GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   New Law Forces Married Couples to Have Kids in 3 Years, or be Annulled (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=704136)

fuzzylogic 02-07-2007 06:58 PM

New Law Forces Married Couples to Have Kids in 3 Years, or be Annulled
 
this facinating new direction was not created to become legal, but rather force same-sex marriage ban into high courts!

Gadow doesn't actually want the initative to pass; he wants to force a challenge of it, which would take the Defense of Marrriage Act into higher courts. It would actually force conservatives to have one of their own ideas challenged in higher courts, and they will do it on their own initiative.

please read source :)

source: http://www.heraldnet.com

12clicks 02-07-2007 07:03 PM

just another idiot noticed only because of the internet.

""""Supporters of I-957 must gather at least 224,800 valid signatures by July 6 to put it on the November ballot.""""

Snake Doctor 02-07-2007 07:06 PM

It must be true, I read it on the internet

DaddyHalbucks 02-07-2007 07:13 PM

I don't know why religious nuts and right wingers have their boxers in a knot over gay marriage. Gay sex freaks them out, but if anything, gay marriage might actually *reduce* promiscuity in the gay community.

It makes no sense. Bigotry is the only explanation.

fuzzylogic 02-07-2007 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 11879323)
just another idiot noticed only because of the internet.

""""Supporters of I-957 must gather at least 224,800 valid signatures by July 6 to put it on the November ballot.""""

only one idiot failed to realize it's not intended to pass

12clicks 02-07-2007 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks (Post 11879375)
I don't know why religious nuts and right wingers have their boxers in a knot over gay marriage. Gay sex freaks them out, but if anything, gay marriage might actually *reduce* promiscuity in the gay community.

It makes no sense. Bigotry is the only explanation.

or the fact that people resist change based on the latest fad.

if we're going to call marriage a union of 2 men, why not start calling the color red "green"?

12clicks 02-07-2007 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fuzzylogic (Post 11879401)
only one idiot failed to realize it's not intended to pass

only one idiot thinks it will get enough signatures to even be taken seriously.

or maybe said idiot didn't understand the big words.

interracialtoons 02-07-2007 09:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 11879413)
why not start calling the color red "green"?

You do if you work in television. Red clothes show up as green on the TV screen. True!

Rochard 02-07-2007 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lenny2 (Post 11879343)
It must be true, I read it on the internet

Because we all know everything on the Internet is real, right?

RIGHT?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123