Tony Blair offers Iran hardline decision: Make a move
 

Tony Blair has said that if Iran does not release the 15 British troops in a timely manner, he will continue to make press releases suggesting that Iran release the troops. He is committed to pursuing the release of her Majesty's soldiers until they are safe and free, even if that means making really harsh beat-around-the-bush comments for months.

A spokesperson for the Iranian government has replied "Oh. I didn't realise that the situation was so grave for us. We will be releasing the sailors immediately." he paused for a moment and then shouted "NOT!" into my face.

See also: Briton and the US have a history of being faggots and stepping on eggshells when it comes to Iran.

"I'll send you hate mail until you give me my boys back"

WOW!!!

Will he be sending any nasty letters?

LoL this is why I said in another thread the only good thing about Bush is the fact we would have already launched cruise missle at them.

I feel for the troops and hope they are released but sometimes you have to take the bull by it's horns. Iran is one of those countries that only understands payne.

I hate Bush and he's a total fuck up, but at least in a situation like this he'd probably act in force. This is the second time Iran has done the same thing to British troops and they will continue to do it because they know they can get away with it.

Iran needs to get a little bitch slap to knock some sense into them.

those sailors were bait and the Iranians took it.
now Bush and Blair have a reason to invade.
stay tuned folks. it will get better.

and what would Canada do?

You are a dumb fuck, go back to moveon.org

then why the big build up in the area?
:1orglaugh
http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/meast/....ap/index.html

http://playahata.com/images/otherpic...room_cloud.jpg

the future of the islamic revolution in iran.

Here we go again

Tony is a stool boy. He knows it and is just playing his part.

Bahhh baaaaaaaahhhh!!!!

Duhh because we may have to strike Irans nuclear projects and the only thing that these barbarians understand is a show of force. Also buddy we dont need a fucking excuse to go to war, havent you people learned that by now?

Either way,, things are getting fucked up.

Canada doesn't have 15 sailors to lose.

http://www.pages.drexel.edu/~afd26/i...adian_navy.jpg

What's worse is that in the UK he now percieved as a "lame duck" leader and I would say he would struggle to get the backing from even his party's members to use force against Iran..............and I recon the Iranians know that only too well :Oh crap

Sarah,
The exact same thing - because they are a bunch of lameass fags too.
The response would be:

"CNN: Stephen Harper today announced that he is thinking about going to the UN to talk about how to bring home the entire Canadian Navy from Iran. All 8 Naval officers comprising the entire Canadian Fleet were taken 2 years ago by the Iranians. They have been tortured and maimed. Today Stephen Harper is considering talking through the UN to see if they can bring them back to safety. This is after years of nasty letters and idle threats which is a staple strategy against insane leaders of fucked up countries all around the world by UK and Canadian diplomats."

:party-smi

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh
Classic pic

you know what i reckon the vast mojority of you lot chatting shit bout blair, arent even british so have no idea what you are chatting about, the simle fact is that if blair goes to war with iran over this the first thing they will do is kill the troops hld hostage. but if worse comes to worse blair will invade trust me on that.
the difference between the uk anbd american gov is that we see war as the last option whereas alot of time you tend to see it as the only option

This does feel a bit like when the Iranian embassy when the conclusion came as power was handed from Carter to Reagan.

Blair probably has less than two months before he steps down. I bet Gordon Brown is hoping Tony fixes it for him first.

I dont understand why the media is making a big whoop about this - the exact same thing happened 2 years ago with some other British soldiers and sailors taken by Iran - and you didnt hear a peep in the news - and they were returned after the British finally admitted they fucked up and the guys were in Iranian waters - same case here - its just gonna take longer for Blair to admit fault this time

Make a move, make a move, every posse make a move :)

Why do you assume the British are at fault here? Your friends must fucking hate you, I mean if you cant trust friends who can you trust? Oh and the media DID pay attention to it two years ago, the British NEVER admitted fucking up either. You are a fucking terrorist arent you.

