FHG builder
 

Do you use the FHG builder in nats and what are your toughts about it.
Do you prefer it or you stick with the standart pre-build FHGs?

hm, anyone?

bump :)
..

nobody using it? :)

wish i was so i could respond. sounds cool cause a lot of FHG (that ive seen) suck for conversion anyway

From and aff. point of view, I prefer standard pre-built hosted galleries. I've found the few "build your own" systems that I've tried, whether they were NATS' or something else, somewhat annoying.

annoying in a what way?

i cant believe that almost nobody has something to say?

Oh... I wish I had a fhg builder/nats

I definitely prefer a gallery generator with multiple types of selections with easy cvs dumps...

Bomber

thanks :)

i've only played with a few programs who are using the nats gallery builder and it seemed limited option wise. it's great if you want to build one specific gallery but for those who want multiple templates instead of a single template design on 30 galleries it just doesn't seem to work or i just couldn't figure out how to select 10 templates and have them applied to XX amount of galleries...

i'll stick with the standard pre-built FHGs for now

We just use standard pre-build FHGs.

It is a lot easier for TGP owners that want to grab our galleries to copy paste a dump of galleries in one go than to spend hours preparing a few dozen galleries.

Yes, we use the Nats gallery builder. Had to add some things to the builder to increase the functionality of it. The builder gives affiliates who use the FHGs more configuration options and increases the totally quantity of unique galleries. But there are affiliates that are not familiar with how to use it and do not want to ask. So the results with or without the builder may be similar.

There are tips to make the gallery builders more functional to affiliates. In most cases you can switch out the template number in the link code to quickly change the templates in a gallery dump.

If you have specific questions let me know.

Annoying in that they actually have to do some work :winkwink:

I prefer prebuilt FHGs, the builder is just a waste of time imho.

I use it on an admin side ... this is no slam to NATS, but this wasn't the easiest thing to grasp. HOWEVER ... once I got it, it's really easy to use.

The only downside for webmasters is that they can't dump links. But it does offer many different combinations for templates and galleries.

If I had to do it all over again, I'd still utilize Gallery Builder.

I will repeat myself from many threads in the past...
"You can't automate creativity."

absolutely true! :)
But its good to provide some automated tools to webmasters who are in lack of creativity anyway :)