GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   First Pic Of O'Hare UFO (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=698961)

DOCTOR 30 01-24-2007 10:25 AM
First Pic Of O'Hare UFO
 
This story just broke

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/...g27#pid2898150

Now check out the above pic in comparison to an eyewitness sketch here:

http://www.ufoevidence.org/cases/case958.htm

jacked 01-24-2007 10:29 AM
def photochop

15 seconds using the blur tool and i could re-create the same effect LOL

DOCTOR 30 01-24-2007 10:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacked (Post 11782830)
def photochop

15 seconds using the blur tool and i could re-create the same effect LOL
Please do. We could submit it as a counterpoint. How a professional at photoshop can reproduce the same effect. Then we could do a 1 on 1 comparison with the experts.

Big_Red 01-24-2007 10:51 AM
grrrrrr the picture isnt clear enough. why the fuck cant anyone get a good picture dammit!

/rant off


anyways, that didnt prove shit to me. looks like a cloud farted or something.

hunglo6 01-24-2007 11:01 AM
Weather Balloon?

HL

Juilan 01-24-2007 11:08 AM
I've been an expert witness regarding photo authenticity in court in my past. I am also a UFO believer in some instances where there has been no satisfiable evidence to the contrary. If I were to testify regarding this photo I would point to 3 factors that discredit it in my mind.

1) Exif data is missing
2) Blurred pixels immediately to the left are not consistent with level of pixel artifacts visible in the rest of the photo.
3) Resembles water drop on lens.

The eyewitness reports in this case have been persuasive, but I would not stand behind this particular photo as evidence.

DOCTOR 30 01-24-2007 11:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big_Red (Post 11782974)
grrrrrr the picture isnt clear enough. why the fuck cant anyone get a good picture dammit!

/rant off


anyways, that didnt prove shit to me. looks like a cloud farted or something.
Don't worry more pics to come

starpimps 01-24-2007 11:13 AM
visitors!!!

Mr. Romance 01-24-2007 11:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Juilan (Post 11783086)
I've been an expert witness regarding photo authenticity in court in my past. I am also a UFO believer in some instances where there has been no satisfiable evidence to the contrary. If I were to testify regarding this photo I would point to 3 factors that discredit it in my mind.

1) Exif data is missing
2) Blurred pixels immediately to the left are not consistent with level of pixel artifacts visible in the rest of the photo.
3) Resembles water drop on lens.

The eyewitness reports in this case have been persuasive, but I would not stand behind this particular photo as evidence.
Nice work!

Mr. Romance

DOCTOR 30 01-24-2007 11:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Juilan (Post 11783086)
I've been an expert witness regarding photo authenticity in court in my past. I am also a UFO believer in some instances where there has been no satisfiable evidence to the contrary. If I were to testify regarding this photo I would point to 3 factors that discredit it in my mind.

1) Exif data is missing
2) Blurred pixels immediately to the left are not consistent with level of pixel artifacts visible in the rest of the photo.
3) Resembles water drop on lens.

The eyewitness reports in this case have been persuasive, but I would not stand behind this particular photo as evidence.
Juilian I agree, the main pic is watermarked however. If you have time check the rest of that thread and see what the other 'experts' have to say. In the meantime, several experts are on it to determine what the artifact is. Whether just water on the lens or an actual object or just some prank.

We figure with the hundreds if not thousands of people in the vicinity at the time, someone has taken pics. Something will turn up.

Onixia 01-24-2007 11:18 AM
Green man invaders!

LustyBucks 01-24-2007 11:21 AM
Load of crap. Could be convincing story for children. The truth is out there anyway :)

4Man 01-24-2007 11:26 AM
Cool . lol

Phoenix 01-24-2007 11:33 AM
yeah i posted about this when it first happened....i dont know about that photo...i was hoping there would be more then one..i mean most people have a camera at the airport :(

_Richard_ 01-24-2007 11:39 AM
funny i didn't hear anything about it..

R

NinjaSteve 01-24-2007 11:40 AM
Looks like a HUGE contact lens to me.

chartgraves 01-24-2007 11:43 AM
cut n pasting....

Quote:
I registered here because of this thread and have been following it with great interest (have never been to this site before being linked to this story through Rense.com).

With that said, here is my deduction of the photograph and of my knowledge:

1. It was posted anonymously by a user whose registration date for this site is January 23 (today). Most likely it is someone who works at the airport, or someone who knows someone that works at the airport or it is the original poster rampagext's new alias since 1. he told us he wants to stay "under the radar for a bit" so to speak and 2. he is the one that initially told us that he has heard of a photo and he will attempt to obtain it. However for the time being let's play down this situation because we do not need to expose rampage becaues he is doing a valiant and valuable thing here.

2. The photograph seems to be very consistent to me, with the information that I have about the actual sighting.

A. The UFO in the photograph matches perfectly the physical descriptions that we have, of being oval and fuzzy looking (the quote about it being 'hard to focus on')

B. The photograph seems to match exactly the height of said UFO. It was supposedly around 1000 to 1500 ft if I can remember and from my judgement in the photograph that is the altitude I would describe it at.

