NYC pushes circumcision to fight AIDS
 

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070405/...s_circumcision

The UN also made a big push for cutting dicks just the other day for fighting AIDS in Africa.

Does this mean cut guys can fuck more without rubbers?

I wonder if they're offering free anaesthetics along with the free circumcision. Newborns don't get that priviledge......

what a shitload of bullshit - can i have my own planet to get rid of all idiots out there please?? :2 cents:

This is the exact response everybody was giving last time this was brought up. All of the GFY doctors agreed that circumcision would do nothing to prevent AIDS.

Is it because everyone is against circumcision (it seems to be predominantly Europeans) or does GFY have a vast wealth of medical professionals?

I thought it was mandatory in the usa

Speaking of bullshit, if you've ever wondered what circumcision involved... watch this.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=8bpPZ2p0lh0

do you really think that a civilized western citizen with an uncircumsized dick is more likely to spread aids than an circumsized african that believes fucking a virgin will cure him from aids?

man, only the slightest believe in that is the biggest bullshit i ever heard. please someone explain me how those 2 things have anything to do with each other. please, please, please...

do you believe uncircumsized guys keep some needles under their foreskin that poke the womens vagina or what?

i really want to throw up when i read this nonsense - honestly

<---------- happy to be cut. :)

Hey it's a start! cleanliness is next to godliness!


glad im ahead of the game =))

I haven't said what I believe. I'm just posting news and asking why such strong opinions. I'm not a doctor, nor have I done the research. Hell I don't even know all that much about AIDS.

I'm certainly not qualified to say the argument is true. Are you qualified to say the argument is false?

The little I have read, has led me to believe that supposedly the foreskin can "hang on" to the virus, as ridiculous as it sounds. I have also read that its more difficult for men to get AIDS from women through sex then the reverse.

Cutting of the foreskin to prevent HIV is just as efficient as cutting of the eyelids to prevent going blind :2 cents:

Interesting.

http://archive.salon.com/health/sex/...ids/index.html

i suggest everyone starts reading about AIDS first. even those "specialists"

this is an excellent article about that: http://www.howstuffworks.com/aids.htm

and it's way more likely you get hepatitis btw - much more dangerous and also deadly :2 cents:

i didn't know womens pussy contains razor blades - at least not since vietnam war

those guys probably have no foreskin - so how would they know

have you heard of anal tissue tearing easier than vaginal tissue and making it easier to contract aids? same concept.

sure - i'm absolutely aware of that. not the same though :2 cents:

Just read the article. Says nothing to counter anything I've posted.

And you keep bringing up razor blades?

nope. remember the USA is a country that you can choose your destiny and what you like to do unless President Bush doesn't like you and then he send a couple of agents to your place for a talk and try to get your point of view only you have a horrible car crash on the way home before they can get to talk to you all by chance of course.

Yes only razorblades can cause a tear, a cut, or a abrasion didnt you know? lol

just to exaggerate the nonsense of "The tender foreskin is easily torn and scratched during intercourse" - it didn't happen to me in 35 years. and how tender can the foreskin be compared to the sensitive glans? plus: the foreskin is pulled back during fucking...

but everyone keep believing if you like :2 cents:

circumcision is pretty fucked up but studies do show that intact foreskins are more likely to get tiny abrasions rather than those who don't have foreskins.

you probably wouldn't even notice in most cases but you have to agree that it must happen to someone, somehow circumsized or not otherwise aids and other diseases transfered via blood wouldn't be an issue.

exactly - thats the point. it has something to do with safer sex, the way you choose your sex partners, the sex practics and unfortunately the place you live (like africa). and not whether you have a foreskin or not

I don't like this idea at all, most guys will just thing oh cool i don't need a condom! And there are still accidents every year from failed circumcisions, granted it isn't as bad as female ones.
And i'm speaking as someone who had one done for medical reasons myself.

so, if i cut my foreskin off, it's possible my chances of getting H.I.V. are reduced by 60&#37;, possibly?

But if i wear a CONDOM, my chances are reduced to, say, .0001% chance?

wow, break out the snippers Dr. Jew!

R

I take it MaDalton is uncut :1orglaugh

No one who'd been circumsized would be so defensive about it.

he also seems to have his medical degree, since he knows so much more about the subject than doctors who have done research on it.