GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Why hasn't teen revenue started a teen boy gay solo site? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=722936)

Quick Buck 04-10-2007 02:38 PM

Why hasn't teen revenue started a teen boy gay solo site?
 
I'm sure there is a big demand out ther for 18 year old boys who look 13 blowing older men.

I guess I just dont understand why they only cater to straight predators?

Not starting shit here, legitimate question.

jonesonyou 04-10-2007 02:43 PM

O my god its A twink.....j/k

does twink sell?

Deej 04-10-2007 02:45 PM

not their ...

http://www.artezen.com/shop/images/img_l_tea_63177.jpg

... cup of tea?

Quick Buck 04-10-2007 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jonesonyou (Post 12232701)
O my god its A twink.....j/k

does twink sell?

I'm not talking regular twink man.. i'm talking along the lines of their other sites where the people in the pics look *really* underage and all the focus of the site is on how young and innocent little johnny is.

Scott McD 04-10-2007 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quick Buck (Post 12232674)
I'm sure there is a big demand out ther for 18 year old boys who look 13 blowing older men.

Now there's a thought... :Oh crap

Quick Buck 04-10-2007 02:49 PM

it turns my stomach too! i'm just trying to understand why they won't touch little boy looking models.. is it a concern about getting in trouble or is it just that they won't make a gay site?

_Richard_ 04-10-2007 03:35 PM

i thought porn was supposed to be fantasy though?

Quick Buck 04-10-2007 04:43 PM

if your fantasy is snuff should you be allowed to buy fake snuff films? what if your fantasy is hardcore violent rape? what it these girls on these sites all actually said "hee hee i'm 13!"... just because they say it doesnt make it real or any less "fantasy" as long as there is a little disclaimer in 8pt font at the bottom of the site.

I think there is a bit of a responsibility as paysite owners to provide content that is clearly without doing a bunch of "holy shit" double takes and fine print reading both a) consensual and b) of age. Would it be acceptable to build a paysite on not.not.not.childporn.com? After all your double negatives technically told everybody that the girls are legal. :-/

By promoting the concept of being UNDERage or the concept of being non-consensual you validate the fact that porn is made by scum bags and you add fuel to the already hot fire that "that dirty porno stuff should be illegal". If the concept of these sites is that the girls are *barely* legal well, they should promote that fact but they make every effort to hide the fact that these models are actually 18 from the surfer.

When guys like that associate with guys like me and advertise in places that are run by mens mags like Playbody they don't legitimize themselves, they just make everybody else and the entire industry look worse :)

donkevlar 04-10-2007 05:16 PM

I don't see the point of mixing gay/straight in one affiliate program?

For the closet case market?

Quick Buck 04-10-2007 07:56 PM

um.. every major program mixes gay/straight.

yes, closet cases are profitable. i hear closet case predators are even more profitable!

NaughtyRob 04-10-2007 09:48 PM

I would think about making those sites but couldnt stomach shooting the content.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:47 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123