GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   lensman - are you going to sue these suckers? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=72414)

lawpal 08-16-2002 07:54 AM

lensman - are you going to sue these suckers?
 
I saw this ad on Yahoo, and decided to check it out.


http://www.internetwasher.com/


This shit looks a lot like InternetEraser. The pop-up ads which they use, combined with the domain name, their marketing, and the layout of their site and advertising, combine to create confusing similarities which will end up resulting in your losing customers and money.

You should speak to your lawyer and ask him to evaluate this matter to determine if you have a defendable "tradedress" issue under the Lanham Act based upon their actions and the confusing similarties that exist.

He should know exactly what I am talking about.

Peace
LawPal


:321GFY

ControlThy 08-16-2002 08:00 AM

Are you talking about:

http://www.interneteraser.com

and

http://www.internetwash.com

?

Don't look similair to me, please elaborate.

.:Frog:. 08-16-2002 08:00 AM

These sites look as different as black & white to me.
Did you post the correct urls?

Sex4it 08-16-2002 08:03 AM

I see no problem

lawpal 08-16-2002 08:35 AM

I see several problems

Internet eraser has, under the Lahnam act, an argument that it owns a "tradedress", which essentially means that it can make a claim against someone trying to steal money by creating a confusingly similar product, which they market and sell in a manner which might confuse consumers.


I think the problems are

confusingly similar domain names

confusingly similar advertising

confusingly similar pop-up ads

risk of consumer confusion

if someone buys internetwasher that reduces the potential consumer base for internet eraser, and is essentially stealing customers based on the use of the internet eraser tradedress, and the risk of diluting the market can constitute damages.

Here is the applicable statute:

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/15/1125.html


At the minimum I would send them a cease and desist letter, and if that did not work I would consider suing them in federal court.

DrewKole 08-16-2002 08:39 AM

and here I was, thinking that lensman created the first ever internet "cleaning" program?

no case, move on, there's nothing at all to see here. =)

DarkJedi 08-16-2002 08:39 AM

wake the hell up

ControlThy 08-16-2002 08:41 AM

Lawpal,

I think you are overreacting a bit.
There are hundreds if not thousands of products being sold everyday that are in some way similair to their counterparts.

Maybe this is "confusing" for you, but I am sure a judge will see it all clearly.

lawpal 08-16-2002 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by ControlThy
Lawpal,

I think you are overreacting a bit.
There are hundreds if not thousands of products being sold everyday that are in some way similair to their counterparts.

Maybe this is "confusing" for you, but I am sure a judge will see it all clearly.

I don't think I overreacted at all.

I just posted the topic for conversation because I assumed that a majority of the webmasters who visit this board promote internet eraser, and would want their sponsor to defend the product they are promoting from potential dilution.

I leave it to lensman to decide whether he wants to address the issue.

seven 08-16-2002 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by lawpal
confusingly similar domain names

confusingly similar advertising

confusingly similar pop-up ads

risk of consumer confusion

I hope no-one trademarked the word "Internet" and "eraser" and "washer" are distinctly different words to me.

Confusingly similar product? Duh! You'll have to sue thousands of companies for bringing out confusingly similar products everyday.

Similar pop-up ads? duh!
Risk of consumer confusion? duh!

RATBOY 08-16-2002 09:01 AM

Ummm, I think there is no case here. He may get a settlement, but it would hardly cover the lawyers fees. However the long term benefits may be payoff enough (if he wins a lawsuit).

DarkestWeb 08-16-2002 09:06 AM

I may be completely off base here but I think that Internet Eraser is a bland product that you can have the "actual" developers mark with your name etc. You pay them a bit of money and they make the program "YourEraserProgram" . I'm not sure if this is the same thing Lens is doing but I know there is a company that does this.

MoTives

.:Frog:. 08-18-2002 12:49 AM

Lawpal are you for real?