C. The SKY/WEATHER condition matches identically in the photograph to the original reports of the sky being very overcast with low clouds etc.

3. As for the elevation of the photograph here is my assumption: the most initial reports that came out said that it was a PILOT who had opened up the plane windows and taken a picture with a cell phone cam, I remember this particular detail specifically. Thus the height from which the photograph was taken can be explained it seems to me by the fact that it is being taken out of a plane window by a pilot.

4. The "rain drop" theory to me seems inconsistent with the shape of the UFO. In my opinion, a raindrop which is flying downwards from the sky, upon hitting the lens would form an oval that is extended VERTICALLY in its length not horizontally as the force of impact against the lens would force it to extend DOWNARD. How would a raindrop form a horizontally extended oval? To me that seems implausible. Furthermore, if there is a light rain or drizzle what are the chances that only ONE perfect raindrop would have hit the lens rather than multiple ones?

5. Now for some skepticism to play devil's advocate: Why is the UFO not centered in the photograph and is so completely out of the center of the shot as to be in the remote upper right hand corner?

6. Secondly, if someone did have access to a camera and has seen such an incredible sight as a UFO hovering over O'Hare, why would they take only one such poor photograph? Why is there not multiple if not MANY photographs from this same source and why are there no shots of the parted clouds beneath blue sky after the UFO had shot up through the clouds? Surely, if there is a worker with a camera watching and taking a photo of this incredible occurrence, surely he would take multiple photos and wait until the UFO is gone for certain before being content to pack away his camera. Who would be content to look up at a once in a lifetime sighting of a UFO, shoot one mediocre/poor quality shot and then stuff their camera into their back pocket? Of course one possible explanation is that this photo is the tip of the iceberg OR at the least there are several others in existence (perhaps anonymous user would like to upload the rest for us?). However, if this was the case, why are these photos being released literally MONTHS after the initial incident?? Certainly something is off here. Perhaps the whistleblower is sort of 'testing the waters' a bit first.

StickyGreen 01-27-2007 01:23 AM
and here we have another new photo of the ufo at o'hare...

http://images.abovetopsecret.com/PIC006.JPG

HappyMan 01-27-2007 01:26 AM
I believe it cause I wanna believe it. Been watching a lot of X-Files I guess. The eyewitness sketch comparison is good though.

96ukssob 01-27-2007 01:27 AM
i call BS... its just people trying to sneak over from canada in a ballon

martinsc 01-27-2007 01:34 AM
http://www.websmileys.com/sm/aliens/spacecraft.gif

EscortBiz 01-27-2007 01:46 AM
i think the us govt should make an annoncement yes we have ufo and people from other planets checking us out, nothing we can do about it goodbye

Scott McD 01-27-2007 02:23 AM
People still believe in this shit ??

StickyGreen 01-27-2007 04:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott McD (Post 11799798)
People still believe in this shit ??
And what do you believe in? That tons of different pilots, employees, and bystanders all got together to develop a plot to fool everyone with a story about a metallic object in the sky that wasn't really there? Yea, that makes perfect sense...

I think I'll goto Sacramento airport tomorrow and rally a bunch of random workers and pilots to join my cult and help me make up fake stories about UFOs that we all saw at the same time. Happens all the time right...might as well... :1orglaugh

EscortBiz 01-27-2007 04:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by StickyGreen (Post 11800122)
And what do you believe in? That tons of different pilots, employees, and bystanders all got together to develop a plot to fool everyone with a story about a metallic object in the sky that wasn't really there? Yea, that makes perfect sense...

I think I'll goto Sacramento airport tomorrow and rally a bunch of random workers and pilots to join my cult and help me make up fake stories about UFOs that we all saw at the same time. Happens all the time right...might as well... :1orglaugh
lets say it is true who cares what can we do it is what it is ya know

bobby666 01-27-2007 04:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Juilan (Post 11783086)
I've been an expert witness regarding photo authenticity in court in my past. I am also a UFO believer in some instances where there has been no satisfiable evidence to the contrary.
cool knowledge, i am impressed :thumbsup

StickyGreen 01-27-2007 04:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EscortBiz (Post 11800134)
lets say it is true who cares what can we do it is what it is ya know
Who cares? Don't you care that the United States government has been delaying disclosure for so long? Most other countries actually acknowledge the extraterrestrial presence and are trying to get the U.S. to hurry up and spill the beans with them... Mexico has thousands of videos like these: https://youtube.com/watch?v=nGoKOTsjl7s I think we are getting close, especially due to new technologies with camera/video phones etc.

StickyGreen 02-06-2007 03:10 PM
Here's some brand new pics of the chicago UFO...

http://images.abovetopsecret.com/ufos/ufo001.jpg

http://images.abovetopsecret.com/ufos/ufo002.jpg

http://images.abovetopsecret.com/ufos/ufo003.jpg

gornyhuy 02-06-2007 03:25 PM
Sofa King weak.

SleazyDream 02-06-2007 03:29 PM
they were after Juicy - he was just there.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123