GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Did they change King Kong into a bestiality flick? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=722350)

baddog 04-08-2007 06:00 PM

Did they change King Kong into a bestiality flick?
 
Seems with the remake that chick and the monkey are sure getting "close."


I guess I don't recall the original . . . were there dinosaurs in it too?

After Shock Media 04-08-2007 06:03 PM

They didn't change that, it has always been a bestiality flick. Though the dinosaurs are indeed new.

However I really felt that the director this time should of respected the kong and not have him have no frank and beans.

evildick 04-08-2007 06:05 PM

There were dinos in the original black and white version. They took them out in the 1976 remake.

The Peter Jackson version is a lot closer to the original film than the previous remake was. Jack Black seems so out of place though. I keep expecting him to burst out into a Dio song or something.

baddog 04-08-2007 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media (Post 12222912)
They didn't change that, it has always been a bestiality flick. Though the dinosaurs are indeed new.

However I really felt that the director this time should of respected the kong and not have him have no frank and beans.

Do we really know he is "king" kong and not "queen" kong?

After Shock Media 04-08-2007 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 12222919)
Do we really know he is "king" kong and not "queen" kong?

Well that would just be gross, cause that would make it a lesbo bestiality flick.

Opps and evildick is right there were dinos in the b/w version. Brain got confused with other bad remake.

notabook 04-08-2007 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by evildick (Post 12222916)
The Peter Jackson version is a lot closer to the original film than the previous remake was. Jack Black seems so out of place though. I keep expecting him to burst out into a Dio song or something.

Yep... Jack Black was what really pissed me off in that movie, he was totally unnecessary.

IllTestYourGirls 04-08-2007 06:25 PM

i thought the whole movie sucked

CaptainHowdy 04-08-2007 07:03 PM

I agree, the new "King Kong" need more dinosaurs...

digifan 04-08-2007 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaptainHowdy (Post 12223057)
I agree, the new "King Kong" need more dinosaurs...

Why do you say that???

CDSmith 04-08-2007 08:49 PM

King Kong original 1933 version -- there were dinosaurs. Quite a few of them. Kong fights a tyranosaurus rex and wins by ripping his jaws wide open.

1976 remake with Jeff Bridges -- Closest thing to a dinosaur in this one is a giant snake that Kong fights. There also may be a few flying pteradactyl-type dinosaurs flying around, I forget now. It's been some time since I saw this version.

For me the original has and always will carry the most movie impact, even though it's special effects are far far outdated it's well, the ORIGINAL... some spots of bad acting and all. The '76 version is worth watching, was modernized to include the world trade center which now holds some endearment to many. The newest version too is worth watching, has some Jurassic Park - like appeal, cutting edge effects that bring the original up to date.... but the '33 version will always be the favorite.

Randyyy 04-08-2007 09:24 PM

yea i saw it on hbo two nights ago......... she's hott


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123