Pornwolf 08-18-2002 12:54 AM

Thanks guys! Now I see it's safe for me to register http://internet-e-raser.com/

chodadog 08-18-2002 01:12 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by lawpal
Internet eraser has, under the Lahnam act, an argument that it owns a "tradedress", which essentially means that it can make a claim against someone trying to steal money by creating a confusingly similar product, which they market and sell in a manner which might confuse consumers.
Your name isn't very becoming of you. I'd expect someone named "<i>law</i>pal" to have a better idea about this. Going by your interpretation of "tradedress", the original teen paysite could sue every other teensite for creating a "confusingly" similar product?

They're all naked chicks, that are teens. SUE DAMMIT, SUE!!

You seem to misunderstand the statute!

"is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive as to the affiliation, connection, or association of such person with another person, or as to the origin, sponsorship, or approval of his or her goods, services, or commercial activities by another person"

Simply put, would a reasonable person be deceived into thinking internet washer and internet eraser are the same product?
I don't think so.

Obviously, someone will realise that they will essentially do the same thing. Hell, i'm pretty sure Heinz Baked Beans are essentially the same as Golden Circle Baked Beans too! Should they sue?

"false designation of origin + false or misleading description of fact"

Please point out where this occurs.

Fletch XXX 08-18-2002 01:16 AM

not deceiving enough.

:glugglug

Joe Sixpack 08-18-2002 01:17 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by chodadog
Hell, i'm pretty sure Heinz Baked Beans are essentially the same as Golden Circle Baked Beans too! Should they sue?

Another Queenslander.

LiveDose 08-18-2002 01:57 AM

Oh, good. After reading this post I just remembered why most lawyers make me sick...


Thank you.

Pathfinder 08-18-2002 02:38 AM

Lawpal:

This is a good opportunity to practice defense.

Paul Markham 08-18-2002 02:54 AM

Big time Internet pornographer goes to court to defend his product that wipes porno off a computer. On a very shakey case. Hmmmmm

Lawpal remind me to come take a holiday where you live. Me I live in the real world but have always wanted to go to Dreamland. Now I have an reason, to come and talk some sense into you.

Or was this just a bit of Kiss ass?

chodadog 08-18-2002 03:11 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Joe Sixpack


Another Queenslander.

:winkwink:

greentea 08-18-2002 04:42 AM

Lawpal how many times did you fail the bar exam?

FATPad 08-18-2002 04:58 AM

You must be kidding me...

I'm really starting to think it might be time to kill all the lawyers.

.:Frog:. 08-18-2002 05:11 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by greentea
Lawpal how many times did you fail the bar exam?
I doubt he has even taken the bar exam. j/k

Paul Markham 08-18-2002 05:44 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by greentea
Lawpal how many times did you fail the bar exam?
Every time the barman says "Can you afford that sir" he examines his purse and fails to find any money.

Lawpal, you know so much about the law? Go do what APIC are trying to do, but do it nicely.

EscortBiz 08-18-2002 05:59 AM

lol true

lawpal 08-18-2002 07:18 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by greentea
Lawpal how many times did you fail the bar exam?
took it once, passed it the first time

thanks for asking

TheBigGuy 08-18-2002 07:57 AM

Damn, tough crowd!

Lensman 08-18-2002 08:40 AM

Lawpal has some excellent points, we ran across another one that was even worse the other day, they had even stolen some of our graphics.

I'm on the road right now, but when I get back at the office I should have you take a run at them.

HQ 08-18-2002 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Lensman
Lawpal has some excellent points, we ran across another one that was even worse the other day, they had even stolen some of our graphics.

I'm on the road right now, but when I get back at the office I should have you take a run at them.

Yeah I saw that one too, I can't remember the url now though. I just thought it was your site. It looked exactly the same.

Altima 08-18-2002 10:49 AM

anyone who has a paysite should sue everyone else who does.
come on give me a break.:321GFY

sexygoat 08-18-2002 11:10 AM

what an ass kisser, mind your own biz dude !

Matt 26z 08-18-2002 03:54 PM

I could see going after someone for stealing advertising material and using it as their own, but not because they have a similar program. That wouldn't hold up in court. There are MANY "internet eraser" type programs. Evidence Eliminator being the most well known. There are also many free programs that do this same stuff.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123