![]() |
Trading links with penalized sites??
Ok, this has been bugging me for a few days, so lets see what everyone thinks. I think linking to a lot of penalized sites is bad for my page (Google wise). Do you agree?
Now, the hard thing is deciding who I think is penalized by Google. Here are the 2 scenarios that are currently bugging me. Please keep in mind that I do not care about PR for PR sake when trading. I only mention PR in the following examples as ways to possibly determine a penalty. If a site/page has been online for over a year, shouldn't it have some PR? I am coming across 2 things in checking over my link trades that bother me. 1) Site/page online for over a year (some online for 3 or 4 years)...no PR, but site is cached. Do you think this is indicative of a penalty? Would you trade with a site like this? Would you delete a trade with a site like this? 2) Site/page online for over a year....no PR, and NO CACHE of the page. Do you think this is indicative of a penalty? Would you trade with a site like this? Would you delete a trade with a site like this? Thoughts please.... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
bump
5678 |
:(
Guess I should have included Juicy, drama, herpes, and shaving in my thread title. |
I wouldn't even bother trading with PR0 sites, unless the site is of really high quality and relevant to your niche...
|
Quote:
me it would look like they arent even trying. If their not trying then what benifit do you get for linking to them? And if you already have pr why not trade with other sites with pr and and up to parr? |
I traded links with these sites a long time ago. Guess I am looking for a couple of things here.
Do other people think that those things are indicative of a penalty? Do people think I would be justified in pulling link trades to those types of sites? |
Domains can exist for a long time with no real PR. Without incoming links, etc, pages are just dead ends. Google doesn't give PR to dead ends.
|
Its not the PR that brings you money. Surfers do.
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
A site can be online for over a year and not cached if there's no inbound links so penalty or not linking to it isn't going to help ya.
|
Most reciprocal links these days are either a penalty or of no SE value.
Traffic is a different story obviously. |
Quote:
Anyway, if you care about penalty, then you care about PR too. Its connected :) |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
But, to answer you question about trade/no-trade; As I said, its the surfers that brings you money, not Google. A PR0 site can still send traffic that would exceed your "penalty" from Google. Higher PR only means you get crawled more often, but in the end its who (not how many) visiting your site and what you put on it that matters in your bank account. And btw, if its not even listed on Google, well it must have some traffic from somewhere, otherwise trading is pointless. :) |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:07 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123