AVN Online News: Pryor, Baucus Introduce News: Adult-Site Corral Bill

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • C H R I S
    Too lazy to set a custom title
    • Nov 2005
    • 10842

    #1

    AVN Online News: Pryor, Baucus Introduce News: Adult-Site Corral Bill

    WASHINGTON - Sens. Max Baucus (D-Mont.) and Mark Pryor (D-Ark.) on Wednesday introduced a new bill aimed at curtailing minors' access to sexually explicit content online.

    The Cyber Safety for Kids Act of 2007 would require all adult websites to incorporate secure login mechanisms that include age verification, "clean" homepages, and some sort of electronic flag to facilitate filtering. The U.S. Department of Commerce's National Telecommunication & Information Administration would oversee enforcement of the act, and failure to comply could be punished by fines or the removal of offending websites from cyberspace.

    FULL STORY
    C H R I S
    Retired Porn Veteran

    BH4L
  • dynastoned
    mmm yeah!
    • Feb 2005
    • 5061

    #2
    here we go again..... its never ending with these fucking assholes.

    Comment

    • BoyAlley
      So Fucking Gay
      • Nov 2004
      • 19714

      #3
      God damn they just don't fucking let up do they.

      "Removal of Sites from CyberSpace". Welcome to Nazi Germany!

      BTW: Didn't this whole mess just get thrown out like, a month ago when the judge finally ruled on COPA?

      This sounds like COPA all over again?

      Comment

      • BoyAlley
        So Fucking Gay
        • Nov 2004
        • 19714

        #4
        "I wish the solution to protecting kids on the Internet was as easy as shutting every one of these [sexually explicit] sites down, but it's not," Pryor said in a prepared statement.
        Yeah, that pesky little detail called the "US Constitution" keeps getting in the way.

        Stupid jackasses.

        "many of them aggressively target children as their audience," according to the prepared statement.
        Of course they need to blatantly lie to try and get their point across.

        Last edited by BoyAlley; 04-12-2007, 03:45 PM.

        Comment

        • jact
          Confirmed User
          • Sep 2002
          • 9134

          #5
          We have more enemies then friends, it's in our best interests to remember that.
          Free agent

          Comment

          • tony299
            lurker
            • Aug 2002
            • 57021

            #6
            Dont these idiots realize the net is not just the usa?

            Comment

            • After Shock Media
              It's coming look busy
              • Mar 2001
              • 35299

              #7
              Originally posted by tony404
              Dont these idiots realize the net is not just the usa?
              I live in the USA, you live in the USA by your location. Does it really matter to you or me that they forget that? It still would effect us regardless.

              Yes parts of it look very much like COPA with a few twists though the age verification part will mess it up again.

              [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

              Comment

              • tony299
                lurker
                • Aug 2002
                • 57021

                #8
                Originally posted by After Shock Media
                I live in the USA, you live in the USA by your location. Does it really matter to you or me that they forget that? It still would effect us regardless.

                Yes parts of it look very much like COPA with a few twists though the age verification part will mess it up again.
                my point is they are going to stop nothing , 40 percent of net porn is offshore

                Comment

                • Boobmeister
                  Confirmed User
                  • Feb 2007
                  • 105

                  #9
                  Those 2 bozos tried a similar bill in 2006. Now that their party controls Congress, it looks like their going to succeed this year.

                  Comment

                  • tony299
                    lurker
                    • Aug 2002
                    • 57021

                    #10
                    Originally posted by BoyAlley


                    Yeah, that pesky little detail called the "US Constitution" keeps getting in the way.

                    Stupid jackasses.



                    Of course they need to blatantly lie to try and get their point across.

                    i hope the fsc releases a statement , no porner wants to entice kids thats bullshit

                    Comment

                    • XPays
                      Team Player
                      • May 2004
                      • 13002

                      #11
                      initially at least the bill seems to be in conflict with visa reg's re: age verification
                      InterNext Expo Domain Auction Live Now thru Feb 5
                      HuntingMoon GFY Domains Marketplace is LIVE
                      XPays always pays! Top Site: * RealJasmine.com * + HotelHeiressĀ® with The Paris Hilton Sex Video
                      Insert the HotelHeiressĀ® HD FEED into your members areas
                      XPin.com Opening for Pin Partners Soonish
                      Mainstream Offers For Emailers and DomainersNONADULT.COM


                      Like Us!

                      Comment

                      • GatorB
                        The Demon & 12clicks
                        • Oct 2001
                        • 18208

                        #12
                        Originally posted by AVNChris
                        WASHINGTON - Sens. Max Baucus (D-Mont.) and Mark Pryor (D-Ark.) on Wednesday introduced a new bill aimed at curtailing minors' access to sexually explicit content online.

                        The Cyber Safety for Kids Act of 2007 would require all adult websites to incorporate secure login mechanisms that include age verification, "clean" homepages, and some sort of electronic flag to facilitate filtering. The U.S. Department of Commerce's National Telecommunication & Information Administration would oversee enforcement of the act, and failure to comply could be punished by fines or the removal of offending websites from cyberspace.

                        FULL STORY
                        This looks just like COPA and that couldn't pass muster with the courts.

                        Do these idiots know anything about the internet? How do they propose a non-US site hosted on non-US servers that violates this law be removed?

                        Comment

                        • C H R I S
                          Too lazy to set a custom title
                          • Nov 2005
                          • 10842

                          #13
                          Originally posted by jact
                          We have more enemies then friends, it's in our best interests to remember that.
                          Very True...
                          C H R I S
                          Retired Porn Veteran

                          BH4L

                          Comment

                          • tony299
                            lurker
                            • Aug 2002
                            • 57021

                            #14
                            "many of them aggressively target children as their audience," according to the prepared statement.

                            The industry really has to put up money to kill this myth once and for all.Its very dangerous to us

                            Comment

                            Working...