tried defragging? Even a RAID will need to do that. I'm using RAID 1 and have never had any trouble with the speed. If you have the funding, you could always go to 10K raptor drives. Still, try the defrag if you haven't already.
|
Quote:
|
The RAID card is an Adaptec CERC SATA1.5/6ch
Is that a good one? |
If your problem is speed I would recommend a RAID 10 but you would need more hard drives and to copy all the data off your current RAID 5 to do that. I would imagine that you probably need a new raid controller, something with a cache and processor on it. http://www.newegg.com
Brad |
RAID 0 is a recipe for disaster. If you have 4 drives in RAID0 you are four times as likely to lose your data than if you use a single drive.
RAID1 (mirroring) is the fastest option, if you have four drives then RAID 10 is the fastest and safest. - you do lose half the capacity of the drives though. |
Quote:
There's nothing absolutely horrible about software RAID... it's just not as fast as doing it in hardware, and it may not be supported by alternative operating systems. I have an Intel software SATA1 RAID setup (1+0) under XP SP2 which has an average read speed of 150MB+/sec. As darling2 suggested, RAID10 (aka RAID 1+0) will probably give you the best performance overall as it is both striped (faster) and mirrored (redundant). The downside is that out of 4 x 250GB drives the array capacity will only be 500GB (half of the total). The next best would probably be RAID5. RAID0 is not redundant at all. |
The CERC Raid card is a hardware Raid-5 card with 6 channels. There should be a web based app that you use to manage the card and to run diagnostics.
Things to check for performance issues.
The way the CERC works is that it creates a virtual pool of space that is composed of whatever space from the multiple drives that you assign. When you set up a drive letter you are actually creating a virtual drive that is carved out of the pool. David. |
raid 5 blows i hate it
i just mirror with hotswap spares ready to go |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:08 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123