Well it took us 444 days to get out hostages back. We would have gotten back sooner but Reagan made a deal with the Iranians not to release them so he could win the election in 1980 then have then release after he was inaugurated so it would look good for him.

Wow - you must be an US All-American - gee - did they teach you to spout BS like that when you were teaching at the Chemical school in the military - you should have come into an outfit that really went out and fought and maybe you would have a little different attitude instead of that sniveling little kid that hides at a blackboard in the Army - I love cowards that do nothing but sit at their keyboards and hate on everyone - so Splum my friend - while I tend to have very little respect for you and your "type" of flag-waving little imbeciles that have never touched a weapon in war - I also have a lot of compassion for you as its obvious that you just needed a little extra attention when you were younger and didnt get it - terrible shame

Oh and here's the news from 2004 when it happened - almost exactly the same place this recent event occured:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3835313.stm
"British officials have said that the men may have mistakenly strayed over the maritime border."

You know nothing about me and I am almost certain you were never in the military so dont make me laugh.

The word "MAY" is not a definite but the fact that you assume the British are at fault speaks volumes about your allegiance terrorist.

http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2007130852,00.html


Now someone tell me why mock executions arent against the Geneva convention?

Lets see - you were in the 3rd Chemical if I remember correctly - which makes you a teacher at a Missouri school? Ft Woods school maybe?

As far as my military service - I served at the end of Viet Nam and for 12 years after that - I wont go into a lot of detail - suffice it say that I guarantee you that the medals I have are for actions you wouldnt have the allegiance to the US military or the stomach/guts for - and yes it was the US military I served in.
E6 up for Warrant when I left

I assume the British are at fault because the geographical location is exactly the same as the event in 2004 when the British admitted they had strayed - it happens all the time and the Iranians used it for a little PR - so fucking what? Like I said before - its all in the media attention its getting and we know who runs the media these days :thumbsup

Because the Geneva Convention only applies to protection of prisoners of parties at war - and Iran isnt in a war

You should address me properly.

That explains it.


Its ok that they verbally abuse and conduct mock executions on these British soldiers for a little PR? Are you fucking insane? I bet you were the first hippie to cry about the terrorists in Gitmo and Abu Ghraib yet when British soldiers are going through the same thing you say its PR. If you are an American you are a fucking disease to your own people, with Americans like you who needs enemies. Fucking traitor piece of shit.

Dont you mean countries at war? :winkwink:
Even with your "skewed" words above the rules wouldnt apply to prisoners at Gitmo. Either way you lose terrorist.

No I mean parties - since that is exactly what the Geneva convention says - but since youve never been in combat you wouldnt have to know the contents of the conventions:
"
Article 4 defines prisoners of war to include:
4.1.1 Members of the armed forces of a Party to the conflict and members of militias of such armed forces"

And did I ever bring up Gitmo or any other acts by anyone else - no - you did - which means that they must weigh heavy on your little brain - isnt it a fact that the loudest opposition to something is usually the most sympethetic - which I guess puts you in the situation of being the terrorists' friend and explains your insane rantings around here :thumbsup

You know what Marc Im just gonna bury the hatchet with ya here, lets go for a round of golf at Clear Creek. What do you say?

Wow your kind is certainly outnumbered down there in ole Miss, no wonder you are such a keyboard warrior. :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

I did - I called you a desk jockey and idiot :thumbsup

Wow - you can use whois - youre good at that keyboard stuff
Come on down - its a short walk over the the first tee :thumbsup

Thats sir desk jockey to you grunt.

I guess that means you were what - an O3 - I used to take little maggots like you and chew you up for breakfast - then go drink lunch with the O5s laughing at youre asses

Someone should tell Canada that Afghanistan is land locked..

I thought that was part of the joke lol :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

PLEASE, don't bring up the GENEVA convention ...