.XXX YES or NO?
 

I say NO

NO! I dont want it

YES. You sick people do not wish to protect innocent children from porn? Shame on all of you.

Ivanoff, are you totally mad, dude? What innocent children are talking about?
Looks like some pathetic BS

No - .XXX will not protect kids, will show exactly where to find porn :playboy

yeah but it will be 10x easier for parents to block porn..

It is very American thing to simplify everything.

.xxx tells these dullards that here is porn.

Next will be .gay, .anal, and .tits, Just so these sad, mindless people can be quite clear when visiting a site such as www,gayanaltitfuckingbitchesporn.tld

No...............................

no to .xxx

yes to .kids

NO. Yes to educating parents and filtering.

Exactly, .kids would allow parents to let their children view content that is for kids only.

.xxx would NOT help to keep kids away from porn, filtering or not, there are much worse things around than just porn, e.g. violence, death, racism, and so on.

Positive filtering works much better than blacklists, partner submissions accounts for TGPs are a good example from our industry: Almost everybody uses them, because blacklisting is useless.

We don't need it

Under any and all circumstances... NO

ICANN's Board previously found the proposed .XXX agreement to be so deficient
in merit that is was rejected by a nearly 2-1 vote. In our view the proposed
"cure" of the RPA under consideration is substantially worse than the original
proposal and deserves unanimous rejection. It would implicate ICANN in areas
far outside its technical mandate and would set s series of terrible precedents
that would disfigure the fundamental purpose of the DNS.



For all of the reasons stated in this letter, the ICA strongly opposes adoption
of the Revised Proposed Agreement for .XXX and urges the Board to promptly
reject it and to do so with finality.



The ICA appreciates your consideration of our comments in this matter.

Sincerely,

Philip S. Corwin
Partner, Butera & Andrews; Washington, DC
Counsel, Internet Commerce Association

my feelings exactly

of course I don't want kids getting hold of porn...but I don't think .xxx will be the best way to do that!

NO to .xxx

.XXX?

I say FUCK NO.

hell NO!

Nope. I won't be buying any .xxx domains.

What day is ICANN going to make the decision (again) ?

NO at 99.9%

somewhere in the next few weeks most likely

No.

Segregation has proven, time and time again, to be the wrong way to go about things.

No.

Segregation has proven, time and time again, to be the wrong way to go about things.

Thanks... I could have sworn I saw a date somewhere but that could have been from last year.

I say ISP's should be forced to do Cable Television has done.. Provide the filters for the parents since the parents can't filter the kids.

A simple login screen to the Internet (or inactive time) would do the trick. Each parent/kid has a unique login, the parent can set the controls at the ISP level of how strong they want the filters - just like cable companies provide for us now.

Not NO, but hell no.

no 8char